تخمین تابع تولید آب-نیتروژن دانه سویا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

2 گروه مهندسی آبیاری و آبادانی، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشگاه تهران

4 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده مهندسی آب و خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

چکیده

با توجه به محدودیت منابع آب، کم‌آبیاری می‌تواند یکی از روش‌های مناسب در این شرایط باشد. هدف این پژوهش بهینه‌سازی مصرف آب و تعیین حد بهینه نیتروژن به‌صورت همزمان می‌باشد. در این پژوهش دو راهبرد کم‌آبیاری 75 (I2)، 50 (I3) و 25 (I4) درصد آب مورد نیاز و آبیاری کامل (I1) و تیمارهای مختلف نیتروژن با کاربرد 150 (N1)، 5/112 (N2) و 75 (N3) کیلوگرم در هکتار مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. بهینه‌سازی آب و نیتروژن نشان داد که از میان توابع تولید خطی ساده، تابع کاب داگلاس، درجه دومو متعالی، تابع تولید مناسب سویا، مدل متعالی می‌باشد. میزان بهینه آب و نیتروژن تحت شرایط تنش آب-نیتروژن برای گیاه سویا در دو سال به ترتیب 230 و 5/216 میلی‌متر آب و 150 کیلوگرم نیتروژن برآورد شد. نتایج نشان داد، تیمار N3 در حالت کم‌آبیاری I2 نسبت به روش آبیاری کامل، 28/33% افزایش تولید داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Estimation of soybean water-nitrogen production function

نویسندگان [English]

  • Lida Asadi 1
  • Mojtab Khoshravesh 1
  • Masoud PourGholam 2
  • Abdolmajid Liaghat 3
  • MohammadReza Youri 4
1 Department of Water engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
2 Dept. of Irrigation & Reclamation Eng., Faculty of Agriculture Engineering & Technology, University of Tehran
3 University of Tehran
4 Department of Water engineering, Faculty of water & soil Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of gorgan University
چکیده [English]

Due to the limited water resources, the deficit irrigation would be one of the most relevant methods in this situation. The purpose of this study was to optimize the water consumption and nitrogen level simultaneously. In this research, two different irrigation strategies of 75% (I2), 50% (I3) and 25% (I4) of water requirement and full irrigation (I1) and different nitrogen treatments with application of 150 (N1), 112.5 (N2) and 75 (N3) Kg/ha was investigated on yield production. Optimization of water and nitrogen showed that the proper yield function of soybean is the transcendental model among linear, Cobb-Douglas, quadratic and transcendental models. The optimum water and nitrogen levels of soybeans under water-nitrogen stress conditions was estimated 230 and 216.5 mm of water and 150 kg of nitrogen in two years. The results showed that the yield production was increased by 33.28% in N3 with deficit irrigation treatment (I2) as compared with full irrigation method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Optimization
  • Yield
  • Deficit irrigation
  • Transcendental Model
Abayomi A.Y. (2008) Comparative growth and grain yield response of early and late soybean maturity groups to induced soil moisture stress at different growth stage. Word Journal of Agriculture science. 4(1), 71-78.
Ahmadi, K., Gholizade, H., Ebadzade, H., Hatami, F., Fazli Estabragh, M., Hosseinpoor, R., Kazemian, A. and Rafi’ee, M. (2016) Agricultural Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture Press. Tehran. 163 p. (In Farsi)
Azizian, A., Sepaskhah, A. R., Tavakkoli, A.R. and Zibaie, M. (2007) Economic optimization of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer for wheat in different rainfall amounts (in Maragheh region). Journal of Water and Soil Science (Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources). 4 (1), 45-57. (In Farsi)
Barati, V. and Ghadiri, H. (2016) Effects of Drought Stress and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield, Yield Components and Protein Content of Two Barley Cultivars. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 20, 191-206. (In Farsi)
Das, H.P. (2003) Water use efficiency of soybean and its yield response to evapotranspiration and rainfall. Journal of Agriculture Physics. 3: 1-2, 35-39.
Draper, N., and H. Smith. (1981) Applied regression analysis. New York, J. Wiley and Sons.
English, M.J., Musick, J.T. and Murty, V.N. (1990) Deficit irrigation. In: Hoffman, G.J., Howell, T.A., and Solomon, K.H. (Eds.). Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan. pp. 631-66
Fisher, W.D. (1961) A note on curve fitting with minimum deviations by linear programming. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 56:359-362.
Garcia, A., Persson, T., Guerra, L.C., and Hoogenboom, G. (2010) Response of soybean genotypes to different irrigation regimes in a humid region of the southeastern USA. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 981-987.
Ghajar Sepanloo, M. and Bahmanyar, M. A. (2004) Effect of irrigation in different stages of growth on yield, water use efficiency and harvest index of soybean cultivars in Mazandaran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of the Caspian Sea. 2, 79-89. (In Farsi)
Ghobadi, R., Shirkhani, A. and Jalilian, A. (2015) Effects of Water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, its components, water and nitrogen use efficiency of corn (Zea mays L.) cv. SC. 704. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 104, 79-87. (In Farsi)
Heady, E.O., and J.L., Dillon. (1988) Agricultural production functions. New Delhi, Ludhiana, Kalyani publishers, 667 pp.
Khajepoor, M. R. (2006) Industrial Plants. Academic Center Of Education Culture and Research Press (Isfahan Branch). 564 p. (In Farsi)
Kheyraie, J., Tavakkoli, A.R., Entesari, M. R. and Salamat, M. R. (1996) Deficit irrigation Instructions. IRNCID Press. Tehran. 218 p. (In Farsi)
Kiani, A. and Raeesi, S. (2013) Investigating the water use efficiency of some soybean cultivars under different amounts of irrigation water. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, Vol. 20(5), 2013, 79-89. (In Farsi)
Kipkorir KK, Reas D and Massawe B, (2002) Seasonal water production functions and yield response factors for maize and onion in perkerra, Kenya. Agric. Water Manage. 56:229-240.
Kirnak, H., Dogan, E. and H. Turkoglu. (2010) Effect of drip irrigation intensity on soybean seed yield and quality in the semi-arid Harran plain, Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(4):1208-1217.
Liu, M. and Li, D. (2010) An Analysis on Total Factor Productivity and Influencing Factors of Soybean in China. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2, 2: 158-163.
MirAkhori, M., Paknejad, F., Ardakani, M., Moradi, F., Nazeri, P. and Nasri, M. (2010) Effect of methanol spray on yield and soybean yield components. Journal of Agroecology. 2, 2, 236-244. (In Farsi)
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2017) World Agricultural Production. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from https://apps.fas.usda.gov
Oweis, T., M., Pala, and J. Ryan. (1998) Stabilizing rainfed wheat yields with supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy Journal. 90:672-681.
Sepaskhah, A. R., Tavakkoli, A.R. and Moosavi, F. (2006) Deficit irrigation. IRNCID Press. Tehran. 287 p. (In Farsi)
Shams Beyranvand, M., Boroomandnasab, S. and Maleki, A. (2014) Effect of Different Irrigation Regimes on Yield Water Use Efficiency and Harvest Index of Soybean Cultivars in Khorramabad. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering. 37, 3, 13-20. (In Farsi)
Wagner, H.M. (1959) Linear programming and regression analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54.206212.