Application of Game Theory in the Reallocation of Agricultural Water to Improve Water Use Efficiency

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. in Water Resource Management, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Ph.D. in Water Resource Management, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

3 associate professor, water eng. group, Imam Khomeini International University، Qazvin

Abstract

In recent years the water allocated for the Qazvin irrigation network has reached a staggering level of reduction at half the agreed upon total. Rather than the original allocation of 250 million cubic meters per year, it has dropped below 120 million cubic meters per year. An assessment of the situation shows that in addition to the nearly 50% reduction of water flowing in, the actual distribution pattern of water to the farmers remains unchanged. The objective of this study is to reallocate water among farmers in the Qazvin irrigation network in order to resolve existing disparities among them. To this end, the income of each farmer was first calculated under the current non-cooperative condition. Then, assuming the establishment of full cooperation, a genetic algorithm was employed to optimize the allocation of 122 million cubic meters of water within the network. Subsequently, to encourage participation, the additional benefits generated through cooperation were redistributed among farmers using the Shapley value theory. The results demonstrate that if farmers cooperate in water extraction, not only will all of them earn higher profits compared to the current situation, but the total profit will also increase significantly by about 104% (from 8.902 to 18.233 million USD). The combined application of the genetic algorithm and Shapley value theory can serve as an effective approach in managing conflicts, enhancing equity in resource allocation, and improving the economic efficiency of irrigation networks.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

The Iranian agriculture has been consistently threatened by frequent droughts, sudden groundwater level declines, and decreased surface flow. The Qazvin plain, It covers an estimated area of about 4,400–4,500 km² and plays a key role in supplying diverse agricultural products at the national level, has been subject to severe water shortages due to both climate-based and growing pressures by domestic, industrial, and environmental uses. Based on recent studies, it has been pointed out that risk concerns of farmers due to price fluctuation and unstableness of income have been a source of over-extraction of groundwater resources. Particularly, economic modeling of crop prices through artificial neural networks and inverse demand functions has pointed out that market uncertainty boosts rigid cropping behavior and additional pressures on aquifer systems. Since farmers’ behavior during water shortage is very much determined by private economic incentives, cooperative game theory offers a sturdy analytical tool to eliminate conflict and distribute equitable reallocation of water. This is particularly relevant in semi-arid regions like Qazvin, where conflicts over water use are frequent and require equitable, transparent mechanisms to ensure stakeholder cooperation.

Purpose

This study aims to develop an integrated framework for optimizing the reallocation of water resources in the Qazvin irrigation network using a combination of genetic algorithms and cooperative game theory (Shapley value). The goal is to increase overall economic returns while ensuring fairness and motivating user participation in collective water management.

Method

We used a mixed-methods quantitative design. Using data from the 2015-2016 agricultural year, the net income of each secondary canal was first calculated, assuming the non-cooperative scenario was occurring. Then, under the cooperative scenario full cooperation by all stakeholders was assumed, we used a genetic algorithm to discover the optimal flow of 122 million cubic meters (MCM) of water across 11 secondary canals over a time period of 12 months. Finally, we applied the Shapley value to distribute surplus benefits of cooperation. Whatever each stakeholder "made" at a minimum would not be less than their current income

Results

The results showed the direct cooperative redistribution income led to a total income of 104% higher income than the current situation, however under the sequence of the optimized allocation some canals (for example, L6 and L8) had income that was lower than their current allocation. However, under the socially sustainable sequence of using the Shapley value for a fair redistribution meant that all users would have an income not less than their current income, with the surplus of each stakeholder distributed based on their marginal contribution. This led to fair benefit sharing, along with eliminating any significant incentives to conflict, and meant that the potential for realization in the 'real world' was a legitimate possibility.

