Optimizing Water Productivity in the Face of Climate Change: The Central Role of Machine Learning Approaches

Document Type : Review

Authors

1 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural

2 Department of reclamation of arid and mountainous regions Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

3 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj.

10.22059/ijswr.2025.403943.670022

Abstract

Climate change, by inducing severe fluctuations in precipitation patterns, temperature, and evapotranspiration, has increasingly challenged water resource management, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Under these critical conditions, enhancing water use efficiency (WUE) in agriculture is recognized as one of the most effective strategies for adapting to water scarcity and ensuring food security. However, assessing and optimizing WUE exceeds the capabilities of traditional models due to the nonlinear and dynamic relationships among climatic, soil, and crop variables. Recent advances in data science and artificial intelligence—particularly the development of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models—have enabled the analysis of vast volumes of climatic, hydrological, and agricultural data. This comprehensive review explores the role of data-driven approaches in optimizing water use efficiency under climatic uncertainty. By reviewing existing studies, we analyze the application of various models—including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Neural Networks—in key domains such as water demand prediction, accurate evapotranspiration estimation, and irrigation system performance assessment. The literature reveals that the use of hybrid models integrating multi-source data (remote sensing, IoT sensors, and ground observations) significantly enhances decision-making accuracy in water management. This approach not only addresses the challenges posed by climate instability but also paves the way for the development of intelligent and adaptive irrigation systems essential for strengthening water resource resilience.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Climate change, by causing severe fluctuations in precipitation, temperature, and evapotranspiration patterns, has imposed increasing and unpredictable challenges on global water resource management, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Under conditions where access to fresh water is severely reduced and food security is threatened, enhancing Water Use Efficiency (WUE) is considered the most effective strategy for adapting to water scarcity and maintaining global food security, serving as the most vital index for evaluating the efficiency of water resource utilization. However, assessing and optimizing WUE under a changing climate is a complex and multi-dimensional problem, as the relationships between climatic variables, soil properties, vegetation cover, and management activities possess a non-linear and dynamic nature. These complexities severely restrict the efficacy of traditional physical and linear statistical models, which rely on stability assumptions, thus highlighting the necessity for advanced analytical tools.

Methodology

This comprehensive review article aims to fill the existing gap in the research literature by systematically analyzing the role of Data-Driven Approaches (DDA), including Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and hybrid models, in optimizing water use efficiency under climatic uncertainty. Relying on big data analytics and the capability to understand hidden and non-linear relationships, DDA emerges as an efficient and forward-looking approach, serving as a suitable alternative to models based on predefined assumptions. The literature review focuses on the application of these models in predicting crop water requirements, estimating evapotranspiration, and evaluating the performance of irrigation systems.

Mechanisms and Key Applications

Data-Driven Approaches operate by extracting knowledge from large and diverse sets of information, encompassing climatic, hydrological, agricultural, remote sensing, and Internet of Things (IoT) sensor data. These models are capable of reducing high uncertainties in water management processes and providing more accurate predictions of vital variables such as soil moisture and actual Evapotranspiration (ET). The role of DDA in optimizing WUE is concentrated in four key areas: 1. Forecasting crop water demand, 2. Estimating and optimizing actual Evapotranspiration (ET), 3. Analyzing the performance of irrigation systems, and 4. Assessing the impacts of climate change on water productivity. These approaches cover three main analytical levels: Descriptive (understanding the current status and historical trends), Predictive (modeling the future behavior of systems), and most importantly, Prescriptive or Decision-Making (providing optimal and automated recommendations for the amount, timing, and method of irrigation in AI-based Smart Irrigation systems).

