تعیین حدود بهینه مقدار و شوری آب آبیاری در کشت کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa) با روش سطح-پاسخ

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده آب و خاک، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران

3 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa) یکی از گیاهان زراعی برای تأمین امنیت غذایی در جهان معرفی شده است که شرایط تنش آبی و خشکی را تا حدودی میتواند تحمل کند. لیکن، توسعه کشت آن در شرایط تنش آبی و خشکی در استان خوزستان میبایست براساس تعیین حدود مقادیر آب آبیاری و تعیین  آستانه تحمل به شوری باشد. برای دستیابی به این هدف، پژوهش حاضر در یک مزرعه تحقیقاتی واقع در شهرستان باغملک، در شرق استان خوزستان، در طول جغرافیایی ۴۹ درجه و 51 دقیقه شرقی و عرض جغرافیایی ۳۱ درجه و 41 دقیقه‌ی شمالی در سال زراعی 1402-1401 انجام شد. در این پژوهش، گیاه کینوا تحت آبیاری قطرهای و به صورت پالسی کشت گردید. کفایت آبیاری 60 تا 100 درصدی نیاز آبی (کدهای 1- تا 1+) در کرتهای مختلف انجام شد. تیمارهای شوری آب در دو سطح 5/0 و 0/6 دسیزیمنس بر متر اعمال گردید. بدین صورت که در شرایط عدم تنش شوری (مقدار 1+)، آبیاری پالسی با سه پالس آب شیرین انجام شد.اما در شرایط تنش کامل شوری (کد 1-)، آبیاری پالسی در سه پالس آب شور صورت گرفت. برای تعیین حدود بهینه این پارامترها، از روش سطح-پاسخ استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان داد که در بهینهترین حالت (تیمار 60 درصد آبیاری و پالس آبیاری بهصورت آب شیرین-آب شور-آب شیرین)، وزن خشک و تر علوفه به ترتیب برابر با 7/6845 و 9/24827 کیلوگرم در هکتار به دست آمد. همچنین فیبر و قند محلول علوفه به ترتیب به 0/15 و 4/10 درصد رسیدند. لازم به ذکر است، مقادیر بهینه آب آبیاری برابر با 60 درصد نیاز آبی و مقدار بهینه کد روش پالسی برابر با صفر به دست آمد. لذا پیشنهاد می شود برای رسیدن به پارامترهای بهینه کمی و کیفی علوفهی کینوا، روش آبیاری پالسی به صورت آب شیرین-آب شور-آب شیرین و با تأمین 60 درصد نیاز آبی گیاه کینوا انجام شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining the Optimal Irrigation Amount and Salinity in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) by Surface-Response Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • jalal gharibvan notorki 1
  • halimeh piri 1
  • parviz haghighatjoo 1
  • amir naserin 2
  • mahdi asadi loor 3
1 phd student, Department of Water Engineering, College of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 Department of Water Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz – Iran
3 Department of Water Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) has been introduced as one of the crops to ensure food security in the world, which can tolerate water and drought stress. However, the cultivation development of quinoa under water and salinity stress in Khuzestan province, Iran, should be based on determining the limits of irrigation water and determining its tolerance to salinity. To achieve this goal, the present research was conducted in a research farm located in Baghmalek city, in the east of Khuzestan province, Iran, at the latitude of 31° 41’ N and longitude of 49° 51’ E during 2022-2023. In this research, the quinoa was grown under pulse drip irrigation. Irrigation water was supplied between 60% and 100% of the water requirement (code -1 to +1) in different plots. Applying salinity treatment with two water sources with salinities of 0.5 and 0.6 dS.m-1. Thus, in the absence of salinity stress (code +1), pulse irrigation was done with three fresh water pulses. In the conditions of full salinity stress (code -1), pulse irrigation was done with three pulses of saline water. Response-surface method was used to determine the optimal amounts of these parameters. The results showed that in the optimal state (Treatment of 60% irrigation and pulse irrigation in the form of fresh water-salt water-fresh water), the dry weight of fodder was equal to 6845.7 and the wet weight of fodder was equal to 24827.9 kg.ha-1. In addition, the percentage of fiber and soluble sugars of fodder reached 0.15 and 10.4%, respectively. It is worth mentioning, the optimal amount of irrigation water was equal to 60% of the water requirement and the pulse method code was equal to zero. Therefore, it is suggested to reach the optimal quantitative and qualitative parameters of quinoa fodder, the pulse irrigation method is done in the form of fresh water-salt water-fresh water and by providing 60% of the water requirement of the quinoa.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pulse Irrigation
  • Fiber Percentage
  • Deficit Irrigation
  • Quinoa Quality

