تحلیل ذینفعان و نهاد آب در راستای پایداری منابع آب (مورد مطالعه حوضه آبریز زاینده‌رود)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

3 گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

شرایط اقلیمی و خشکسالی­ سال­های اخیر، حوضه آبریز زاینده‌رود را با چالش پایداری منابع آب روبه­رو ساخته است. پایداری منابع آب با نهادهای متناسب با شرایط حوضه و ذینفعان مشارکت‌کننده تحقق پیدا خواهد کرد. هدف این تحقیق شناسایی نهاد آب و مؤلفه­های آن در حوضه­ی آبریز زاینده‌رود بود. جامعه آماری این تحقیق کارشناسان و متخصصان آب حوضه­ی آبریز زاینده‌رود بودند(N=312). ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در بخش کمی پرسشنامه و در بخش کیفی مصاحبه ساختاریافته بود. روش تعیین حجم نمونه در بخش کمی فرمول کوکران بود که بر اساس آن 173 نفر تعیین گردید. رویکرد نمونه‌گیری در بخش کیفی هدفمند بود که با روش گلوله برفی 15 نفر گزینش شد. برای تحلیل داده­ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و دیاگرام رنگین‌کمان استفاده شد. یافته­ها نشان داد که شورای عالی آب، استانداری‌ها، وزارتخانه‌های نیرو و جهاد کشاورزی و سازمان­های تابع آنها جزء کنشگران کلیدی در سطح حوضه هستند.  همچنین نتایج نشان داد؛ نهاد آب دارای سه مؤلفه‌ی اداره­ی آب، سیاست­ آب و قوانین آب است که ضرایب استانداردشده‌ی آن‌ها به ترتیب 80/0، 64/0، 53/0 بدست آمد. هر سه مؤلفه‌ی ذکرشده در سطح اطمینان 99 درصد معنی­دار بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Water Stakeholders and Institution Analysis for Sustainability of Agricultural Water Resources (Case Study Zayandehrud Catchment Area)

نویسندگان [English]

