تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران

تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران

مدلسازی رطوبت خاک و بهبود وضوح مکانی داده‌های ماهواره SMAP در مقیاس مزرعه با استفاده از داده‌های سنجش از دور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
محدثه السادات فخار 1
عباس کاویانی 2
1 گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران
2 عضو هیات علمی گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران
10.22059/ijswr.2026.405920.670047
چکیده
امروزه برآورد رطوبت خاک با استفاده از ماهواره SMAP در مقیاس زمانی کمتر از سه روز امکان‌پذیر شده است اما اندازه‌ پیکسل سایز‌های این داده بزرگ است. در این پژوهش رویکردی برای کاهش مقیاس رطوبت خاک SMAP با ترکیب Sentinel-1 SAR و داده‌های MODIS به کارگرفته است لذا با هدف برآورد رطوبت خاک در مزارع ذرت به برداشت نمونه رطوبت خاک گیاه ذرت از 5 مزرعه در کشت و صنعت مگسال واقع در دشت قزوین در دوره کشت تابستان 1401 پرداخته شد. در این پژوهش از تکنیک‌ جنگل تصادفی برای تخمین رطوبت خاک، استفاده شد. در این پژوهش شش سناریو تعریف شد که هر سناریو بیانگر یک ترکیب متفاوت از شاخص‌های استخراج‌شده از داده‌های Sentinel-1 و MODIS به‌عنوان ورودی مدل جنگل تصادفی برای کاهش مقیاس رطوبت خاک SMAP است. نتایج به دست آمده نشان می‌دهد که در بین سناریو‌های مورد بررسی در مزرعه یک (M1)، سناریو RF6 با مقدار R=0.97 و (cm3/cm3) RMSE=0.04 بیشترین میزان همبستگی را داشته است. بعد از سناریو RF6، سناریو RF5 با مقدار R= 0.96 از همبستگی بالایی برخوردار است. از جمله دلایل افزایش میزان همبستگی در سناریو‌های RF5 و RF6 را می‌توان به وجود شاخص LAI و نقشه کاربری اراضی اشاره کرد. در بررسی همبستگی میان شاخص سطح برگ و رطوبت خاک اندازه‌گیری شده مشخص شد که این شاخص با مقدار R= 0.88 میزان همبستگی بالایی را با مقادیر رطوبت خاک دارد. به دلیل محدود بودن داده‌های نقطه‌ای رطوبت خاک و نیاز به تهیه نقشه‌های پیوسته برای پایش مزارع کوچک، به‌کارگیری روش‌های ریزمقیاس‌سازی می‌تواند دقت داده‌های SMAP را به‌طور مؤثری افزایش داده و آن را به ابزاری کارآمد و مقرون‌به‌صرفه برای مدیریت و پژوهش‌های کشاورزی تبدیل کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
جنگل تصادفی
رطوبت خاک
ریزمقیاس‌سازی
SMAP
MODIS
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Soil Moisture Modeling and Spatial Resolution Enhancement of SMAP Satellite Data at the Farm Scale Using Remote Sensing Data

نویسندگان English

Mohadese sadat Fakhar 1
Abbas Kaviani 2
1 . Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Water Eng. and Science Dept., Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده English

Nowadays, soil moisture estimation using SMAP satellite data is feasible at a temporal resolution of less than three days; however, the spatial resolution of these data is relatively coarse. In this study, a downscaling approach was applied to enhance the spatial resolution of SMAP soil moisture by integrating Sentinel-1 SAR and MODIS data. The study focused on estimating soil moisture in maize fields through field measurements collected from five farms at the Megsal Agro-Industrial Complex in the Qazvin Plain during the summer growing season of 2022. A Random Forest (RF) modeling approach was employed to estimate soil moisture, and six scenarios were defined, each representing a different combination of indices derived from Sentinel-1 and MODIS data as inputs to the RF model for SMAP soil moisture downscaling. The results indicate that among the evaluated scenarios, scenario RF6 in Farm 1 (M1) achieved the highest correlation with in-situ soil moisture (R = 0.97) and RMSE = 0.04 (cm³/cm³), followed by scenario RF5 with R = 0.96. The superior performance of RF5 and RF6 is attributed to the inclusion of the Leaf Area Index (LAI) and land cover maps. Moreover, the correlation between measured soil moisture and LAI was high (R = 0.88), highlighting the importance of vegetation indices in soil moisture estimation. Considering the limited availability of point-based soil moisture data and the need for continuous maps to monitor small farms, applying downscaling techniques can significantly improve the accuracy of SMAP data, making it a cost-effective and efficient tool for agricultural management and research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Downscaling
MODIS
Random Forest
SMAP
Soil Moisture