Conclusions

This study supports the use of optimization techniques in conjunction with cooperative game theory as a way of resolving resource conflicts. By integrating cooperative game theory with optimization techniques, cooperative solutions can emerge for shared resources, enhancing total economic production and associated fairness to stimulate voluntary participation. It can also serve as a template for water allocation for example, and other semi-arid agricultural regions with similar socio-environmental contexts.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authorship contribution

Conceptualization, Mazandarani Zadeh H.; methodology, Mazandarani Zadeh H.; software, Sarafha M.; validation, Sarafha M., Mazandarani Zadeh H; formal analysis, Sarafha M., Mazandarani Zadeh H.; investigation, Sarafha M. and Mazandarani Zadeh H.; resources, Sarafha M.; data curation, Sarafha M.; writing—original draft preparation, Hashemi M. and kakavand Sh.; writing—review and editing, Mazandarani Zadeh H; kakavand Sh and Hashemi M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

The authors did not use artificial intelligence during the preparation of this work and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Data availability statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, and any form of misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abdolmanafi Jahromi, N. & Asadi, M. (2024). Review and analysis of macro indicators of the water sector in the last quarter of 1402 (Quarterly Report 4). Monthly magazine of expert reports of the Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center.  32(1), e19700 doi: 10.22034/report.2024.16749.1698. (In Persian).
Abed-Elmdoust, A., Kerachian, R., & Ziari, S. (2016). Evaluating the Relative Power of Water Users in Inter-Basin Water Transfer Systems. Water Resources Management, 30(11), 3863–3885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1407-1
Abedi. S, (2020). Water Governance and Evaluation of its Impacts on Water and Food Security, Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 1-12. (In Persian).
Banihashemi, S., Eslamian, S. S., & Nazari, B. (2021). Prediction of Local Alterations in the Relative Amounts of Temperature and Precipitation Caused by Climate Change in Near and Far Future, and Drought Investigation Using SPI and SPEI Indices in Qazvin Plain, Iran. Journal of Hydrology and Soil Science, 25(2), 25–44. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2328026 LK  - https://www.magiran.com/paper/2328026
Bi, F., Zhou, H., Zhu, M., & Wang, W. (2022). Economic benefit evaluation of water resources allocation in transboundary basins based on particle swarm optimization algorithm and cooperative game model—A case study of Lancang-Mekong River Basin. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0265350-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265350
Boyd, N. T., Gabriel, S. A., Rest, G., & Dumm, T. (2023). Generalized Nash equilibrium models for asymmetric, non-cooperative games on line graphs: Application to water resource systems. Computers & Operations Research, 154, 106194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106194
Bulukazari, S., Babazadeh, H., Ebrahimipak, N., Mousavi-Jahromi, S.-H., & Ramezani Etedali, H. (2022). Optimization of water and land allocation in salinity and deficit- irrigation conditions at farm level in Qazvin plain. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0269663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269663
Dastjerdi, S. Z., Sharifi, E., Rahbar, R., & Saghafian, B. (2022). Downscaling WGHM-Based Groundwater Storage Using Random Forest Method: A Regional Study over Qazvin Plain, Iran. Hydrology, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9100179
Degefu, D. M., He, W., Yuan, L., & Zhao, J. H. (2016). Water Allocation in Transboundary River Basins under Water Scarcity: a Cooperative Bargaining Approach. Water Resources Management, 30(12), 4451–4466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1431-6
Dinar, A., & Howitt, R. E. (1997). Mechanisms for allocation of environmental control cost: empirical tests of acceptability and stability. Environmental Management, 49(2), 183–203.
Fakhar, M. S., & Kaviani, A. (2022). Evaluation of FAO Wapor Product and PYSEBAL Algorithm in Estimating the Amount of Water Consumed. Soil and Water Research, 37(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2023.81695.1267. (In Persian).
FAO. 2014. Water Governance for Agriculture and Food Security, a FAO initiative to minimize its environmental impact and promote greener communications. Other documents can be consulted at www.fao.org.
