ارزیابی عملکرد سیستم آبیاری داربستی و تعیین بهره‌وری مصرف آب یونجه در الگوهای مختلف قرارگیری آبپاش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی آبیاری و آبادانی،دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

چکیده

کارایی سامانه آبیاری داربستی به‌عنوان سامانه آبیاری بارانی جدید، با سه الگوی قرارگیری آبپاش شامل 8*8 متر (SS-88 )، 10*8 متر (SS-810) و 12*8 متر (SS-812)، در کشت یونجه در استان مرکزی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. شاخص‌های یکنواختی توزیع (DU)، ضریب یکنواختی (CU)، راندمان کاربرد آب در ربع پایین (AELQ) و بهره‌وری مصرف آب (WP) در سال‌های 1398 و 1399 و پس از برداشت‌های سوم (HA-3)، چهارم (HA-4) و پنجم (HA-5) محصول تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد که میانگین ضریب یکنواختی در الگوی SS-88 در سال اول و دوم به ترتیب 76/84 و 34/86 درصد بوده و بیشترین میزان ضریب یکنواختی را نسبت به دو الگوی دیگر داشته است. یکنواختی توزیع آب در الگوی SS-88، SS-810 و SS-812 در سال اول و دوم به ترتیب برابر با 3/77، 31/79 و 38/75، 66/77 و 11/70 و 88/70 درصد بود که به ترتیب بیانگر عملکرد بسیار خوب، بسیار خوب و نسبتاً خوب در هر یک از این الگوها بود. همچنین شاخص AELQ در سال اول و دوم در هر سه الگو در سطح یک درصد تفاوت معنادار داشته است. بررسی آماری نیز بیانگر اختلاف معنادار در سطح یک درصد بین الگوی SS-812 با دو الگوی دیگر بود. بهره‌وری مصرف آب یونجه در الگوی SS-88، SS-810 و SS-812 در سال اول و دوم به ترتیب 84/1، 87/1 و 28/2، 43/2 و 3/2، 4/2 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب بود. بطورکلی الگوی SS-810 با توجه به شاخص‌های مورد بررسی الگوی مناسب‌تری می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and Determination of Water Productivity of Alfalfa in the Darbasti Irrigation System with Different Sprinkler Placement Patterns

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Mahdi Doust Mohammadi 1
  • Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi 1
  • Abdolmajid Liaghat 2
  • Reza Norooz Valashedi 1
1 Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.
2 Irrigation and Water Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Tehran University, Iran
چکیده [English]

The Water Productivity (WP) of the Darbasti Irrigation System (DIS) was evaluated in Alfalfa cultivation in the Markazi Province. The evaluation included three patterns of sprinkler placement: 8x8 meter (SS-88), 8x10 meter (SS-810), and 8x12 meter (SS-812). The Distribution Uniformity (DU), Coefficient of Uniformity (CU), Application Efficiency of Low Quarter (AELQ), and WP were determined in the years 2018 and 2019, after the third (HA-3), fourth (HA-4), and fifth (HA-5) yield harvests. The results showed that the average CU in the SS-88 pattern was 84.76% in the first year and 86.34% in the second year. This pattern had the highest CU compared to the other two patterns. The DU in SS-88, SS-810, and SS-812 patterns in the first and second year was 77.3%, 79.31%, and 75.38%, 77.66%, and 70.11%, 70.88%, respectively. These results indicate very good, good, and relatively good performance in each of the patterns, respectively. Moreover, there was a significant difference at the one percent level in the AELQ between the first and second year for all three patterns. The results showed a significant difference at the level of one percent between the SS-812 model and the other two models. The WP of alfalfa was 1.84 kg/m3, 1.87 kg/m3, and 2.28 kg/m3 for SS-88, SS-810, and SS-812 patterns, respectively, in the first year. In the second year, this index was 2.43 kg/m3, 2.3 kg/m3, and 2.4 kg/m3 for the same patterns, respectively. Generally, the SS-810 pattern of sprinkler placement is a suitable choice based on performance indicators.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • DU
  • CU
  • AELQ
  • WP

Evaluation and Determination of Water Productivity of Alfalfa in the Darbasti Irrigation System with Different Sprinkler Placement Patterns

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The escalating global population has created an unprecedented demand for food and agricultural products. Alfalfa stands as one of these crucial agricultural products, with its demand intensifying alongside population growth. Countries like Iran, with dry and semi-arid climate, are facing severe water shortages. Therefore, Water Productivity (WP) should be improved as much as possible. Over recent decades, various irrigation systems have evolved to optimize water distribution in fields while minimizing losses. Among these methods, various sprinkler irrigation systems have been employed for densely planted crops like Alfalfa.