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

 Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa L.) has been introduced as one of the crops to ensure food security in the world, which can tolerate water and drought stress to some extent. However, the development of its cultivation in the conditions of water stress and drought in Khuzestan province should be based on determining the limits of irrigation water and determining the threshold of tolerance to salinity. There are many methods to optimize the parameters in agriculture and each one is used for specific purposes due to having weak points and strengths. The use of small data that can be collected in the field is one of the basic factors for choosing the optimization method in agriculture. The response surface method is known as one of the modern optimization methods and its application in the agricultural sector is expanding day by day.

Materials and Methods

To achieve this goal, the present research was conducted in a research farm located in Baghmalek city, in the east of Khuzestan province, at the longitude of 49 degrees and 51 minutes east and latitude of 31 degrees and 41 minutes north in the crop year of 2022-2023. In this research, the quinoa plant was grown under drip irrigation and pulsed. Irrigation adequacy of 60 to 100 percent of water requirement (codes -1 to +1) was done in different plots. Water salinity treatments were applied at two levels of 0.5 and 0.6 deci-siemens/meter. Thus, in the condition of no salinity stress (code +1), pulse irrigation was done with three pulses of fresh water. But in the condition of complete salinity stress (code -1), pulse irrigation was done in three pulses of salt water. Level-response method was used to determine the optimal limits of these parameters.

Results and Discussion

By increasing the quantitative characteristics of the root, the dry and wet weight of the fodder also increases. On the other hand, this trend is not seen for qualitative parameters because no direct trend was seen between the increase of qualitative and quantitative parameters. The optimal level of irrigation water quantity and salinity is displayed in white. In fact, if the amount of irrigation water is between -0.3 and +0.5 and the salinity stress is considered between -1 and zero; The best mode is obtained to achieve optimal values. Of course, this range may not simultaneously increase the value of all quantitative and qualitative parameters. Based on the obtained results, the dry weight of fodder decreased to 6845.7 kg/hectare in the optimal condition. This amount is about 43% less than the maximum amount of fodder harvested in the field and equal to the average weight of dry fodder obtained in this research. The fresh weight of fodder also decreased to 24827.9 kg per hectare compared to the target value. This value is close to the average yield of fodder obtained in the research. However, the amount of fiber reached 15.9%. The percentage of fiber obtained in the research farm was between 14-19%, and the optimal percentage of fiber was about 5% less than the average percentage of fiber. The amount of soluble sugars in fodder reached 10.4%, which was about 4% more than the target amount. The dry and wet weight of the roots were calculated as 0.45 and 94.9 grams, respectively, which were 55 and 61% lower than the target values, respectively. The optimal amount of irrigation water was equal to 60% of the water requirement and the pulse method code was equal to zero. In fact, if the pulse irrigation method is done in the form of fresh water-salt water-fresh water and by providing 60% of the water requirement of the quinoa plant; Optimal values ​​will be obtained.

Author Contributions

J.Gh. conducted the experiment, measurements, analyses and drafted the frst manuscript. H.P wrote the original draft and editing. Other colleagues collaborated on the research as consultants. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers and editor for their critical comments that helped to improve the paper.The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and facilities provided by the Department of Water Engineering, College of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.This work was supported by University of Zabol [grant number: UOZ-GR-1837].