Model Comparison

Data-driven models are primarily categorized into three groups: Classical Machine Learning (e.g., Random Forest, SVM) which offer good interpretability and simplicity for medium-sized data; Deep Learning (e.g., CNN, RNN) which excel in processing massive data and modeling complex temporal and spatial relationships, yet require extensive computational resources and data, and suffer from interpretation challenges; and Hybrid Models (integrating physical models with ML/DL) which achieve the highest prediction accuracy, generalizability, and efficiency, even under data limitations, by leveraging the strengths of both approaches. The final conclusion emphasizes that combining multi-source data with intelligent algorithms significantly enhances decision-making accuracy in water management, paving the way for the development of smart irrigation systems and integrated water resource management. Data-Driven Approaches, despite challenges like data quality and the low interpretability of deep models, represent an unprecedented opportunity to elevate water resource management from a descriptive level to an intelligent and adaptive level, increasing resilience in the era of climate change.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ahmed, A. A., Sayed, S., Abdoulhalik, A., Moutari, S., & Oyedele, L. (2024). Applications of machine learning to water resources management: A review of present status and future opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 441, 140715.
Ahmed, A. M., Deo, R. C., Feng, Q., Ghahramani, A., Raj, N., Yin, Z., & Yang, L. (2021). Deep learning hybrid model with Boruta-Random forest optimiser algorithm for streamflow forecasting with climate mode indices, rainfall, and periodicity. Journal of Hydrology, 599, 126350.
Ahmed, Z., Gui, D., Murtaza, G., Yunfei, L., & Ali, S. (2023). An overview of smart irrigation management for improving water productivity under climate change in drylands. Agronomy, 13(8), 2113.
Al Naggar, Y., Fahmy, N. M., Alkhaibari, A. M., Al-Akeel, R. K., Alharbi, H. M., Mohamed, A., ... & Alharbi, H. A. (2025). Mechanisms and Genetic Drivers of Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides and Approaches to Its Control. Toxics13(8), 681.
Amani, S., & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H. (2023). A review of machine learning models and influential factors for estimating evapotranspiration using remote sensing and ground-based data. Agricultural water management284, 108324.
Ashoka, P., Devi, B. R., Sharma, N., Behera, M., Gautam, A., Jha, A., & Sinha, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in water management for sustainable farming: a review. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(6), 511-525.
Başağaoğlu, H., Chakraborty, D., Lago, C. D., Gutierrez, L., Şahinli, M. A., Giacomoni, M., ... & Şengör, S. S. (2022). A review on interpretable and explainable artificial intelligence in hydroclimatic applications. Water, 14(8), 1230.
Bwambale, E., Abagale, F. K., & Anornu, G. K. (2023). Data-driven modelling of soil moisture dynamics for smart irrigation scheduling. Smart Agricultural Technology5, 100251.
Chellaiah, C., Anbalagan, S., Swaminathan, D., Chowdhury, S., Kadhila, T., Shopati, A. K., ... & Amesho, K. T. (2024). Integrating deep learning techniques for effective river water quality monitoring and management. Journal of Environmental Management370, 122477.
Dehghanisanij, H., Emami, H., Emami, S., & Rezaverdinejad, V. (2022). A hybrid machine learning approach for estimating the water-use efficiency and yield in agriculture. Scientific Reports12(1), 6728.
Del-Coco, M., Leo, M., & Carcagnì, P. (2024). Machine learning for smart irrigation in agriculture: How far along are we?. Information15(6), 306.
Duan, Y., Akula, S., Kumar, S., Lee, W., & Khajehei, S. (2023). A hybrid physics–AI model to improve hydrological forecasts. Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 2(1), e220023.
Eggimann, S., Mutzner, L., Wani, O., Schneider, M. Y., Spuhler, D., Moy de Vitry, M., ... & Maurer, M. (2017). The potential of knowing more: A review of data-driven urban water management. Environmental science & technology51(5), 2538-2553.
El Bilali, A., Taleb, A., & Brouziyne, Y. (2021). Groundwater quality forecasting using machine learning algorithms for irrigation purposes. Agricultural Water Management245, 106625.
Farfán-Durán, J. F., & Cea, L. (2024). Streamflow forecasting with deep learning models: A side-by-side comparison in Northwest Spain. Earth Science Informatics, 17(6), 5289-5315.
Fu, X., Jiang, J., Wu, X., Huang, L., Han, R., Li, K., ... & Wang, Z. (2024). Deep learning in water protection of resources, environment, and ecology: Achievement and challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research31(10), 14503-14536.
