ارزیابی آب کاربردی و نمایه‌های عملکرد آبیاری در جو زمستانه (مطالعه موردی: استان اردبیل)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج

2 بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی،

چکیده

در دست داشتن برآوردهایی معتبر از آب کاربردی فصلی و نمایه‌های ارزیابی عملکرد آبیاری در شرایط واقعی مدیریت آبیاری و بهره‌برداری اعمال شده در مزارع، پیش‌نیاز بهبود مدیریت منابع آب کشاورزی است. در پژوهش حاضر، آب کاربردی فصلی و نمایه‌های ارزیابی عملکرد آبیاری جو زمستانه در 25 مزرعه تحت مدیریت زارعین واقع در استان اردبیل (شهرستان‌های اردبیل، نمین، نیر و کوثر)، در فصل زراعی 1400-1399 مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. نیاز آبی خالص جو در مزارع مطالعاتی در فصل زراعی 1400-1399 و میانگین 10 ساله آن به‌ترتیب، در دامنه 476 تا 652 و 403 تا 535 میلی‌متر برآورد شد (به‌ترتیب، با میانگین 530 و 449 میلی‌متر). مجموع آب کاربردی و بارش موثر فصلی (I + Pe) و عملکرد دانه جو به‌ترتیب، بین 266 تا 716 میلی‌متر و 14/0 تا 07/4 تن بر هکتار اندازه‌گیری شد (به‌ترتیب، با میانگین وزنی 475 میلی‌متر و 33/2 تن بر هکتار). در نتیجه محدودیت دسترسی به آب آبیاری، 3 تا 91 درصد (با میانگین وزنی 52 درصد) از عملکرد مورد انتظار جو آبی در منطقه (5/4 تن بر هکتار) محقق گردید. اثر سطح مهارت بهره‌برداران، تناوب زراعی، نوع منبع تامین آب آبیاری و روش آبیاری بر نمایه‌های بهره‌وری فیزیکی و اقتصادی آب، معنی‌دار (P < 0.05) بود. نتایج نشان داد در منطقه مطالعاتی، مزارع با منبع آب سطحی از بیشترین آسیب‌پذیری نسبت به شرایط خشکسالی، برخوردار هستند. بهبود انعطاف‌پذیری مدیریت آب در مزارع و کاهش اثرات مخرب روزهای گرم و پرباد در مرحله پرشدن دانه‌ها، می‌تواند بهبود نمایه‌های بهره‌وری آب را در پی داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment of applied water and irrigation performance indicators in winter barley (a case study: Ardabil province, Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farzin Parchami-Araghi 1
  • Seyed Abolghasem Haghayeghi-Moghaddam 2
1 Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran.
2 Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Reliable estimates of the seasonal applied water and irrigation performance assessment indicators under current irrigation and farm management are perquisites for improving water resources management. In this study, seasonal applied water and irrigation performance assessment indicators of winter barley were studied by monitoring 25 farms under actual conditions, in Ardabil Province (Ardabil, Namin, Nir and Kosar counties), Iran, during the growing season 2020-2021. The seasonal estimates of the net irrigation requirement during the growing season 2020-2021 and its 10-year average ranged from 476 to 652 mm and from 403 to 535 mm (with a mean of 530 and 449 mm), respectively, over the study farms. The total sum of seasonal applied water and effective precipitation (I + Pe) and the barley grain yield ranged from 266 to 716 mm and from 0.14 to 4.07 ton ha-1 (with a weighted average, WA, of 475 mm and 2.33 ton ha-1), respectively. As a result of limited irrigation water availability, 3-91% (with a WA of 52%) of the intended yield of irrigated barley in the study area (4.5 ton ha-1) was achieved. Physical and economic water productivity indicators were significantly (P < 0.05) affected by farmer's skill level, crop rotation, type of irrigation water source, and irrigation method. The results indicated that farms with surface water supply showed the highest vulnerability to drought periods. Improving the on-farm water management flexibility and mitigating the negative impacts of hot and windy days during the grain filling stage can improve water productivity indicators in the study area.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Crop Rotation
  • Drought Stress
  • FAO Penman- Monteith
  • Sprinkler Irrigation
  • Surface Irrigation

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

 