Purpose:

Selecting the suitable irrigation method is one way to improve WP. Hence, the WP of the Darbasti Irrigation System (DIS), a new sprinkler irrigation system, was evaluated and compared in Alfalfa cultivation in the Markazi Province.

Research method:

This system was implemented in an area of 0.7 ha and consists of a set of columns, lateral irrigation pipes made of low-density polyethylene, cable, MP Rotator Hunter sprinkler and a number of related connections, which is activated and irrigates using hydraulic water pressure. The height of the columns from the ground level was 5 m and their distance from each other in the width of the land was considered 50 meters. The evaluation included three patterns of sprinkler placement: 8x8 meter (SS-88), 8x10 meter (SS-810), and 8x12 meter (SS-812). In this study, the Distribution Uniformity (DU), Coefficient of Uniformity (CU), Application Efficiency of Low Quarter (AELQ), and WP were determined in the years 2018 and 2019, after the third (HA-3), fourth (HA-4), and fifth (HA-5) yield harvests.

Results:

The results showed that the average CU in the SS-88 pattern was 84.76% in the first year and 86.34% in the second year. This pattern had the highest CU compared to the other two patterns. The water DU in SS-88, SS-810, and SS-812 patterns in the first and second year was 77.3%, 79.31%, and 75.38%, 77.66%, and 70.11%, 70.88%, respectively. These results indicate very good, good, and relatively good performance in each of the patterns, respectively. Moreover, the results showed that there was a significant difference at the one percent level in the AELQ between the first and second year for all three patterns. According to the results, the WP of alfalfa was 1.84 kg/m3, 1.87 kg/m3, and 2.28 kg/m3 for SS-88, SS-810, and SS-812 patterns, respectively, in the first year. In the second year, this index was 2.43 kg/m3, 2.3 kg/m3, and 2.4 kg/m3 for the same patterns, respectively. Investigations showed that the SS-810 pattern of sprinkler placement is a suitable choice based on performance indicators such as WP.

Conclusion:

To conclude, it can be stated that the indicators cannot solely demonstrate the absolute superiority of the patterns. It is suggested that future studies compare these patterns with each other in terms of energy consumption, implementation and operating costs, suitability for fields with irregular shapes and slopes, and more. Additionally, it is recommended to evaluate the DIS under various climatic conditions, soil textures, structures, and with different sprinkler placement patterns.