Introduction

Soil moisture is one of the primary determinants governing energy exchange between the land surface and atmosphere, influencing plant growth, crop water use, and hydrological responses. In agricultural environments, particularly in semi-arid regions such as the Qazvin Plain of Iran, the precise monitoring of surface soil moisture is fundamental for optimizing irrigation practices and maintaining crop productivity under increasing water stress conditions. Recent advances in satellite remote sensing have enabled large-scale estimation of soil moisture; however, limitations remain regarding the spatial resolution of passive microwave sensors such as the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. Although SMAP provides soil moisture observations with a revisit frequency of less than three days, its coarse spatial resolution (~9 km) restricts its applicability for field-scale agricultural monitoring where the spatial variability of soil moisture is significant.

To address this limitation, downscaling methods integrating Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) observations and optical vegetation indices have been developed to enhance SMAP spatial resolution without compromising temporal continuity. Sentinel-1 SAR provides backscatter information sensitive to surface roughness and soil moisture, while MODIS products offer vegetation and land surface parameters that characterize canopy cover, evapotranspiration, and water retention. In this study, a multi-sensor data fusion and machine-learning–based downscaling approach was applied to estimate soil moisture at field scale in maize farms within the Megsal agricultural complex. Specifically, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm was used due to its capacity to model nonlinear relationships and its robustness in handling high-dimensional predictor variables.

Materials and Methods

Study Area and Field Data

The study was conducted in five maize fields located in the Megsal agricultural complex in the Qazvin Plain during the 2022 growing season. The region is characterized by a semi-arid climate with warm summers, and irrigation is primarily supplied by groundwater. Soil texture across the fields is predominantly loam. Soil moisture measurements were collected from each field at a depth of 0–30 cm using the HH2 moisture probe. Sampling was repeated throughout the growing season to capture temporal fluctuations associated with irrigation events and plant development.

Remote Sensing Data

Three categories of remotely sensed data were employed:

Data Source

Parameter

Spatial/Temporal Resolution

SMAP L3

Soil moisture

9 km / 2–3 days

Sentinel-1 SAR

σ⁰VV backscatter

~20 m / 6–12 days

MODIS

NDVI, EVI, NDWI, LAI, LST, Albedo

250–1000 m / 8–16 days

Additionally, elevation and slope were derived from SRTM DEM to incorporate topographic variation influencing water redistribution.

Downscaling Modeling Scenarios

Six predictive model scenarios (RF1–RF6) were developed based on incremental combinations of remote sensing predictors, ranging from minimal configurations (LST and NDVI) to extended models incorporating vegetation indices, radar backscatter, land cover type, and terrain parameters. The Random Forest algorithm was implemented in the Google Earth Engine cloud environment. Model performance was assessed against ground measurements using:

·         Correlation coefficient (R)

·         Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)

·         Mean Absolute Error (MAE)

·         Normalized RMSE (NRMSE)

Results

Model performance varied substantially among the tested scenarios. Scenarios integrating vegetation structural parameters and land cover information (RF5 and RF6) consistently produced the highest accuracy across all fields. In Field M1, RF6 yielded the strongest performance (R = 0.97; RMSE = 0.04 cm³/cm³), indicating near‐exact correspondence to measured soil moisture. RF5 followed closely (R = 0.96), reflecting the influence of canopy structure on soil moisture retention.

The contribution of LAI was particularly significant, exhibiting a strong relationship with measured soil moisture (R = 0.88). This highlights the role of vegetation biomass in regulating canopy shading and transpiration dynamics, which in turn affects surface moisture availability. Scenarios lacking vegetation parameters (RF1–RF3) demonstrated lower accuracy (R = 0.51–0.75), confirming that soil temperature and backscatter alone are insufficient to represent field-scale moisture variability, especially during mid-season crop growth.