Fisvold, G. B., & Caswell, M. F. (2000). Transboundary water management: game theoretic lessons for projects on the US–Mexico border. Journal of Agricultural Economics 24, 101–111.
Fu, J., Zhong, P., Xu, B., Zhu, F., Chen, J., & Li, J. (2021). Comparison of Transboundary Water Resources Allocation Models Based on Game Theory and Multi-Objective Optimization. Water, 13, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101421
Ghaffari Moghadam, Z., Moradi, E., Hashemi Tabar, M., & Sardar Shahraki, A. (2023). Developing a Bi-level programming model for water allocation based on Nerlove’s supply response theory and water market. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(6), 5663–5689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02658-z
Hashemi, S. R., Tabesh, M., & Ataeekia, B. (2024). Multi-objective optimization of water distribution systems using game theory and genetic algorithms. Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5842
Hashemi, V., Taleai, M., & Abolhasani, S. (2024). Enhancing agricultural land valuation in land consolidation projects through cooperative game theory and genetic algorithm optimization. Habitat International, 152, 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2024.103157
Hemati, H., & Abrishamchi, A. (2020). Water allocation using game theory under climate change impact (case study: Zarinehrood). Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.153
Hosseini, S. M. and Mazandarani Zadeh, H. (2025). Comparison of the ability of inverse demand function and artificial neural network to predict crop prices (Case Study: Qazvin Plain Irrigation Network). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 48(2), 35-47. doi: 10.22055/jise.2024.45614.2109. (In Persian).
Imani, S., Niksokhan, M. H., Delavar, M., & Safari Shali, R. (2023). Water allocation sustainability assessment in climate change: a modeling approach using water footprint and just policy. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(11), 4261–4272. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.534.
Jahromi, N. S, & Asadi.M. (2024). Review and Analysis of Macroeconomic Indicators of the Water Sector in the Final Quarter of 1402 (Fourth Quarterly Report). Monthly Expert Reports of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. . (In Persian).
Janjua, S., An-Vo, D.-A., Reardon-Smith, K., & Mushtaq, S. (2025). A Three-stage Cooperative Game Model for Water Resource Allocation Under Scarcity Using Bankruptcy Rules, Nash Bargaining Solution and TOPSIS. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04123-8.
Kakavand, S. , Mazandarani zadeh, H. and Ramezani Etedali, H. (2023). Optimal Redistribution of Water among Agricultural Sector Operators Using a Fuzzy Multi-objective Optimization Model. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering46(1), 77-93. doi: 10.22055/jise.2021.37122.1966. (In Persian).
Kayhomayoon, Z., Milan, S. G., Arya Azar, N., Bettinger, P., Babaian, F., & Jaafari, A. (2022). A Simulation-Optimization Modeling Approach for Conjunctive Water Use Management in a Semi-Arid Region of Iran. In Sustainability (Vol. 14, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052691
Khorshidi, M. S., Nikoo, M. R., Al-Rawas, G., Bahrami, N., Al-Wardy, M., Talebbeydokhti, N., & Gandomi, A. H. (2024). Integrating agent-based modeling and game theory for optimal water resource allocation within complex hierarchical systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 482, 144164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.144164
Madani, K. (2010). Game theory and water resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.045
Mazandarani zadeh, hamed, & Hoseini, M. (2023). Investigating the effect of agricultural product price forecasting on groundwater level using systems dynamics, in order to simultaneously maintain the welfare of farmers and groundwater resources. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 53(11), 2565–2582. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2022.345131.669305. (In Persian).
Mazandarani zadeh, H. and Hosseini, S. M. (2025). Assessing the Economic Efficiency of Water Distribution in the Agricultural Sector through Crop Pattern Modification (Case Study: Qazvin Plain Irrigation Network). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 48(1), 39-57. doi: 10.22055/jise.2023.43268.2061. (In Persian).