مراجع

Abbasi, F., Sohrab, F., and Abbasi, N. (2015). Evaluation of Irrigation Efficiencies in Iran. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 17(67), 113–128. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22092/aridse.2017.109617 1 (In Persian).
Abedinpour, M. (2017). Field evaluation of centre pivot sprinkler irrigation system in the North-East of Iran. Journal of Water and Land Development, 34(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwld-2017-0033.
Al-ghobari, H., & Dewidar, A. Z. (2021). A Comparative Study of Standard Center Pivot and Growers-Based Modified Center Pivot for Evaluating Uniformity Coefficient and Water Distribution.
Ascough, G. W., & Kiker, G. a. (2002). The effect of irrigation uniformity on irrigation water requirements. Water South African, 28(2), 235–242.
Ashraf, N., Mirzaei, F., and Mohammad-beigi, A. (2014). Hydraulic evaluation of Center pivot and classic fixed sprinkler irrigation system with movable sprinkler (case study: University of Tehran educational and research farm). Iranian Journal of Soil and WaterResearch, 46(2), 353–361 (In Persian).
Carracelas, G., Hornbuckle, J., Rosas, J., & Roel, A. (2019). Irrigation management strategies to increase water productivity in Oryza sativa ( rice ) in Uruguay. Agricultural Water Management, 222(June), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.049.
Cavero, J., Faci, J. M., & Martínez-Cob, A. (2016). Relevance of sprinkler irrigation time of the day on alfalfa forage production. Agricultural Water Management, 178, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.10.008.
Christiansen, J. E. (1942). Agricultural Experiment Station Irrigation By Sprinkling.
Dost Mohammadi, M., and Rahimi, H. (2019). Irrigation system rain simulator scaffold irrigation system (103289) (In Persian).
Ebrahimian, H., & Gholami, Z. (2019). Water Productivity of Maize and Alfalfa in Sprinkler Irrigation Systems. International Conference on Food, Nutrition and Agriculture, 1–5.
Farg, E., Arafat, S., El-wahed, M. S. A., & El-gindy, A. (2017). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences Evaluation of water distribution under pivot irrigation systems using remote sensing imagery in eastern Nile delta. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 20, S13–S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.12.001.
Faryabi, A., Marufpour, A., and Qamarnia, H. (2010). Investigation and evaluation of the fixed classical sprinkler irrigation system of Dehgolan plain of Kurdistan. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Techniques and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Sciences, 14(54), 1-17 (In Persian).
Gadami Firoozabadi, A., and Seidan, S. M. (2018). Evaluation of irrigation water productivity and economic analysis of alfalfa production in sprinkler and surface irrigation systems. Irrigation and Water Engineering of Iran, 10(37), 136-145 (In Persian).
Gholami, Z., Ebrahimian, H., and Nouri, H. (2015). Investigation of Irrigation Water Productivity in Sprinkler and Surface Irrigation Systems (Case study: Qazvin Plain). Irrigation Science and Engineering, 39(3), 135–146 (In Persian).
Grimes, D. W., Wiley, P. L., & Sheesley, W. R. (1992). Alfalfa Yield and Plant Water Relations with Variable Irrigation. Crop Science, 32(6), 1381–1387. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183x003200060015x.
Haghverdi, A., Leib, B. G., Washington-Allen, R. A., Buschermohle, M. J., & Ayers, P. D. (2016). Studying uniform and variable rate center pivot irrigation strategies with the aid of site-specific water production functions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 123, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2016.03.010.
Hashim, S., Khan, A. A., Ikram, R. M., Mehvish, F., Saifullah, M., Ali, M., Rehman, H.-, Hussain, A., Ashraf, A., Waqas, M., Hedfi, A., & Almalki, M. (2021). Performance evaluation of indigenous floppy sprinkler irrigation system for various crops water management. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 33(8), 101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101636.
Isla, R., & Aragüés, R. (2009). Response of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to diurnal and nocturnal saline sprinkler irrigations. I: Total dry matter and hay quality. Irrigation Science, 27(6), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0167-y.
Ismail, S. M., & Almarshadi, M. H. (2013). Maximizing productivity and water use efficiency of alfalfa under precise subsurface drip irrigation in arid regions †. 66(January), 57–66.
Jobbágy, J., Dančanin, P., Krištof, K., Maga, J., & Slaný, V. (2021). Evaluation of the Quality of Irrigation Machinery by Monitoring Changes in the Coefficients of Uniformity and Non-Uniformity of Irrigation. Agronomy, 11(8), 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081499.
Jobbágy, J., & Krištof, K. (2018). Evaluation of the coefficient of uniformity and nonuniformity of irrigation for wide-range irrigators in various field conditions. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 64(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.17221/8/2017-RAE.
Jobbágy, J., Michlian, N., Dačanin, P., & Rigó, I. (2019). Application and Evaluation of Performance Quality of Hose-Reel Irrigation Machine. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 22(4), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2019-0020.
Kazemi, S., & Izadpanah, Z. (2019). Technical Evaluation of Classic Stationary Sprinkler Irrigation Systems with Travelling Sprinklers in Eghlid , Fars Province. 42(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.22055/jise.2017.21215.1525.
Lamm, F. R., Harmoney, K. R., Aboukheira, A. A., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). ALFALFA PRODUCTION WITH SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION IN THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS. 55(4), 1203–1212.
Li, A., Mu, X., Zhao, X., Xu, J., Khayatnezhad, M., & Lalehzari, R. (2021). Developing the non-dimensional framework for water distribution formulation to evaluate sprinkler irrigation*. Irrigation and Drainage, 70(4), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2568.