Temporal comparisons further revealed that downscaled soil moisture estimates effectively captured the progression of the maize growth cycle, including moisture increases following irrigation and declines during periods of high atmospheric demand. Models performed more consistently in fields with uniform irrigation pressure (linear systems) compared to strip irrigation fields where uneven water distribution increased spatial heterogeneity.

 

Conclusion

This research demonstrates that integrating Sentinel-1 SAR and MODIS-derived vegetation and surface parameters with SMAP soil moisture significantly improves spatial resolution and estimation accuracy at the field scale. The Random Forest–based downscaling approach produced high agreement with measured soil moisture, particularly when LAI and land cover information were included. The proposed approach offers a cost-effective and operationally feasible framework for precision irrigation planning, crop monitoring, and hydrological assessment in semi-arid agricultural systems. The results underscore the value of multi-sensor data fusion in bridging the gap between regional-scale satellite products and field-level management needs.

Funding

The study was funded by the Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Financial support for this research was provided by the Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University, through the first author's thesis research grant as well as research grants awarded to the co-authors.

Authorship contribution

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, M.S. Fakhr and A. Kaviani; methodology, M.S. Fakhr and A. Kaviani; software, M. S. Fakhar; validation, M.S. Fakhr and A. Kaviani; formal analysis, M. S. Fakhar; investigation, M. S. Fakhar; resources, M. S. Fakhar; data curation, M.S. Fakhr and A. Kaviani; writing—original draft preparation, M. S. Fakhar; writing—review and editing, A. Kaviani; visualization, A. Kaviani; supervision, A. Kaviani; project administration, A. Kaviani; funding acquisition.

First author (graduate student): Sample preparation, conducting the experiments, data collection, performing calculations, statistical data analysis, interpretation of the results, and preparation of the original draft of the manuscript.

Second author (thesis supervisor): Study conceptualization and design, supervision of the research process, review and verification of the results, and revision, editing, and finalization of the manuscript.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

No artificial intelligence tools were used in the article writing process.