Gerten, D., Lucht, W., Ostberg, S., Heinke, J., Kowarsch, M., Kreft, H., ... & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2013). Asynchronous exposure to global warming: freshwater resources and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Research Letters8(3), 034032.
Ghobadi, F., & Kang, D. (2023). Application of machine learning in water resources management: a systematic literature review. Water, 15(4), 620.
Goap, A., Sharma, D., Shukla, A. K., & Krishna, C. R. (2018). An IoT based smart irrigation management system using Machine learning and open source technologies. Computers and electronics in agriculture155, 41-49.
Hajirad, I. (2025). Optimizing pulsed and continuous drip irrigation strategies to enhance yield and water productivity of silage maize in semi-arid regions. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 11(1), 2583753.
Hammouch, H., El-Yacoubi, M., Qin, H., & Berbia, H. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of intelligent irrigation systems. IEEE Access.
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.
Hoover, D. L., Abendroth, L. J., Browning, D. M., Saha, A., Snyder, K., Wagle, P., ... & Scott, R. L. (2023). Indicators of water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems and spatiotemporal scales. Science of the Total Environment, 864, 160992.
Howell, T. A. (2001). Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy journal93(2), 281-289.
Huang, Q., Du, Y., & Yi, C. (2025). Assessing the role of artificial intelligence in improving urban climate resilience: theoretical framework based on technological innovation systems. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1-23.
Jaiswal, N., Kumar, T. V., & Shukla, C. (2025). Smart drip irrigation systems using IoT: a review of architectures, machine learning models, and emerging trends. Discover Agriculture, 3(1), 253.
Janani, M., & Jebakumar, R. (2019). A study on smart irrigation using machine learning. Cell & Cellular Life Sciences Journal4(1), 1-8.
Jiang, Y., Li, C., Sun, L., Guo, D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, W. (2021). A deep learning algorithm for multi-source data fusion to predict water quality of urban sewer networks. Journal of Cleaner Production318, 128533.
Kazemi Garajeh, M., Akbari, R., Aghaei Chaleshtori, S., Shenavaei Abbasi, M., Tramutoli, V., Lim, S., & Sadeqi, A. (2024). A comprehensive assessment of climate change and anthropogenic effects on surface Water resources in the Lake Urmia Basin, Iran. Remote Sensing16(11), 1960.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature521(7553), 436-444.
Lee, D. Y., Lee, D. S., Cha, Y., Min, J. H., & Park, Y. S. (2023). Data-driven models for predicting community changes in freshwater ecosystems: a review. Ecological Informatics, 77, 102163.
Li, X., Li, J., & Yang, K. (2022). Feature importance analysis and machine learning applications in water resources management: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Hydrology, 609, 127731.
Li, X., Xue, F., Ding, J., Xu, T., Song, L., Pang, Z., ... & Zhang, Y. (2024). A hybrid model coupling physical constraints and machine learning to estimate daily evapotranspiration in the heihe River Basin. Remote Sensing16(12), 2143.
Manny, L. (2023). Socio-technical challenges towards data-driven and integrated urban water management: A socio-technical network approach. Sustainable Cities and Society90, 104360.
Manny, L. (2023). Socio-technical challenges towards data-driven and integrated urban water management: A socio-technical network approach. Sustainable Cities and Society90, 104360.
Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water10(11), 1536.
Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., & Chau, K.-W. (2019). Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water, 11(12), 2510.
Otamendi, U., Maiza, M., Olaizola, I. G., Sierra, B., Florez, M., & Quartulli, M. (2024). Integrated water resource management in the Segura Hydrographic Basin: An artificial intelligence approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122526.
Parra-López, C., Abdallah, S. B., Garcia-Garcia, G., Hassoun, A., Trollman, H., Jagtap, S., ... & Carmona-Torres, C. (2025). Digital technologies for water use and management in agriculture: Recent applications and future outlook. Agricultural Water Management, 309, 109347.
Sami, M., Khan, S. Q., Khurram, M., Farooq, M. U., Anjum, R., Aziz, S., ... & Sadak, F. (2022). A deep learning-based sensor modeling for smart irrigation system. Agronomy12(1), 212.
Sami, S., Khan, A., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Deep learning-based virtual sensing for improving smart irrigation system reliability. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 107012.
Sayari, S., Mahdavi-Meymand, A., & Zounemat-Kermani, M. (2021). Irrigation water infiltration modeling using machine learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture180, 105921.
Shah, W., Chen, J., Ullah, I., & Shah, M. H. (2024). Application of RNN-LSTM in predicting drought patterns in pakistan: A pathway to sustainable water resource management. Water, 16(11), 1492.
