کنترل پرش هیدرولیکی نامتقارن در کانال‌های با مقطع واگرای ناگهانی توسط سیستم جت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده مهندسی آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 دانشکده مهندسی آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه سازه‌های آبی، دانشکده علوم آب، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

10.22059/ijswr.2024.377718.669725

چکیده

قرارگیری سیستم جت در تقابل و تقاطع با جریان آب پایین آمده از سرریز اوجی پس از مقطع واگرای ناگهانی، پرش نامتقارن را کنترل کرده و موجب یکنواختی جریان آب در طول کانال می‌شود. در این تحقیق از 3 ترکیب‌بندی سیستم جت با هدف بکارگیری حداقلی و3 قطر جت استفاده شد و شرایط جریان پایین‌دست کانال در دو پرش S و T و فرودهای مختلف بررسی گردید. با وجود سیستم جت، پارامتر  β_L معرفی شده برای پرش‌ S، پراکندگی و مقدار کمتری نسبت به پرش‌ T دارد. به عبارت دیگر، سیستم جت به عنوان یک سازه کاهنده انرژی و جریان یکنواخت در شرایط بحرانی‌تر بسیار خوب عمل کرده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد که پارامتر مومنتم β_L.v_m^2 از محل انبساط ناگهانی (تلاطم زیاد) به سمت انتهای کانال کم شده است که در واقع، نیروی مومنتم بر روی بستر کاهش می‌یابد. ترکیب‌بندی با تعداد جت حداقل، بیشترین یکنواختی جریان را به همراه داشته و قطر جت وابسته به نوع پرش ( تغییر عمق پایاب) می‌باشد. طول پرش با استفاده از سیستم جت به طور قابل توجهی نسبت به مدل شاهد کاهش یافته ولی به افت نسبی انرژی افزوده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که استفاده از سیستم جت‌های جانبی و متقابل در همه مدل‌های آزمایش شده، می‌تواند به طور قابل توجهی پرش هیدرولیکی را کنترل کرده و موجب توزیع یکنواخت سرعت در پایین‌دست کانال گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Asymmetric hydraulic jump control in sudden expansion channels using a Jet system

نویسندگان [English]

  • afshin mahjoubi 1
  • Javad Ahadiyan 2
  • Seyed Mohsen Sajjadi 3
  • Seyed Mahmood Kashefipour 1
1 1. Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. Center of Excellence of the Network Improvement and Maintenance, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. Center of Excellence of the Network Improvement and Maintenance, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. Center of Excellence of the Network Improvement and Maintenance, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

The implementation of a jet system at the intersection of the downstream flow from the ogee weir, following the sudden expansion section, effectively controls the asymmetric jump and promotes uniform flow distribution along the channel. This study employed three jet system configurations, each utilizing a minimum number of jets with varying diameters, to investigate the downstream flow conditions under different S and T jumps and tailwater depths. With the introduction of the jet system, the dispersion and magnitude of the parameter (βL) introduced for the S jump exhibited reduced values compared to the T jump. In essence, the jet system functioned admirably as an energy-dissipating and flow-uniforming structure under more critical conditions. The findings revealed a decreasing trend in the momentum parameter (βL.vm2) from the location of sudden expansion (high turbulence) towards the channel end, indicating a reduction in the momentum force acting on the bed. The configuration with the minimum number of jets achieved the most uniform flow distribution, while the jet diameter was found to be dependent on the type of jump (tailwater depth variation). The jump length was significantly reduced compared to the control model with the implementation of the jet system, albeit at the cost of a slight energy loss. The results demonstrate that the utilization of side-facing and opposing jet systems effectively controls the hydraulic jump and promotes uniform velocity distribution in the downstream channel for all tested configurations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cross and counterflow jets
  • Asymmetric hydraulic jumps
  • S and T-jumps
  • Dissipating energy structures
  • Sudden expansion

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

 

Introduction

The presence of a sudden expansion in open channels often leads to the formation of asymmetric hydraulic jumps. These jumps, while associated with turbulence, energy dissipation, and air entrainment, can be problematic due to their extended domain range. This can cause significant bed erosion, damage to structures, and endanger aquatic life. The cross-flow and counterflow jet system implemented in this research, positioned downstream of the sudden expansion section, aims to reduce pressure fluctuations and turbulence along the channel, promoting flow uniformity.