Introduction

Intensive and extensive expansion of irrigated agriculture along with increasing urban and industrial water demands have strengthened the concerns of competing users over limited water resources in arid and semi-arid areas, which are fragile and already stressed. In this regard, reliable estimates of the seasonal applied water, I, and irrigation performance assessment indicators under current irrigation and farm management are essential to provide a rationale for decision-makers to formulate adequate water management policies. The objective of this work was to assess the seasonal on-farm irrigation performance of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under actual operation conditions by monitoring 25 farmer farms (including 22 and three farmer farms with surface and solid-set sprinkler irrigation systems, respectively) in Ardabil Province (Ardabil, Namin, Nir and Kosar counties), Iran, during the growing season 2020-2021.

 

Methods

The collected on-farm data included soil texture/salinity, irrigation schedule/depth, irrigation water salinity, crop development stages, crop yield, and field economic data. Weather data were obtained from the nearby synoptic sites, including Ardabil (lat. 31⁰20’ N, long. 48⁰40’E) and Firuzabad (lat. 31⁰20’ N, long. 48⁰40’E). Crop water requirement, ETc, was determined by the FAO Penman-Monteith model. Effective precipitation, Pe, was determined, using the USDA-SCS method. The Doorenbos and Kassam function was used to estimate actual evapotranspiration (ETa). To assess the Irrigation performance in the study fields, the following nine performance indicators were chosen: relative rainfall supply (RRS = Pe / ETc), relative water supply (RWS = [I + Pe] / ETc), relative irrigation supply (RIS = I / [ETc - Pe]), Israelsen's application efficiency (AE), crop yield ratio (CYR, the ratio of actual to intended crop yield), water use efficiency (WPET), irrigation water productivity (WPI), total water (irrigation + effective precipitation, I + Pe) productivity (WPI+Pe), and economic water productivity (WP$).

 

Results and Discussion

The seasonal estimates of the net irrigation requirement for barely, In, during the growing season 2020-2021 and its 10-year average ranged from 476 to 652 mm and from 403 to 535 mm with a mean of 530 and 449 mm, respectively, over the study farms. The total applied water (I + Pe) and the grain yield ranged from 266 to 716 mm and from 0.14 to 4.07 ton ha-1, with a weighted average, WA, of 475 mm and 2.33 ton ha-1, respectively. The range of RRS, RAW, and RIS indicators were 0.10-0.16, 0.46-1.18, and 0.39-1.21, with a WA of 0.12, 0.73, and 0.70, respectively. CYR ranged from 0.03 to 0.91 (with a WA of 0.52). These results indicate that all study farms experienced varying degrees of deficit irrigation. The mean Israelsen's application efficiency (AE) over initial, development, mid-, and late-season growth stages were obtained 9, 82, 97, and 100%, respectively. The range of WPET, WPI, and WPI+Pe were 0.83-1.14, 0.05-1.38, and 0.04-0.99 kg m-3, with a WA of 0.96, 0.59, and 0.48 kg m-3, respectively. WP$ range from -14.35 × 103 to 59.12 × 103 Rial m-3 with a WA of 21.47 × 103 Rial m-3. WPI, WPI+Pe, and WP$ indicators were significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the farmer's skill level, crop rotation, type of irrigation water source, and irrigation method. Farms with surface water supply showed the highest vulnerability to drought periods, compared to farms with well and multi-source combined (both surface and well) water supplies. Improving the on-farm water management flexibility and mitigating the negative impacts of hot and windy days during the grain filling stage can improve water productivity indicators in the study area.