Sharma, A., et al. (2023). AI-driven selection of drought-tolerant and water-efficient crop varieties. Plant Science, 328, 111537.
Sharma, N., Raman, H., Wheeler, D., Kalenahalli, Y., & Sharma, R. (2023). Data-driven approaches to improve water-use efficiency and drought resistance in crop plants. Plant Science336, 111852.
Shen, C., Wang, H., & Chen, Y. (2021). Limitations and interpretability challenges of classical machine learning models in hydrological predictions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 144, 105137.
Shen, C., Wang, L., & Li, X. (2021). Hybrid deep learning models for simulating climate change impacts on agricultural water use efficiency.
Shortridge, J. E., Guikema, S. D., & Zaitchik, B. F. (2016). Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences20(7), 2611-2628.
Sinclair, T. R., & Rufty, T. W. (2012). Nitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant genetics. Global Food Security1(2), 94-98.
Slater, L., Blougouras, G., Deng, L., Deng, Q., Ford, E., Hoek van Dijke, A., ... & Zhang, B. (2025). Challenges and opportunities of ML and explainable AI in large-sample hydrology. Philosophical Transactions A, 383(2302), 20240287.
Tipon Tanchangya, A. R., Rahman, J., & Ridwan, M. (2024). A review of deep learning applications for sustainable water resource management. Global sustainability research3(4), 48-73.
Vaquet, V., Hinder, F., Artelt, A., Ashraf, I., Strotherm, J., Vaquet, J., ... & Hammer, B. (2024, September). Challenges, methods, data–a survey of machine learning in water distribution networks. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 155-170). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Vij, A., Vijendra, S., Jain, A., Bajaj, S., Bassi, A., & Sharma, A. (2020). IoT and machine learning approaches for automation of farm irrigation system. Procedia Computer Science167, 1250-1257.
Wang, X., Feng, Y., Cui, Y., & Guo, B. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Water Use Efficiency and Its Response to Extreme Climate in Northwestern Sichuan Plateau. Sustainability, 15(15), 11786.
Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Yuan, M., Yin, W., Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., & Hu, X. (2025). A machine learning-based irrigation prediction model for cherry tomatoes in greenhouses: Leveraging optimal growth data for precision irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture237, 110558.
Wei, H., Xu, W., Kang, B., Eisner, R., Muleke, A., Rodriguez, D., ... & Harrison, M. T. (2024). Irrigation with artificial intelligence: problems, premises, promises. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems4(2), 187-205.
Workneh, A., et al. (2025). Hybrid deep learning models for river discharge prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 632, 129220.
Workneh, H., & Jha, M. (2025). Utilizing Hybrid Deep Learning Models for Streamflow Prediction. Water17(13), 1913.
Younes, A., Abou Elassad, Z. E., El Meslouhi, O., Abou Elassad, D. E., & Majid, E. D. A. (2024). The application of machine learning techniques for smart irrigation systems: A systematic literature review. Smart Agricultural Technology7, 100425.
Zeynoddin, M., Gumiere, S. J., & Bonakdari, H. (2023). Enhancing water use efficiency in precision irrigation: data-driven approaches for addressing data gaps in time series. Frontiers in Water, 5, 1237592.
Zhang, J., Ren, W., An, P., Pan, Z., Wang, L., Dong, Z., ... & Tian, H. (2015). Responses of crop water use efficiency to climate change and agronomic measures in the semiarid area of northern China. PloS one, 10(9), e0137409.
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., & Walker, G. R. (2001). Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water resources research37(3), 701-708.
Zhao, H., Di, L., Guo, L., Zhang, C., & Lin, L. (2023). An automated data-driven irrigation scheduling approach using model simulated soil moisture and evapotranspiration. Sustainability15(17), 12908.
Zhao, L., et al. (2025). Optimizing irrigation scheduling using machine learning and multi-source data. Agricultural Systems, 224, 103123.
Zhao, W., Duan, L., Ma, B., Meng, X., Ren, L., Ye, D., & Rui, S. (2025). Applications of Optimization Methods in Automotive and Agricultural Engineering: A Review. Mathematics13(18), 3018.
Zhao, X., Wang, H., Bai, M., Xu, Y., Dong, S., Rao, H., & Ming, W. (2024). A comprehensive review of methods for hydrological forecasting based on deep learning. Water16(10), 1407.
Zhao, X., Wang, H., Bai, M., Xu, Y., Dong, S., Rao, H., & Ming, W. (2024). A comprehensive review of methods for hydrological forecasting based on deep learning. Water, 16(10), 1407.
Zhu, F., Zhu, O., Han, M., Liu, W., Guo, X., Hou, T., ... & Zhong, P. A. (2025). A hybrid process-data driven framework for real-time hydrological forecasting with interpretable deep learning. Journal of Hydrology, 134082.