Li, M., Yan, H., Wang, Y., & Sui, R. (2016). Effect of irrigation amount and uniformity on alfalfa yield and quality under center pivot system. 2016 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2016, 7004, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.20162460633.
Li, Y., & Su, D. (2017). Alfalfa water use and yield under different sprinkler irrigation regimes in North arid regions of China. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 9, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081380.
Maroufpoor, E., Faryabi, A., Ghamarnia, H., & Moshrefi, G. Y. (2010). Evaluation of uniformity coefficients for sprinkler irrigation systems under different field conditions in Kurdistan Province (northwest of Iran). Soil and Water Research, 5(4), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.17221/42/2009-swr.
Masoudi, M., Ebrahimi, A., & Jokar, P. (2018). Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach in the Hendijan plain. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 8(3), 355–364.
Menezes, P. L. de, Azevedo, C. A. V. de, Eyng, E., Dantas Neto, J., & Lima, V. L. A. de. (2015). Artificial neural network model for simulation of water distribution in sprinkle irrigation. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 19(9), 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n9p817-822.
Mengistu Debela, A. (2017). Evaluating the Effect of Dragline Sprinkler Operating Pressure, Riser Height, Nozzle Size and Wind Velocity on Irrigation Water Application under Different Wind Speed Conditions; The case of Tedecha Large Scale Irrigation Scheme. Adama Science and Technology University.
Merriam, J. L., & Keller, J. (1978). Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. In Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. Utah State University.
Mobtaker, H. G., Akram, A., Keyhani, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2011). Energy consumption in alfalfa production: A comparison between two irrigation systems in Iran. African Journal of Plant Science, 5(1), 47–51.
Montazar, A., & Sadeghi, M. (2008). Effects of applied water and sprinkler irrigation uniformity on alfalfa growth and hay yield. Agricultural Water Management, 95(11), 1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.05.005.
Naroua, I., Sinobas, L. R., & Calvo, R. S. (2014). Water use efficiency and water productivity in the Spanish irrigation district " Río Adaja " International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 2(12), 484–491. http://www.journalissues.org/IJAPR/%5Cnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.15739/IJAPR.021.
Ngasoh, F. G., Anyadike, C. C., Mbajiorgu, C. C., & Usman, M. N. (2018). Performance evaluation of sprinkler irrigation system at Mambilla beverage limited, Kakara-Gembu, Taraba state-Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i1.35.
Pitts, D., Peterson, K., Gilbert, G., & Fastenau, R. (1996). Field assessment of irrigation system performance. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 12(3), 307–313.
Salvador, R., Martínez-Cob, A., Cavero, J., & Playán, E. (2011). Seasonal on-farm irrigation performance in the Ebro basin (Spain): Crops and irrigation systems. Agricultural Water Management, 98(4), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.003.
Saretta, E., de Camargo, A. P., Botrel, T. A., Frizzone, J. A., Koech, R., & Molle, B. (2018). Test methods for characterising the water distribution from irrigation sprinklers: Design, evaluation and uncertainty analysis of an automated system. Biosystems Engineering, 169, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.01.011.
Tarjuelo, J. M., Montero, J., Honrubia, F. T., & Calvo, M. A. (1999). I u m s s p ii: i w o f w d. 42(3), 677–689.
Tarjuelo, J. M., Ortega, J. F., Montero, J., & De Juan, J. A. (2000). Modelling evaporation and drift losses in irrigation with medium size impact sprinklers under semi-arid conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 43(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00066-9.
Testa, G., Gresta, F., & Cosentino, S. L. (2011). Dry matter and qualitative characteristics of alfalfa as affected by harvest times and soil water content. European Journal of Agronomy, 34(3), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.12.001.
Urrego-Pereira, Y. F., Martínez-Cob, A., Fernández, V., & Cavero, J. (2013). Daytime sprinkler irrigation effects on net photosynthesis of maize and alfalfa. Agronomy Journal, 105(6), 1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0119.
Wakchaure, G. C., Minhas, P. S., Meena, K. K., Kumar, S., & Rane, J. (2020). Effect of plant growth regulators and deficit irrigation on canopy traits , yield , water productivity and fruit quality of eggplant ( Solanum melongena L .) grown in the water scarce environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 262(October 2019), 110320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110320.
Wang, Y., Janz, B., Engedal, T., & Neergaard, A. De. (2016). Effect of irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on water use efficiency and nitrogen uptake in maize. Agricultural Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.007.
Wang, Y., Li, M., Hui, X., Meng, Y., & Yan, H. (2020). Alfalfa canopy water interception under low-pressure sprinklers. Agricultural Water Management, 230(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105919.
Wang, Y., Liu, F., Andersen, M. N., & Jensen, C. R. (2010). Improved plant nitrogen nutrition contributes to higher water use efficiency in tomatoes under alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Functional Plant Biology, 37(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09181.
Zhang, J., Wang, Q., Pang, X. P., Xu, H. P., Wang, J., Zhang, W. N., & Guo, Z. G. (2021). Effect of partial root-zone drying irrigation (PRDI) on the biomass, water productivity and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus allocations in different organs of alfalfa. Agricultural Water Management, 243(July 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106525.
تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران
دوره 55، شماره 2
اردیبهشت 1403
صفحه 163-177

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار