Investigation of Scour Depth Around Pipelines Crossing Rivers Using Artificial Intelligence Methods

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 University of Maragheh

2 Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Malekan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malekan, Iran

Abstract

Local scour around pipelines is one of the main causes of bed instability and damage to fluid conveyance infrastructures, which can lead to serious technical and environmental consequences. In this study, the performance of three artificial intelligence methods, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and QNET, was evaluated for predicting scour depth using 36 experimental datasets. Input parameters included pipe diameter, pipe embedment depth, flow depth, Froude number, and pipe length. The accuracy of the models was assessed using various statistical indices. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), and the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (DC). Results indicated that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) outperformed the other models, achieving the following optimal values for the best architecture in the training and testing phases, respectively: RMSE = 0.0272, R² = 0.9932, DC = 0.9925 and RMSE = 0.1180, R² = 0.8959, DC = 0.8935. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that removing the pipeline-to-bed gap parameter significantly reduced model accuracy and increased prediction error, highlighting the dominant direct influence of this parameter on scour depth. The study concludes that all three AI-based approaches provide high predictive accuracy and can effectively replace conventional empirical models, thereby contributing to risk reduction, cost savings in submarine and river-crossing pipeline projects, and improved management of hydraulic infrastructure.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Scour, as a phenomenon induced by water flow that results in the erosion and removal of riverbed materials around submerged pipelines, can lead to structural instability, damage to infrastructure, and significant economic and environmental losses. Traditional scour prediction methods rely on empirical and hydraulic Methods, which often lack sufficient accuracy under complex flow conditions. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), Methods such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and QNET have been developed for more precise scour depth forecasting. This study is based on experimental data from Ataeian (2011) and aims to compare the performance of these three AI methods in predicting scour depth around pipelines crossing riverbeds. Key parameters investigated include flow velocity, water depth, pipe diameter, pipe clearance from the bed (e/D), and bed material characteristics. Previous research by Chao and Hennessy (1972), Kjeldsen et al. (1973), Bijker and Leeuwestein (1984), Ibrahim and Nalluri (1986), Maza (1987), Chiu (1991), De et al. (2006), Bateni et al. (2007), Choi et al. (2006), Azamatullah et al. (2012), Oliveira et al. (2013), and Khan et al. (2014) highlights the superiority of AI-based approaches over traditional models. Additionally, studies on QNET by Dey (2008, 2010), Kazilos et al. (2011), Rahimi et al. (2015), Heydari et al. (2016), Sharifi et al. (2017), Abbasi and Kazemi (2018), Mattioli et al. (2019), and Ferdesou (2020) emphasize its accuracy across diverse hydraulic conditions.

Method

This study utilized 36 experimental datasets from Ataeian (2011), conducted in the hydraulic laboratory at Urmia University. Experiments were performed in a rectangular flume with transparent Perspex walls, measuring 8 m long, 0.6 m wide, and 0.42 m deep, with a longitudinal slope of 0.0001. The flume featured a uniform sandy bed with a median grain size (d50) of 0.56 mm. Eight pipes (diameters: 2.2–11.6 cm) were tested to evaluate scour depth. Water was supplied from an underground reservoir, regulated via a head tank, and entered the flume through a guiding channel. The test reach, a 1.8-m-long movable bed section (20 cm deep), was located 4 m from the flume inlet. A downstream movable weir (0.6 m wide, 0.36 m high) controlled water levels. Three AI Methods Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and QNET were assessed for scour depth prediction using 11 input combinations (Table 1). These included Froude number (Fr), pipe clearance ratio (), flow depth to pipe diameter ratio (), and bed material size to pipe diameter ratio (). ANN employs multilayer structures for learning nonlinear patterns, SVM excels in classifying complex data, and QNET leverages deep learning for optimized predictions. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (DC). Sensitivity analysis identified influential parameters by recalculating metrics after parameter removal.