Ababaei, B. and Ramezani-Etedali, H. (2017). Water footprint assessment of main cereals in Iran. Agricultural water management, 179, 401-411.
Abbasi, F., Sohrab, F. and Abbasi, N. (2017). Evaluation of Irrigation Efficiencies in Iran. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 17(67), 113-120. (in Persian).
Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Hatami, F., Abdshah, H. and Kazemian, A. (2020). Iran agricultural statistical yearbook (2019-2020), Volume I: Agricultural crops. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, Tehran, Iran., 89 pp. (in Persian)
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 301 pp.
Andrés, R., Martín-Ramos, P. and Cuchí, J.A. (2020). Water Balance and Nitrate and Salt Exports from a Saline–Sodic Irrigation District in Castelflorite (Huesca, NE Spain). Agronomy, 10(2), 165.
Ararssa, A.A., Gebremariam, A.G., Mulat, W.L. and Mekonnen, M.M. (2019). Effects of Irrigation Management on Yield and Water Productivity of Barley Hordeum vulgare in the Upper Blue Nile Basin: Case Study in Northern Gondar. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 4(2-3), 113-121.
Bos, M.G., Kselik, R.A.L., Allen, R.G. and Molden, D. (2008). Water requirements for irrigation and the environment. Springer, New York, USA.
Bos, M.G., Murray-Rust, D.H., Merrey, D.J., Johnson, H.G. and Snellen, W.B. (1994). Methodologies for assessing performance of irrigation and drainage management. Irrigation and drainage systems, 7, 231-261.
Clemmens, A.J. and Burt, C.M. (1997). Accuracy of irrigation efficiency estimates. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage engineering, 123(6), 443-453.
Cossani, C.M., Slafer, G.A. and Savin, R. (2009). Yield and biomass in wheat and barley under a range of conditions in a Mediterranean site. Field Crops Research, 112(2-3), 205-213.
Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H. (1979). Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Eslami, A. (2016). Irrigation water measurement tools in surface irrigation methods. Agricultural Research, Training and Extension Organization, Fars Province Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center, Technical Journal, No. 44, Shiraz, Iran, 24 pp. (In Persian)
Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Data (FAOSTAT). (2023). FAO Statistical Data. (Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E)
Ghasemi-Aghbolaghi, S. and Sepaskhah, A.R. (2018). Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Response to Partial Root Drying Irrigation, Planting Method and Nitrogen Application Rates. International Journal of Plant Production, 12(1), 13-24.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Mostashari-Rad, F., Saber, Z., Chau, K.-w. and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2020). Application of photovoltaic system to modify energy use, environmental damages and cumulative exergy demand of two irrigation systems-A case study: Barley production of Iran. Renewable Energy, 160, 1316-1334.
Gholami, Z., Ebrahimian, H. and Noory, H. (2015). Investigation of irrigation water productivity in sprinkler and surface irrigation systems (case study: Qazvin Plain). Journal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 39(3), 135-146. (in Persian)
Hussain, G. and Al-Jaloud, A.A. (1998). Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of barley in Saudi Arabia. Agricultural Water Management, 36(1), 55-70.
Israelsen, O.W. (1932). Irrigation Principles and Practices. John Wiley and Sons, NewYork.
Katerji, N., Mastrorilli, M., Van Hoorn, J.W., Lahmer, F.Z., Hamdy, A. and Oweis, T. (2009). Durum wheat and barley productivity in saline–drought environments. European Journal of Agronomy, 31(1), 1-9.
Lorite, I.J., Mateos, L. and Fereres, E. (2004). Evaluating irrigation performance in a Mediterranean environment: II. Variability among crops and farmers. Irrigation Science, 23, 85-92.
Maas, E.V. (1990). Crop salt tolerance. In: Tanji, K.K. (Ed.), Agricultural salinity assessment and management. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering practice, No 71, New York, USA.
Malano, H.M. and Burton, M. (2001). Guidelines for benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector. (International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage). FAO, Rome, Italy, 44 pp.
Martínez-Romero, A., López-Urrea, R., Montoya, F., Pardo, J.J. and Domínguez, A. (2021). Optimization of irrigation scheduling for barley crop, combining AquaCrop and MOPECO models to simulate various water-deficit regimes. Agricultural Water Management, 258, 107219.
Massey, J.H., Stiles, C.M., Epting, J.W., Powers, R.S., Kelly, D.B., Bowling, T.H., Janes, C.L. and Pennington, D.A. (2017). Long-term measurements of agronomic crop irrigation made in the Mississippi delta portion of the lower Mississippi River Valley. Irrigation Science, 35(4), 297-313.