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ahmadee, M., Khashei-Siuki, A., & Sayyari Zahan, M. H. (2016). Comparison of Efficiency of Different Equations to Estimate the Water Requirement in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.( (Case Study: Birjand Plain, Iran). Journal of Agroecology8(4), 505-520. (in Persian)
Ahmadi, S. H., & Ardekani, J. N. (2006). The effect of water salinity on growth and physiological stages of eight Canola (Brassica napus) cultivars. Irrigation Science25, 11-20.
Aslan, N. E. V. Z. A. T. (2008). Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design for modeling and optimization of a multi-gravity separator for chromite concentration. Powder Technology185(1), 80-86.
Box, G.E. and Hunter, J.S., 1957. Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pp.195-241.
Box, G. E. P. and Wilson, K. B. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions.  Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology). 13: 1–45. 
Chinnusamy, V., Jagendorf, A., & Zhu, J. K. (2005). Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop science45(2), 437-448.
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. T., & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical chemistry28(3), 350-356.
Elewa, T. A., Sadak, M. S., & Saad, A. M. (2017). Proline treatment improves physiological responses in quinoa plants under drought stress. Bioscience Research14(1), 21-33.
FAO. 2014. Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome.
Goodarzi, F., Delshad, M., Mansouri, H., & Soltani, F. (2021). Optimization of nitrogen fertilizer and plant spacing on the row parameters in ‎spinach cv. “Harrier” using response surface methodology. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science52(1), 139-151. (in Persian)
Hamid, Z., Soltani Mohammadi, A., & Ahmadee, M. (2022). Evaluation of Full Factorial, Taguchi and Central Composite Design Methods in Reducing Nitrate Leaching from Soil under Zeolite Treatment. Irrigation and Water Engineering13(1), 90-107. (in Persian)
Hanway, J. J., Ritchie, S. W. 2019. Zea mays, CRC Handbook of Flowering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 525–541, 2019.
Jahan, M., Nasiri mahalati, M., Khalilzadeh, H., Bigonah, R., & Razavi, S. A. R. (2015). Optimizing of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Cattle Manure Fertilizers Application in Winter Wheat Production Using Response-Surface Methodology (RSM). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research13(4), 823-839. (in Persian)
Jahan, M., Amiri, M. B., & Nourbakhsh, F. (2016). Evaluation of the Increased Rates of Water Super Absorbent and Humic Acid Application under Deficit Irrigation Condition on Some Agroecological Characteristics of Zea Mays Using Response Surface Methodology. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research14(4), 746-764. (in Persian)
Kalavathy, H.M., Regupathib, I., Pillai, M.G., & Miranda, L.R., (2009). Modelling, analysis and optimization of adsorption parameters for H 3 PO 4 activated rubber wood sawdust using response surface methodology (RSM). Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 70: 35–45.
KhasheiSiuki, A., Hashemi, S. R., & Ahmadee, M. (2017). Application of the Taguchi approach in the evaluation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) emergence affected by Zeolite and irrigation scheduling. Journal of Saffron Research4(2), 266-278. (in Persian)
Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., Moradi, R., and Mansouri, H., 2014. Optimizing water, nitrogen, and crop density in canola cultivation using response surface methodology and central composite design. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 1: 1-13.
Kumar, V., Shiram, V., Jawali, N., and Shitole, M.G. 2007. Differential response of indica rice genotypes to NaCl stress in relation to physiological and biochemical parameters. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2:581-592.
Kwak, J. S. 2005. Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 45: 327–34.
Li, Y., Li, Z., Cui, S., Chang, S., Jia, Ch., and Zhang, Q. 2019. A global synthesis of the effect of water and nitrogen input on maize (Zea mays) yield, water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 268: 136-145.
Mansouri, H., Bannayan, M., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Lakzian, A., 2015. Management of nitrogen, irrigation, and planting density in Persian shallot (Allium hirtifolium) by using central composite optimizing method. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 24(4): 41-60.  