Material and Methods

The investigation focused on the influence of jet configurations (including the optimal case), jet diameter variations, different tailwater depths, and various Froude numbers on the downstream flow hydrodynamics. Interestingly, even with the active jet injection system, the βL parameter exhibited lower dispersion and values for S-jumps compared to T-jumps. This suggests that the cross-flow and counterflow jet system performed particularly well as a dissipation structure, achieving more uniform flow under these critical conditions. The findings also revealed a significant decrease in the momentum parameter βL.vm2 as flow progressed from the sudden expansion towards the canal end. This translates to a reduction in the momentum force acting on the channel bed. However, during the initial stages of wave formation (first or second cycles) observed in the witness model (without any flow control structure), the βL.vm2 parameter reached its peak alongside the maximum βL value. Overall, the results demonstrate that the cross-flow and counterflow jet system effectively controls asymmetric hydraulic jumps and promotes uniform velocity distribution throughout the downstream canal section in all tested configurations.

Results and Discussion

A comprehensive review of existing literature revealed a gap in research regarding the application of combined lateral cross-flow and counterflow jets for controlling asymmetric hydraulic jumps. This is particularly true for T-jumps, where existing studies are scarce, and the use of jet systems for their control has not been documented. Motivated by this gap, the present research aims to investigate the effectiveness of the cross-flow and counterflow jet system in controlling both S-type and T-type asymmetric hydraulic jumps. The underlying assumption is that this system will effectively dissipate the jump's energy and promote uniform flow conditions downstream. By extending the investigation to T-jumps, this study contributes valuable insights to a less explored area within the field of hydraulic jump control.

Asymmetric jumps inherently induce flow turbulence and generate long-wavelength waves with high localized velocities. S-type jumps exhibit longer wavelengths, while T-jumps may experience shorter wavelengths but significantly higher non-uniformity. Regardless of type, controlling asymmetric jumps is crucial in real-world scenarios to prevent severe damage to the downstream channel, whether prismatic or non-prismatic.

The configuration with the minimum number of jets achieved the most uniform flow distribution, while the jet diameter was found to be dependent on the type of jump (tailwater depth variation). The jump length was significantly reduced compared to the control model with the implementation of the jet system, albeit at the cost of a slight energy loss.

Conclusion

The cross-flow and counterflow jet injection system employed in this research acts as a barrier to the main flow, promoting the dispersion and uniformity of the velocity distribution downstream. This effectively eliminates waves and return flows. In the witness model (without jet injection), the return flow velocity for the S-jump was approximately twice that of the forward flow, while the T-jump experienced a return flow velocity four times stronger than the forward flow.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.

 

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

 