Mokari-Ghahroodi, E., Noory, H. and Liaghat, A. (2015). Performance evaluation study and hydrologic and productive analysis of irrigation systems at the Qazvin irrigation network (Iran). Agricultural Water Management, 148, 189-195.
Molden, D., Murray-Rust, H., Sakthivadivel, R. and Makin, I. (2003). A water-productivity framework for understanding and action. In: Kijne, W., Barkers, R. and Molden, D. (Eds.), Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvements. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Molden, D., Oweis, T., Steduto, P., Bindraban, P., Hanjra, M.A. and Kijne, J. (2010). Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution. Agricultural water management, 97(4), 528-535.
Morell, F.J., Lampurlanés, J., Álvaro-Fuentes, J. and Cantero-Martínez, C. (2011). Yield and water use efficiency of barley in a semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystem: Long-term effects of tillage and N fertilization. Soil and Tillage Research, 117, 76-84.
Moreno-Pérez, M.F. and Roldán-Cañas, J. (2013). Assessment of irrigation water management in the Genil-Cabra (Córdoba, Spain) irrigation district using irrigation indicators. Agricultural water management, 120, 98-106.
Naroua, I., Rodríguez Sinobas, L. and Sánchez Calvo, R. (2014). Water use efficiency and water productivity in the Spanish irrigation district "Río Adaja". International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 2(12), 484-491.
Parchami-Araghi, F., Mirlatifi, S.M., Ghorbani Dashtaki, S., Vazifehdoust, M. and Sadeghi-Lari, A. (2016). Development of a Disaggregation Framework toward the Estimation of Subdaily Reference Evapotranspiration: 1- Performance Comparison of Some Daily-to-subdaily Weather Data Disaggregation Models. Journal of Water and Soil, 30(2), 334-354. (in Persian)
Pardo, J.J., Martínez-Romero, A., Léllis, B.C., Tarjuelo, J.M. and Domínguez, A. (2020). Effect of the optimized regulated deficit irrigation methodology on water use in barley under semiarid conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 228, 105925.
Perry, C. (2011). Accounting for water use: Terminology and implications for saving water and increasing production. Agricultural Water Management, 98(12), 1840-1846.
Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Emam, Y., Kazemeini, S.A. and Dehghany, F. (2017). Effect of Irrigation Water Salinity on Soil Moisture and Salinity during Growing Season, Barley Yield, and Its Water Productivity. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 31(2), 155-166. (in Persian)
Salvador, R., Bautista-Capetillo, C., Burguete, J., Zapata, N., Serreta, A. and Playán, E. (2009). A photographic method for drop characterization in agricultural sprinklers. Irrigation science, 27(4), 307-317.
Salvador, R., Martínez-Cob, A., Cavero, J. and Playán, E. (2011). Seasonal on-farm irrigation performance in the Ebro basin (Spain): Crops and irrigation systems. Agricultural Water Management, 98(4), 577-587.
Segovia-Cardozo, D.A., Rodríguez-Sinobas, L. and Zubelzu, S. (2019). Water use efficiency of corn among the irrigation districts across the Duero river basin (Spain): Estimation of local crop coefficients by satellite images. Agricultural water management, 212, 241-251.
Sharafizadeh, M., Jazayeri, M.R., Nikkhah, H.R. and Roostaei, M. (2020). Agronomic and morphological characteristics of barley cultivars. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute, Karaj, Iran., 252 pp. (in Persian)
Stambouli, T., Zapata, N. and Faci, J.M. (2012). Irrigation patterns and scheduling of a telecontrolled irrigation district in northeastern Spain. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 138(6), 503-516.
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, E. and Raes, D. (2012). Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 66.
Todorovic, M., Karic, B. and Pereira, L.S. (2013). Reference evapotranspiration estimate with limited weather data across a range of Mediterranean climates. Journal of Hydrology, 481, 166-176.
USDA-NRCS. (1993). Chapter 2: Irrigation water requirements, Part 623: Irrigation. National Engineering Handbook, United States Depart-ment of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. (Available at: ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/wntsc/waterMgt/irrigation/NEH15/ch2.pdf).
United States Salinity Laboratory Staff (USSLS). (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, Agriculture Handbook No 60, Washington DC, USA, pp. 160.
Wilcox, L.V. (1955). Classification and use of the irrigation waters. US Department of Agriculture Circular No 969, Washington, DC, pp. 19.
Yang, K. and Koike, T. (2005). A general model to estimate hourly and daily solar radiation for hydrological studies. Water Resources Research, 41, W10403.
Zamani, O., Mortazavi, S.A. and Balali, H. (2014). Economical Water Productivity of Agricultural Products in Bahar Plain, Hamadan. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 28(1), 51-62.