  • jamshid Eghbali 1
  • Khalil Kalantari 2
  • Ali Asadi 2
  • mohammad javad javid, 3
1 Department of Agricultural Development and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Department of Agricultural Development and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Climate and drought conditions in recent years have faced the Zayandehrud catchment area with the challenge of water resources sustainability. The sustainability of water resources will be achieved by institutions appropriate to the basin conditions and stakeholders. The purpose of this study was to identify the water boady and its components in Zayandehrood catchment. Statistical population of this study were Water experts of Zayandehrud catchment (N=312). Data collection tools were questionnaire in the quantitative part and structured interview in the qualitative part. The sampling size in quantitative part was determined to be 173 individuals using Cochran formula. The sampling approach in the qualitative part was purposeful and 15 individuals were selected by snowball method. Data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling (lisrel8.8 software) and the rainbow diagram. The findings indicate that the Ministry of Energy, the Agricultural Jihad and their subordinate organizations are the key players at the basin level. The results also showed that the water institution has three components of water management, water policy and water laws, whose standardized coefficients were 0.64, 0.53 and 0.80, respectively. All three components were significant at 99% confidence level.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Water Institution
  • Sheikhabahi Scroll
  • Rainbow Diagram
  • Commons
  • Zayandeh River
Agrawal, A. (2007). Forests, governance, and sustainability: common property theory and its contributions. International journal of the commons, 1(1), 111-136
Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1998). Division of the commons: a partial assessment of the new institutional economics of land rights. American journal of agricultural economics, 80(3), 644-650
Bastakoti, R. C., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2012). Rules and collective action: An institutional analysis of the performance of irrigation systems in Nepal. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8(2), 225-246
Bayat, P., Sabouhi, M., Keikha, A., Ahmad Pur, M., Karami, E.(2015) Concept of Water Institution and Take a Look at the Experiences in Water Institutional Reforms in Different Countries, Strategic and Macroeconomic Quarterly, 3 (11) – 115-137
Bell, R., Gali, J., Gretton, P., & Redmond, I. (2007). The responsiveness of Australian farm performance to changes in irrigation water use and trade. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, 14th to 16th February 2007
Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society. Cambridge University Press 2005
Blomquist, W., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Deliberation, learning, and institutional change: the evolution of institutions in judicial settings. Constitutional Political Economy, 19(3), 180-202.
Blomquist, T., Hällgren, M., Nilsson, A., & Söderholm, A. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project management journal, 41(1), 5-16.
Bruns, B. R., & Meinzen-Dick, R. S. (2000) Negotiating water rights: Vistaar Publicationscom/e.o/ mesopotamia.htm
Commons, J.R. (1992). Institutions and Economic Theory.American Economist: 3-6
armona, G., Varela-Ortega, C., & Bromley, J. (2013). Participatory modelling to support decision making in water management under uncertainty: two comparative case studies in the Guadiana river basin, Spain. Journal of environmental management, 128, 400-412.  
Crawford, S. , and Ostrom, E. 1995. A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review 89 (3): 582-600
Dolsak, N., & Ostrom, E. (2003). The challenges of the commons. Science, 3-34
FAO. (2001). The State of Food and Agriculture 2001 (No. 33). Food & Agriculture Org.
Frederick, K. D., & Policy, R. (2006). 24 Marketing Water The Obstacles and the Impetus. The RFF Reader in Environmental, 136.
Hajian,N. (2013) Estimating the amount of water for farmers in Zayandehrud basin based on existing laws and guidelines, the first national conference on water and agricultural resources challenges
Hatami yazd, A. Davari, K., Yousofi. A. Ghahraman,  H (2017) Identification of the managerial conflicts among the Actors of water resources through analyzing their cognitive maps (Case Study: stakeholders of Mashhad plain). Iran-Water Resources Research, 13(2), 1-17
Henriksen, H. J., & Barlebo, H. C. (2008). Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1025-1036.
Hodgson, S. (2006). Modern water rights: theory and practice: Food & Agriculture Org
Hosseini Abari, H. (2000), Zayandehrud from hotbed to marsh. flowers Publishing, Isfahan
Iglesias, A., & Garrote, L. (2015). Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe. Agricultural water management, 155, 113-124.
Iran Water Resources Management Company, (2019)Basic Office of Water Resources Studies, Daily Rain Collection Report by Separate First and Second Floor Basins, Accessed 4 - 12 – 2019
Kalantari. Kh. (2011) Modeling Structural Equations in Socio-Economic Research, Saba Culture Publishing, Tehran
Krysanova, V., Dickens, C., Timmerman, J., Varela-Ortega, C., Schlüter, M., Roest, K., ... & de Pedraza Carrera, J. (2010). Cross-comparison of climate change adaptation strategies across large river basins in Europe, Africa and Asia. Water Resources Management, 24(14), 4121-4160.
Khodadadi, S.A., Yasi, M., Monem, M.J. (2018) Performance Evaluation and Provide Optimal Water Delivery Pattern in Zarrineh River Irrigation Network, Water and Irrigation Management, 7 (1), 119-105
Kimenyi, M. S. (2018). Devolution and development: Governance prospects in decentralizing states. Routledge.
Livingston, D., Stenekes, N., Colebatch, H., Waite, T., & Ashbolt, N. (2005). Governance of water assets: A reframing for sustainability. Australian Water Association, 32(8), 19
Molle, F. (2004). Defining water rights: by prescription or negotiation? , 6(3), 207-227
Nemarundwe, N., & Kozanayi, W. (2003). Institutional arrangements for water resource use: A case study from southern Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(1), 193-206
North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1977). The first economic revolution. Economic History Review, 30(2), 229-241
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, New York
Pink, R. M. (2016) Water Rights in China and India: A Human Security Perspective. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 43(2), 19-35.
Regional water company of Esfahan (2019)Investigating the changes in climatic parameters of Isfahan province, group of Combination and Water balance
Rosegrant, M. W., Cai, X., & Cline, S. A. (2002). World water and food to 2025: dealing with scarcity. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
Saleth, R. M. and Dinar. A  ( 2004) Linkages within institutional structure: an empirical analysis of water institutions. J. Inst. Econ. 4 (3): 375-401.
Saravanan, V. (2008). A systems approach to unravel complex water management institutions. Ecological Complexity, 5(3), 202-215
Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2000). Local communities, policy prescriptions, and watershed management in Arizona, California, and Colorado. Paper presented at the Eighth Conference of the Int
Schlager, E., & Heikkila, T. (2009). Resolving water conflicts: a comparative analysis of interstate river compacts. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 367-392
Shahbazkhania, A., Samani, J.M. And Razavi Tusi, S.L. (2017) Evaluation of effective criteria in prioritizing some irrigation and drainage networks of Karkheh river basin with the aim of water allocation, water management and irrigation, 7 (1), 167-181
Wheeler, S., Zuo, A., & Bjornlund, H. (2013). Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 537-547
World Health Organization, & UNICEF. (2013). Progress on sanitation and drinking-water. World Health Organization.
Zulfiqari, Y. (2011), Water Rights, Volume One, Second Edition, Majd Publishing, Tehran