Alghwail, Svetlana, & Abourohiem, M. A. (2018). Dissipation of mechanical energy over spillway through counter flow. Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers, 70(05), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1691.2016
Alhamid, A. A. (2004). S-jump characteristics on sloping basins. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42(6), 657–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2004.9628319
Arabi, A., Salhi, Y., Zenati, Y., Si-Ahmed, E.-K., & Legrand, J. (2021). Experimental investigation of sudden expansion’s influence on the hydrodynamic behavior of different sub-regimes of intermittent flow. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 205, 10883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108834
Blevins, R. D. (1984). Applied fluid dynamics handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. http://books.google.com/books?id=G-ZUAAAAMAAJ
Bremen, R. (1990). Expanding stilling basin. Laboratoire De Constructions Hydrauliques. Lausanne, 1990
Bremen, R., & Hager, W. H. (1993). T-jump in abruptly expanding channel. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 31(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689309498860
Bremen, R., & Hager, W. H. (1994). Expanding stilling basin. (Includes appendices). Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water, Maritime and Energy, 106(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1680/iwtme.1994.26934
Chen, J. G., Zhang, J. M., Xu, W. L., & Peng, Y. (2014). Characteristics of the Velocity Distribution in a Hydraulic Jump Stilling Basin with Five Parallel Offset Jets in a Twin-Layer Configuration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000817
Chow VT, 1959. Open Channel Hydraulics. Mc Grow Hill Book Co, New York, NY.
Daneshfaraz, R., Majedi Asl, M., & Mirzaeereza, R. (2019). Experimental Study of Expanding Effect and Sand-Roughened Bed on Hydraulic Jump Characteristics. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 50(4), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2018.261923.667968.
Hydraulic Engineering-Asce - J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, 128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:7(656)
Ferreri, G. B., & Nasello, C. (2002). Hydraulic jumps at drop and abrupt enlargement in rectangular channel. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 40(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680209499891
France, P. W. (1981). AN INVESTIGATION OF A JET-ASSISTED HYDRAULIC JUMP. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 19(4), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688109499507
Graber, S. D. (2006). Asymmetric Flow in Symmetric Supercritical Expansions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:2(207)
HAGER, W. H. (1992). Energy Dissipators and Hydraulic Jump. Springer Science & Business Media.
Haghdoost, M., Sajjadi, S., Fathi Moghadam, M., & Ahadiyan, J. (2022). Experimental study of spatial hydraulic jump stabilization using lateral jet flow. Water Supply, 22(11), 8337–8352. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.376
Hajialigol, S., Ahadiyan, J., Sajjadi, M., Rita Scorzini, A., Di Bacco, M., & Shafai Bejestan, M. (2021). Cross-Beam Dissipators in Abruptly Expanding Channels: Experimental Analysis of Flow Patterns. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 147(11), 06021012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001622
Hajialigol, S., Ahadiyan, J., Sajjadi, S. M., Hazi, M. A., Chadee, A. A., Nadian, H. A., & Kirby, J. (2024). Experimental analysis of turbulence measurements in a new dissipator structural (cross beams) in abruptly expanding channels. Results in Engineering, 21, 101829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101829
Herbrand, K. (1973a). The Spatial Hydraulic Jump. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 11(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687309499774
Herbrand, K. (1973b). The Spatial Hydraulic Jump. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 11(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687309499774
Ibrahim, M. M., Refaie, M. A., & Ibraheem, A. M. (2022). Flow characteristics downstream stepped back weir with bed water jets. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(2), 101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.08.003
Jobson, H. (1965). The effect of submerged jets on the hydraulic jump. Masters Theses. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/5687
Kordi, E., & Abustan, I. (2012). Transitional Expanding Hydraulic Jump. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000479
Matin, M. A., Hasan, M. M. R., & Islam, M. A. (2008a). Experiment on hydraulic jump in sudden expansion in a sloping rectangular channel. Journal of Civil Engineering.
Matin, M. A., Hasan, M. M. R., & Islam, M. A. (2008b). Experiment on hydraulic jump in sudden expansion in a sloping rectangular channel. Journal of Civil Engineering.
Mero, S., & Mitchell, S. (2017). Investigation of energy dissipation and flow regime over various forms of stepped spillways. Water and Environment Journal, 31(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12224
Mossa, M., Petrillo, A., & Chanson, H. (2005). Tailwater level effects on flow conditions at an abrupt drop.
Neisi, K., & Bejestan, M. S. (2013). Characteristics of S-jump on Roughened Bed Stilling Basin. Journal of Water Sciences Research, ISSN: 2251-7405 eISSN: 2251-7413 Vol.5, No.2, Summer 2013, 25-34, JWSR.
Ohtsu, I., Yasuda, Y., & Ishikawa, M. (1999). Submerged Hydraulic Jumps below Abrupt Expansions. Journal Of Hydraulic Engineering. 1999.125:492-499.
Omid, M. H., Esmaeeli Varaki, M., & Narayanan, R. (2007). Gradually expanding hydraulic jump in a trapezoidal channel. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 45(4), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521786
Rajaratnam, N. (1967). Hydraulic Jumps. In Advances in Hydroscience (Vol. 4, pp. 197–280). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4831-9935-1.50011-2
Sajjadi, S. M., Kazemi, M., Pari, S. A. A., & Kashefipour, S. M. (2023). Effect of Submerged Counter Flow Jet on Hydraulic Jump Characteristics in Stilling Basins. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47(2), 1153–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00933-7
Scorzini, A. R., Di Bacco, M., & Leopardi, M. (2016). Experimental Investigation on a System of Crossbeams As Energy Dissipator in Abruptly Expanding Channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 142(2), 06015018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001088
Sharoonizadeh, S., Ahadiyan, J., Scorzini, A. R., Di Bacco, M., Sajjadi, M., & Moghadam, M. F. (2021). Experimental Analysis on the Use of Counterflow Jets as a System for the Stabilization of the Spatial Hydraulic Jump. Water, 13(18), 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182572
Sharoonizadeh, S., Ahadiyan, J., Scorzini, A. R., Di Bacco, M., Sajjadi, M., & Moghadam, M. F. (2022). Turbulence characteristics of the flow resulting from the hydrodynamic interaction of multiple counter flow jets in expanding channels. Acta Mechanica, 233(9), 3867–3880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-022-03250-2
Tharp, E. L. (1966). Modification of the hydraulic jump by submerged jets. Rolla, Missori.
Torkamanzad, N., Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A., Salmasi, F., & Abbaspour, A. (2019). Hydraulic Jump below Abrupt Asymmetric Expanding Stilling Basin on Rough Bed. Water, 11(9), 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091756
Varol, F. A. (2009). The Effect Of Water Jet On The Hydraulic Jump. Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC 13 2009, Hurghada, Egypt
Yüksel, Y., Günal, M., Bostan, T., Çevik, E., & Çelikoğlu, Y. (2004). The influence of impinging jets on hydraulic jumps. Water Management.