Mansouri, H., Banyan, M., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Lakzian, A.  2014.  Management of nitrogen fertilizer, irrigation, and plant density in onion production using response surface methodology as optimization approach. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 9(7): 676-687.
Mansouri, H., Noshad, H., & Hassani, M. (2021). Optimization of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Consumption in Sugar Beet by using Response-Surface Method. Journal of Agroecology13(1), 57-72. (in Persian)
Masri, M.I., Ramadan, B.S.B., El-Shafai, A.M.A., and El-Kady, M.S., 2015. Effect of water stress and fertilization on yield and  quality  of  sugar beet  under  drip  and sprinkler  irrigation  systems  in sandy  soil.  International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 5(3): 414-425.
Mazumdar, D., Saha, Sh. P., Ghosh, Sh. 2021. RSM based optimization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and nitrogen dosage for enhanced growth and yield of mustard (Brassica campestris L.), Pant Nutrition, 44 (15): 2228-2244.
Mokhtaran, A., tavoosi, M., Varjavand, P., & Sepehri Sadeghian, S. (2020). Investigation of the Eeffects of Sugarcane Drainage Water for Quinoa Cultivation in Southern Khuzestanon on Crop Yield and Soil Salinity and Sodictiy Changes. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture34(3), 337-354. (in Persian)
Montgomery, D.C. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments, fifth ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York. 734 p.
Namihira, T, Shinzato, N., Akamine, H, Nakamura, I, Maekawa, H, Kawamoto, and Y.  Matsui, T.  2011. The effect of nitrogen fertilization to the sward on guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq cv. Gatton) silage fermentation. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science. 24: 358-363.
Piri, H., & Naserin, A. (2022). Comparison of different irrigation methods for onion by means of water and nitrogen response functions. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology97(1), 122-136.
Rajabzadeh, F., & pazira, E. (2022). Management of drainage waters from sugarcane cultivation in Khuzestan plain. Water Management in Agriculture9(1), 119-134. (in Persian)
Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Khorramdel, S., Latifi, H., Farzaneh Belgerdi, M. R., & Davarpanah, S. J. (2021). Optimization of Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels on Yield, Water Use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) by Using the Surface-Response Methodology. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research19(2), 185-199. (in Persian)
Subbaro, G., Nam, N.H., chauhan, Y.S. and johansen, C., 2000. Oosmotic adjustment, water relation and carbohydrate remobilization in pigeonpea under water deficits. Journal of plant physiology, 157: 651- 659.
Tourajzadeh, O., Piri, H., Naserin, A., & Chari, M. M. (2024). Investigation of the Effect of Biochar on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil under Quinoa Cultivation under Water and Salinity Stress Conditions. Water & Soil38(1). (in Persian)
Tourajzadeh, O., Piri, H., Naserin, A., & Cahri, M. M. (2024). Effect of nano biochar addition and deficit irrigation on growth, physiology and water productivity of quinoa plants under salinity conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 217, 105564.
Van Soest, P. J., B. Robertson, & B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition Journal of Dairy Science. 74: 3583-3597.
Wu, C.F.J., & Hamada, M. 2009. Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. Second edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 853p.
Yaghoub Zadeh, M., Ahmadi, M., Boroomandnasab, S., & Haghayeghimoghaddam, S. A., (2016). Impact of Climate Change on Changing Trend of Evapotranspiration during the Growth Period of Irrigated and Rainfed Field Crops by AOGCM Models. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture30(4), 511-523. (in Persian)
Yaghoub Zadeh, M., Ahmadi, M., Seyed Kaboli, H., Zamani, G. R., & Amir Abadi Zadeh, M. (2017). The evaluation of Effect of Climate Change on Agricultural Drought Using ETDI and SPI Indexes. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation24(4), 43-61. (in Persian)
Zulkali, M. M. D., Ahmad, A. L., and Norulakmal, N. H. 2006.  Oryza sativa L husk as heavy metal adsorbent: optimization with lead as model solution. Bioresource Technology. 97: 21-25.