Mehrparvar,  Milad, Ahmadi,  Azadeh, & Safavi,  Hamid Reza. (2019). Resolving water allocation conflicts using WEAP simulation model and non-cooperative game theory. SIMULATION, 96(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549719844827
Mirzaei-Nodoushan, F., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2022). Evaluation of cooperative and non-cooperative game theoretic approaches for water allocation of transboundary rivers. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 3991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07971-1
Moghaddam, H. K., Javadi, S., Randhir, T. O., & Kavehkar, N. (2022). A Multi-Indicator, Non-Cooperative Game Model to Resolve Conflicts for Aquifer Restoration. Water Resources Management, 36(14), 5521–5543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03310-1
Parrachino, I., Dinar, A., & Patrone, F. (2006). Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 3. Application to water resources. In World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (Issue 4074).
Rashidi, M., Talebi, A., Raeisi, A., & Dezfoulian, M. (2022). Application of cooperative game theory in transboundary groundwater resources management. Water and Land Development, 54, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2022.141552
Rashidi, M., Zarghami, M., Pishbahar, E., & Fallahi, F. (2022). Assessing coalition in meeting environmental flow based on Shapley value and nash equilibrium: case study Aras River. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(7), 6521–6530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03855-5
Sadegh, M., Mahjouri, N., & Kerachian, R. (2010). Optimal Inter-Basin Water Allocation Using Crisp and Fuzzy Shapley Games. Water Resources Management, 24(10), 2291–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9552-9
Sechi, G. M., & Zucca, R. (2015). Water Costs Allocation in Complex Systems Using a Cooperative Game Theory Approach. Water Resources Management, 29(6), 1781–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0910-8
Shapley, L. S. (1953). A Value for n-Person Games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games (pp. 307–317). Princeton University Press.
Shokoohi, A., Ramezani Etedali, H., Mojtabavi, S. A., & Singh, V. P. (2016). Using Water Footprint Accounting for Optimizing Crop Patterns Respecting Sustainable Development (Case Study: Qazvin Plain). Iran-Water Resources Research, 12(3), 99–113. https://www.iwrr.ir/article_32628.html
Taha, Z., Abdullah, A., & Rashid, T. (2024). Optimizing Feature Selection with Genetic Algorithms: A Review of Methods and Applications. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.14563
Tharwat, A., Sabry, M. M., & El-Khodary, I. (2024). A Cooperative Game Approach for Solving Water Resources Allocation Problem BT  - ICT for Engineering & Critical Infrastructures (A. Salman & A. Tharwat (eds.); pp. 23–31). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Wanniarachchi, S., & Sarukkalige, R. (2022). A Review on Evapotranspiration Estimation in Agricultural Water Management: Past, Present, and Future. Hydrology, 9(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9070123
Wu, X., & Whittington, D. (2006). Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: A case study of the Nile Basin. Water Resources Research, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004238
Yoosefdoost, I., Abrão, T., & Santos, M. J. (2021). Water Resource Management Aided by Game Theory. In O. Bozorg-Haddad (Ed.), Essential Tools for Water Resources Analysis, Planning, and Management (pp. 217–262). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4295-8_9
Yoosefdoost, I., Khashei-Siuki, A., Tabari, H., & Mohammadrezapour, O. (2021). Runoff simulation under climate change conditions by using of hybrid bat-based support vector machine neural network. Hydrological Sciences Journa, 66(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1873343
Zhang, K., Lu, H., & Wang, B. (2024). Benefit Distribution Mechanism of a Cooperative Alliance for Basin Water Resources from the Perspective of Cooperative Game Theory. Sustainability, 16, 6729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166729
Zheng, H., Wang, Z., Hu, S., & Wei, Y. (2022). A comparative study of the performance of bankruptcy methods for water allocation in river systems. Water Resources Management, 36(4), 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03087-3
Zheng, Y., Sang, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., & Liu, P. (2022). Water Allocation Management Under Scarcity: a Bankruptcy Approach. Water Resources Management, 36(9), 2891–2912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03098-0