Results

The investigation revealed that the first input combination, incorporating maximum scour depth ratio (), pipe clearance ratio (), flow depth to pipe diameter ratio (), Froude number (Fr), and pipe length to diameter ratio (), yielded optimal performance across all three artificial intelligence Methods : Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and QNET. For ANN, the training phase produced a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.0272, a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.9932, and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (DC) of 0.9925, while testing results were 0.1180, 0.8959, and 0.8935, respectively. SVM exhibited training values of 0.0519 (RMSE), 0.9724 (R²), and 0.9814 (DC), with testing values of 0.1819, 0.8322, and 0.8350. QNET recorded training metrics of 0.0611, 0.9081, and 0.9080, and testing metrics of 0.1275, 0.7015, and 0.4924. Analysis of scatter plots indicated strong correlations between predicted and observed data, though slight deviations occurred at extreme values. Sensitivity analysis identified  as the most influential parameter; its exclusion significantly reduced model accuracy and increased errors across all Methods . Comparative evaluation demonstrated that ANN outperformed SVM and QNET, achieving the lowest RMSE and highest R², indicating superior predictive precision. These AI-based approaches offer robust alternatives to conventional empirical Methods, enhancing scour depth prediction accuracy, reducing risks associated with pipeline failures, and supporting optimized design and management of hydraulic infrastructure.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) outperform Support Vector Machines (SVM) and QNET in predicting scour depth around pipelines crossing riverbeds, achieving superior accuracy with lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and higher coefficient of determination (R²). The optimal input combination, incorporating maximum scour depth ratio (), pipe clearance ratio , flow depth to pipe diameter ratio (), Froude number (Fr), and pipe length to diameter ratio (), was identified as the most effective, with e/D being the most critical parameter influencing scour depth. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding   significantly reduced model accuracy, underscoring its pivotal role in scour dynamics. These AI Methods provide robust alternatives to traditional empirical approaches, offering enhanced precision in predicting scour depth, which is vital for mitigating risks of pipeline instability and environmental damage.

However, limitations exist, including minor discrepancies in predicting extreme scour values and reliance on controlled laboratory data from Ataeian (2011). Complex real-world flow regimes, such as turbulent or unsteady conditions, may challenge model generalizability. The practical implications include improved design and maintenance of hydraulic infrastructure, reducing economic and environmental risks associated with scour-induced failures. Theoretically, this work advances the application of AI in hydraulic engineering, highlighting the efficacy of ANN in capturing nonlinear scour patterns. Future research should incorporate diverse real-world datasets and explore complex flow conditions to enhance model robustness and applicability, ultimately supporting sustainable water infrastructure management.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Contributions

Mahdi Majedi Asl: Writing - original draft preparation

Arash Faraji: Resources, Software, Manuscript editing

Tohid Omidpour Alavian: Formal analysis and investigation

Mahdi Majedi Asl, Arash Faraji: Visualization, Supervision

Tohid Omidpour Alavian: Conceptualization, methodology

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

Statement: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [ChatGpt] in order to [Text Editing]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

This declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools for checking grammar, spelling, references, etc. If there is nothing to disclose, there is no need to add a statement.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere thanks and appreciation to the esteemed staff University of Maragheh.