Data availability statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Vice-Chancellor for Research of Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU) for the financial support of this study.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, and any form of misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acharya, U., Daigh, A. L. M., & Oduor, P. G. (2021). Machine learning for predicting field soil moisture using soil, crop, and nearby weather station data in the Red River Valley of the North. Soil Systems, 5(4), 57.
Adab, H., Morbidelli, R., Saltalippi, C., Moradian, M., & Ghalhari, G. A. F. (2020). Machine learning to estimate surface soil moisture from remote sensing data. Water, 12(11), 3223.
Ansari, S., & Deshmukh, R. R. (2017). Estimation of soil moisture content: A review. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 12(3), 571–577.
Araya, S. N., Fryjoff-Hung, A., Anderson, A., Viers, J. H., & Ghezzehei, T. A. (2021). Advances in soil moisture retrieval from multispectral remote sensing using unoccupied aircraft systems and machine learning techniques. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(5), 2739–2758.
Babaeian, E., Sadeghi, M., Jones, S. B., Montzka, C., Vereecken, H., & Tuller, M. (2019). Ground, proximal, and satellite remote sensing of soil moisture. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(2), 530–616.
Bai, J., Cui, Q., Zhang, W., & Meng, L. (2019). An approach for downscaling SMAP soil moisture by combining Sentinel-1 SAR and MODIS data. Remote Sensing, 11(23), 2736.
Bai, X., Zhang, L., He, C., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Estimating regional soil moisture distribution based on NDVI and land surface temperature time series data in the upstream of the Heihe River Watershed, Northwest China. Remote Sensing, 12(15), 2414.
Barré, H. M. J. P., Duesmann, B., & Kerr, Y. H. (2008). SMOS: The mission and the system. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(3), 587–593.
Bollero, G. A., Bullock, D. G., & Hollinger, S. E. (1996). Soil temperature and planting date effects on corn yield, leaf area, and plant development. Agronomy Journal, 88(3), 385–390.
Chan, S., Bindlish, R., O’Neill, P., Jackson, T., Chaubell, J., Piepmeier, J., Dunbar, S., Colliander, A., Chen, F., & Entekhabi, D. (2017). Development and validation of the SMAP enhanced passive soil moisture product. 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2539–2542.
Chan, S. K., Bindlish, R., O’Neill, P. E., Njoku, E., Jackson, T., Colliander, A., Chen, F., Burgin, M., Dunbar, S., & Piepmeier, J. (2016). Assessment of the SMAP passive soil moisture product. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(8), 4994–5007.
Colliander, A., Fisher, J. B., Halverson, G., Merlin, O., Misra, S., Bindlish, R., Jackson, T. J., & Yueh, S. (2017). Spatial downscaling of SMAP soil moisture using MODIS land surface temperature and NDVI during SMAPVEX15. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(11), 2107–2111.
Colliander, A., Reichle, R. H., Crow, W. T., Cosh, M. H., Chen, F., Chan, S., Das, N. N., Bindlish, R., Chaubell, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Validation of soil moisture data products from the NASA SMAP mission. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 15, 364–392.
Congalton, R. G., & Green, K. (2019). Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC press.
Dobriyal, P., Qureshi, A., Badola, R., & Hussain, S. A. (2012). A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management. Journal of Hydrology, 458, 110–117.
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., O’neill, P. E., Kellogg, K. H., Crow, W. T., Edelstein, W. N., Entin, J. K., Goodman, S. D., Jackson, T. J., & Johnson, J. (2010). The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(5), 704–716.
Fan, X., Liu, Y., Gan, G., & Wu, G. (2020). SMAP underestimates soil moisture in vegetation-disturbed areas primarily as a result of biased surface temperature data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 247, 111914.
Fang, Y., Xu, L., Chen, Y., Zhou, W., Wong, A., & Clausi, D. A. (2022). A Bayesian deep image prior downscaling approach for high-resolution soil moisture estimation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 15, 4571–4582.
Fang, B., Lakshmi, V., Cosh, M., Liu, P. W., Bindlish, R., & Jackson, T. J. (2022). A global 1‐km downscaled SMAP soil moisture product based on thermal inertia theory. Vadose Zone Journal, 21(2), e20182.
Fathololoumi, S., Vaezi, A. R., Alavipanah, S. K., Ghorbani, A., & Biswas, A. (2020). Comparison of spectral and spatial-based approaches for mapping the local variation of soil moisture in a semi-arid mountainous area. Science of the Total Environment, 724, 138319.
Font, J., Boutin, J., Reul, N., Spurgeon, P., Ballabrera-Poy, J., Chuprin, A., Gabarró, C., Gourrion, J., Guimbard, S., & Hénocq, C. (2013). SMOS first data analysis for sea surface salinity determination. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(9–10), 3654–3670.
Gao, Q., Zribi, M., Escorihuela, M. J., & Baghdadi, N. (2017). Synergetic use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data for soil moisture mapping at 100 m resolution. Sensors, 17(9), 1966.
Ge, L., Hang, R., & Liu, Q. (2019). Retrieving soil moisture over continental us via multi-view multi-task learning. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16(12), 1954–1958.
Greifeneder, F., Notarnicola, C., & Wagner, W. (2021). A machine learning-based approach for surface soil moisture estimations with google earth engine. Remote Sensing, 13(11), 2099.
Guo, P., Zhao, T., Shi, J., Xu, H., Li, X., & Niu, S. (2021). Assessing the active-passive approach at variant incidence angles for microwave brightness temperature downscaling. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(10), 1273–1293.
Han, J., Mao, K., Xu, T., Guo, J., Zuo, Z., & Gao, C. (2018). A soil moisture estimation framework based on the CART algorithm and its application in China. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 65–75.
Han, L., Wang, P., Yang, H., Liu, S., & Wang, J. (2006). Study on NDVI-T s space by combining LAI and evapotranspiration. Science in China Series D, 49, 747–754.
He, L., Hong, Y., Wu, X., Ye, N., Walker, J. P., & Chen, X. (2018). Investigation of SMAP active–passive downscaling algorithms using combined sentinel-1 SAR and SMAP radiometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(8), 4906–4918.
Hoek van Dijke, A. J., Mallick, K., Schlerf, M., Machwitz, M., Herold, M., & Teuling, A. J. (2020). Examining the link between vegetation leaf area and land–atmosphere exchange of water, energy, and carbon fluxes using FLUXNET data. Biogeosciences, 17(17), 4443–4457.
Ines, A. V. M., Das, N. N., Hansen, J. W., & Njoku, E. G. (2013). Assimilation of remotely sensed soil moisture and vegetation with a crop simulation model for maize yield prediction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 138, 149–164.
Jagadish, S. V, Way, D. A., & Sharkey, T. D. (2021). Scaling plant responses to high temperature from cell to ecosystem. Plant, Cell and Environment, 44(BNL-221830-2021-JAAM).
Jamei, M., Mousavi Baygi, M., Asadi Oskouei, E., & Lopez‑Baeza, E. (2020). Validation of the SMOS Level 1C Brightness Temperature and Level 2 Soil Moisture Data over the West and Southwest of Iran. Remote Sensing, 12(17), 2819.
Kim, S.-B., Van Zyl, J. J., Johnson, J. T., Moghaddam, M., Tsang, L., Colliander, A., Dunbar, R. S., Jackson, T. J., Jaruwatanadilok, S., & West, R. (2017). Surface soil moisture retrieval using the L-band synthetic aperture radar onboard the soil moisture active–passive satellite and evaluation at core validation sites. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(4), 1897–1914.
Korres, W., Reichenau, T. G., Fiener, P., Koyama, C. N., Bogena, H. R., Cornelissen, T., Baatz, R., Herbst, M., Diekkrüger, B., & Vereecken, H. (2015). Spatio-temporal soil moisture patterns–A meta-analysis using plot to catchment scale data. Journal of Hydrology, 520, 326–341.
Lazecky, M., Canaslan Comut, F., Qin, Y., & Perissin, D. (2017). Sentinel-1 interferometry system in the high-performance computing environment. The Rise of Big Spatial Data, 131–139.
Lievens, H., Reichle, R. H., Liu, Q., De Lannoy, G. J. M., Dunbar, R. S., Kim, S. B., Das, N. N., Cosh, M., Walker, J. P., & Wagner, W. (2017). Joint Sentinel‐1 and SMAP data assimilation to improve soil moisture estimates. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(12), 6145–6153.
Long, D. G., Brodzik, M. J., & Hardman, M. (2017). Enhanced-resolution SMAP soil moisture using image reconstruction. 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2499–2502.
Millard, K., & Richardson, M. (2018). Quantifying the relative contributions of vegetation and soil moisture conditions to polarimetric C-Band SAR response in a temperate peatland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 206, 123–138.
Ochsner, T. E., Cosh, M. H., Cuenca, R. H., Dorigo, W. A., Draper, C. S., Hagimoto, Y., Kerr, Y. H., Larson, K. M., Njoku, E. G., & Small, E. E. (2013). State of the art in large‐scale soil moisture monitoring. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77(6), 1888–1919.
Park, S., Im, J., Park, S., & Rhee, J. (2015). AMSR2 soil moisture downscaling using multisensor products through machine learning approach. 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 1984–1987.
Paloscia, S., Pettinato, S., Santi, E., Notarnicola, C., Pasolli, L., & Reppucci, A. J. R. S. O. E. (2013). Soil moisture mapping using Sentinel-1 images: Algorithm and preliminary validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 134, 234-248.
Pasolli, L., Notarnicola, C., & Bruzzone, L. (2009). Soil moisture estimation from microwave remote sensing data with nonlinear machine learning techniques. Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XV, 7477, 382–393.
Pede, T., Mountrakis, G., & Shaw, S. B. (2019). Improving corn yield prediction across the US Corn Belt by replacing air temperature with daily MODIS land surface temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 276, 107615.