Ethical Considerations

This study did not involve human participants or animals and therefore did not require ethical approval. The authors confirm that all ethical standards of research, including avoidance of data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, were fully observed.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Abbasi, M., & Kazemi, F. (2018). Limitations and adjustments of QNET in complex flow scenarios. Applied Ocean Research, 75, 76–82.
Atayeian, A. (2011). Estimation of local scour depth beneath a pipeline crossing a river [Master’s thesis, University of Urmia, Faculty of Agriculture, Iran]. (In persian)
Azamatullah, M. N., Deo, M. C., & Yadav, R. N. (2012). Prediction of pipeline scour using neural networks. Marine Structures, 25(1), 34–53.
Bateni, S. M., Borghei, S. M., & Jeng, D. S. (2007). Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers. Advances in Engineering Software, 38(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2006.06.012
Bijker, E. W., & Leeuwestein, W. (1984). Interaction between pipelines and the seabed under the influence of waves and currents. Proceedings of the Conference on Behavior of Offshore Structures, 3, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4958-4_28
Chao, J. L., & Hennessy, P. V. (1972). Local Scour under Ocean Outfall Pipelines. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), 44(7), 1443–1447. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25037552
Chiew, Y. M. (1991). Prediction of maximum scour depth at submarine pipelines. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(4), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733429(1991)117:4(452)
Choi, S. U., & Jung, S. (2006). Prediction of local scour around bridge piers using artificial neural networks. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(2), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb03852.x
De, D., Roy, S., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2006). Predicting scour depth using neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(2).
Dey, X. (2010). Comparative analysis of scour prediction methods: The QNET approach. International Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52(1), 120–130.
Dey, X., Zhao, Y., & Lu, Q. (2008). Mechanics of steady-state scour: a comparative study using QNET models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(11), 1608–1616.
Ferdesou, T. (2020). QNET model enhancement for pipeline-riverbed interaction analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(11), 890.
Habib, M. A., Abolfathi, S., O’Sullivan, John. J., & Salauddin, M. (2024). Efficient data-driven machine learning models for scour depth predictions at sloping sea defences. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10, 1343398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1343398  . (In persian)
Hassan, W. H., & Jalal, H. K. (2021). Prediction of the depth of local scouring at a bridge pier using a gene expression programming method. SN Applied Sciences, 3(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04124-9. (In persian)
Haykin, S. (1999). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall.
Heydari, S., et al. (2016). Scour prediction under storm conditions using QNET: A tool for natural disaster management. Natural Hazards Review, 17(2), 04016006.
Hu, K., Bai, X., Zhang, Z., & Vaz, M. A. (2021). Prediction of submarine pipeline equilibrium scour depth based on machine learning applications considering the flow incident angle. Applied Ocean Research, 112, 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102717
Hu, R., Wang, X., Liu, H., Leng, H., & Lu, Y. (2022). Scour Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Depth Prediction around a Submarine Piggyback Pipeline. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(3), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10030350
Ibrahim, A., & Nalluri, C. (1986). Scour prediction around marine pipelines. In International offshore mechanics and arctic engineering. Symposium. 5 (pp. 679–684).
Kazilos, P., et al. (2011). Utilization of QNET for enhanced scour prediction around submarine pipelines. Marine Structures, 24(3), 318–329.
Khan, Z., Nanda, S., & Goel, A. (2014). Prediction of scour depth around submerged pipelines using artificial neural networks. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 5(1), 04013009.
Kjeldsen, S. P., Einstein, H. H., & Christensen, B. A. (1973). Local scour near offshore pipelines. In Paper available only as part of the complete Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions (POAC), August 27-30, 1973.
Marulasiddappa, S. B., Patil, A. P., Kuntoji, G., et al. (2024). Prediction of scour depth around bridge abutments using ensemble machine learning models. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09109-4
Mattioli, P., et al. (2019). Bed dynamics and QNET modeling accuracy in close-bed interactions. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 145(5), 04019012.
Maza, J. A. (1987). Introduction to river engineering. Advanced Course on Water Resources Management, Universita Italiana per Stranieri.
Nandi, B., & Das, S. (2025). Prediction of maximum scour depth at clear water conditions: Multivariate analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 354, 120349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120349
Oliveira, A., Melo, M. S., & Tormena, J. M. (2013). Application of artificial neural networks for scour prediction at submerged pipeline crossings. Applied Ocean Research, 40, 75–82.
Parsaie, A., Haghiabi, A. H., & Moradinejad, A. (2019). Prediction of Scour Depth below River Pipeline using Support Vector Machine. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, ۲۳(۶), ۲۵۶۲–۲۵۷۱. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1327-0
Qnet v2000 (Trial Version). (2000). Developed by Vesta Services, Inc., Winnetka, IL, USA. Archival information and download links available at: https://qnet-2000.software.informer.com/ and https://qnetv2kt.software.informer.com
Rahimi, A., et al. (2015). Application of QNET for turbulent flow conditions: Environmental and structural impact analysis. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 141(8), 04015019.
Rahman, F., & Chavan, R. (2025). Machine Learning Application in Prediction of Scour Around Bridge Piers: A Comprehensive Review. Archive of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32, 1299–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10167-7
Sharifi, M., et al. (2017). Evaluating QNET for scour depth prediction across varied flow and substrate conditions. Journal of Coastal Research, 34(1), 1–10.
Soltani Sotobadi, M., Omidpour Alavian, T., & Kardan, N. (2025). Forecasting the Local Scour Depth around Cylindrical Bridge Foundations on Cohesive Soil Utilizing Meta Models. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 19(2), 275–290. (In persian)
Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0
Xiu, Z., Luo, C., Liu, L., Du, X., Gao, W., Song, Y., Shi, B., & Chi, W. (2025). CFD and machine learning approach based-predictive modeling of scouring below submarine pipeline under wave and current condition. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 43(9), 1779-1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2024.2434954