Peng, J., Loew, A., Merlin, O., & Verhoest, N. E. C. (2017). A review of spatial downscaling of satellite remotely sensed soil moisture. Reviews of Geophysics, 55(2), 341–366.
Piles, M., Sánchez, N., Vall-llossera, M., Camps, A., Martínez-Fernández, J., Martinez, J., & González-Gambau, V. (2014). A downscaling approach for SMOS land observations: Evaluation of high-resolution soil moisture maps over the Iberian Peninsula. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(9), 3845–3857.
Portal, G., Vall-Llossera, M., López-Martínez, C., Camps, A., Pablos, M., Chaparro, D., Irawan, A. M., Alonso-González, A., & Jagdhuber, T. (2023). A Random Forest Approach for Soil Moisture Estimation at 60 Meters Spatial Resolution. IGARSS 2023-2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2898–2901.
Qiu, Y., Fu, B., Wang, J., & Chen, L. (2001). Spatial variability of soil moisture content and its relation to environmental indices in a semi-arid gully catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 49(4), 723–750.
Rahman, A., Maggioni, V., Zhang, X., Houser, P., Sauer, T., & Mocko, D. M. (2022). The joint assimilation of remotely sensed leaf area index and surface soil moisture into a land surface model. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 437.
Reichle, R. H., Ardizzone, J. V, Kim, G.-K., Lucchesi, R. A., Smith, E. B., & Weiss, B. H. (2022). Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission level 4 surface and root zone soil moisture (L4_SM) product specification document.
Reichle, R. H., De Lannoy, G. J. M., Liu, Q., Ardizzone, J. V, Colliander, A., Conaty, A., Crow, W., Jackson, T. J., Jones, L. A., & Kimball, J. S. (2017). Assessment of the SMAP level-4 surface and root-zone soil moisture product using in situ measurements. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18(10), 2621–2645.
Rodriguez-Galiano, V. F., & Chica-Rivas, M. (2014). Evaluation of different machine learning methods for land cover mapping of a Mediterranean area using multi-seasonal Landsat images and Digital Terrain Models. International Journal of Digital Earth, 7(6), 492–509.
Ruiz‐Vera, U. M., Siebers, M. H., Drag, D. W., Ort, D. R., & Bernacchi, C. J. (2015). Canopy warming caused photosynthetic acclimation and reduced seed yield in maize grown at ambient and elevated [CO 2]. Global Change Biology, 21(11), 4237–4249.
Santi, E., Baroni, F., Fontanelli, G., Lapini, A., Paloscia, S., Pettinato, S., Pilia, S., Ramat, G., Santurri, L., & Cigna, F. (2021). Soil moisture mapping at high resolution by merging SMAP, Sentinel1 and COSMO SkyMed with the support of machine learning. Microwave Remote Sensing: Data Processing and Applications, 11861, 1186107.
Senanayake, I. P., Yeo, I.-Y., Walker, J. P., & Willgoose, G. R. (2021). Estimating catchment scale soil moisture at a high spatial resolution: Integrating remote sensing and machine learning. Science of The Total Environment, 776, 145924.
Senyurek, V., Lei, F., Boyd, D., Kurum, M., Gurbuz, A. C., & Moorhead, R. (2020). Machine learning-based CYGNSS soil moisture estimates over ISMN sites in CONUS. Remote Sensing, 12(7), 1168.
Sheng, J., Rao, P., & Ma, H. (2019). Spatial downscaling of the fy3b soil moisture using random forest regression. 2019 8th International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics), 1–6.
Singh, A., Gaurav, K., Sonkar, G. K., & Lee, C.-C. (2023). Strategies to measure soil moisture using traditional methods, automated sensors, remote sensing, and machine learning techniques: review, bibliometric analysis, applications, research findings, and future directions. IEEE Access.
Sotoude Nia, A. (2016). Estimating dry biomass by leaf area index. Water and Irrigation Management, 6(1), 1–13.
Wakigari, S. A., & Leconte, R. (2022). Enhancing Spatial Resolution of SMAP Soil Moisture Products through Spatial Downscaling over a Large Watershed: A Case Study for the Susquehanna River Basin in the Northeastern United States. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 776.
Xing, C., Chen, N., Zhang, X., & Gong, J. (2017). A machine learning based reconstruction method for satellite remote sensing of soil moisture images with in situ observations. Remote Sensing, 9(5), 484.
Yang, J., Li, Z., Zhai, P., Zhao, Y., & Gao, X. (2020). The influence of soil moisture and solar altitude on surface spectral albedo in arid area. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), 35010.
Yazdani, M. R., Asadi Oskouei, E., Rahmani, A., Davatgar, N., & Delsouz Khaki, B. (2023). Analysis of temporal and spatial variations of water requirement for puddling in paddy fields of Sefidrood irrigation network using SMAP satellite soil moisture information. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture.37(3),223-243
Zhong, A., Wang, A., Li, J., Xu, T., Meng, D., Ke, Y., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2018). Downscaling of passive microwave soil moisture retrievals based on spectral analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(1), 50–67.
تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران
دوره 57، شماره 6
شهریور 1405
صفحه 1337-1358