Numerical Assessment of the Impact of Kani Goozhan and Chouman Dams on Floodplain Mapping and Flood Hazard in the Chouman Watershed

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Floods are among the most destructive natural hazards, and accurate flood hazard zoning plays a crucial role in reducing human and economic losses. In this study, a combined approach based on remote sensing (RS), geographic information system (GIS), and numerical modeling was used to identify and map flood-prone areas in the Chouman watershed, located between the upstream Kani Goozhan Dam and the downstream Chouman Dam. Land-use maps were extracted and used to determine the runoff curve number in the HEC-HMS hydrological model and Manning roughness coefficients in the two-dimensional HEC-RAS hydraulic model. Based on rainfall data from the Baneh station, flood hydrographs were generated for different return periods. The results showed that, for the 200-year return period flood, the peak discharge decreased from about 420 to 210 cubic meters per second, and the Kani Goozhan Dam caused about a 50% reduction in flood magnitude and a delay of approximately 4.5 hours in the peak flow time. Downstream, the maximum flow velocity at critical locations reached about 19 meters per second, which was reduced to nearly 13 meters per second through the simultaneous operation of the spillway and two bottom outlets. From an innovation perspective, this study integrates multi-source RS data, a digital elevation model, and coupled hydrological–hydraulic modeling within a GIS environment to not only delineate high-risk flood zones, but also, for the first time, to quantify the impact of two cascade dams on peak discharge, flood timing, and flood hazard patterns in a data-scarce mountainous basin.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Floods represent one of the most devastating natural hazards, posing severe threats to human lives and infrastructure, particularly in mountainous regions where data scarcity complicates accurate risk assessment. Effective floodplain delineation is vital for informed flood risk management and mitigation strategies. In areas with limited ground-based observations, integrating remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems (GIS) with advanced numerical modeling provides a robust alternative for generating reliable hazard maps. This approach leverages satellite-derived datasets to supply essential inputs, such as high-resolution land cover and topographic information, for hydrological and hydraulic simulations. The present investigation centers on the Chouman Watershed in Kurdistan Province, Iran, situated between the upstream Kani Goozhan Dam and the downstream Chouman Dam. The core objective is to evaluate the dams' influence on flood routing characteristics while delineating vulnerable zones in the inter-reservoir reach, thereby supporting enhanced decision-making in flood-prone rural settings.

Method

Encompassing roughly 860 km² of predominantly rugged terrain, the study area required spatially detailed inputs to overcome observational constraints. High-resolution (10 m) land use classification from the ESRI global dataset was employed to estimate runoff curve numbers (CN) via the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) methodology in hydrological modeling, alongside distributed Manning's roughness values for hydraulic computations. The ALOS digital elevation model (30 m resolution) facilitated basin delineation and reservoir geometry extraction. Intensity-duration-frequency relationships were derived from long-term records at the nearby Baneh synoptic station. Hydrological simulations were conducted using HEC-HMS v4.8, partitioning the watershed into 77 sub-basins and incorporating storage routing for the dams under multiple release scenarios. Two-dimensional unsteady hydraulic modeling in HEC-RAS v6.1 solved the shallow water equations, applying outflow hydrographs from HEC-HMS as upstream boundaries. Model calibration and validation utilized statistical frequency analysis (including log-Pearson Type III distributions) of available hydrometric data. Post-processing in ArcGIS yielded detailed inundation extents for return periods of 25, 50, 100, and 200 years.

Results

Validation efforts indicated strong model performance, with peak flow discrepancies typically under 20%. Key findings underscored the substantial attenuating effect of the upstream Kani Goozhan reservoir: for the 200-year event, peak outflows dropped markedly by around 50% (420 to 210 m³/s), accompanied by a notable 4.5-hour lag in hydrograph timing. Downstream hydraulic analyses showed peak velocities reaching 19 m/s in unregulated conditions, but manageable to approximately 13 m/s—or lower through phased releases—via coordinated spillway and bottom outlet activation. Reservoir levels at the Chouman Dam fluctuated between 30 and 40 m across simulated events, affording extended response windows. Inundation mapping exposed several rural communities positioned directly within high-hazard zones during extreme floods, emphasizing elevated vulnerability along the river corridor.

Conclusions

By fusing remote sensing products (including ESRI land cover and ALOS topography) with coupled HEC-HMS and 2D HEC-RAS frameworks, this work establishes a practical, resource-efficient pipeline for flood hazard delineation in challenging, data-poor terrains. The tandem dam system proves instrumental in moderating flood peaks, curtailing velocities, and prolonging lead times for evacuation and intervention, ultimately bolstering community resilience. The resulting hazard maps furnish actionable insights for synchronized reservoir operations, early warning infrastructure, and targeted protective measures in exposed settlements. This integrated methodology holds broad applicability for sustainable water resource stewardship and disaster preparedness in comparable mountainous contexts.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authorship contribution

Kiomars Roshangar: Project management, study design, and result interpretation. Faezeh Shabani: Methodology development, data analysis, and result interpretation. Aydin Panahi: Data collection, and manuscript drafting and manuscript review. Javad Taherpour: Methodology development, data analysis, and result interpretation.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT in order to rewrite and edit the Persian and English text. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Data availability statement

Data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, and any form of misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Agrawal, A., Khan, A., & Raman, B. (2025). Multi-View Data Fusion in Feature and Decision Spaces for Flood Inundation Mapping. IGARSS 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2663–2667. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS55030.2025.11242749
Ansarifard, S., Eyvazi, M., kalantari, M., mohseni, B., Ghorbanifard, M., Moghaddam, H. J., & Nouri, M. (2024). Simulation of floods under the influence of effective factors in hydraulic and hydrological models using HEC-RAS and MIKE 21. Discover Water, 4(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00155-0
Azizian, A. (2018). Investigating the Application of Remote-Sensing Based DEMs in Hydraulic Simulation of Flood. Iran-Water Resources Research, 14(2), 219–231. (In Persian).
Binns, A. D. (2023). Preparing for severe flooding: Flood risk management research leading to better flood preparedness. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 16(3), e12936. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12936
Ceola, S., Domeneghetti, A., & Schumann, G. J. P. (2022). Unraveling Long-Term Flood Risk Dynamics Across the Murray-Darling Basin Using a Large-Scale Hydraulic Model and Satellite Data. Frontiers in Water, Volume 3-. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.797259
Courty, L. G., Soriano-Monzalvo, J. C., & Pedrozo-Acuña, A. (2019). Evaluation of open-access global digital elevation models (AW3D30, SRTM, and ASTER) for flood modelling purposes. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12(S1), e12550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12550
Dang, H., & Pokhrel, Y. (2024). Evolution of river regimes in the Mekong River basin over 8 decades and the role of dams in recent hydrological extremes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28(14), 3347–3365. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024
Elkhrachy, I. (2015). Flash Flood Hazard Mapping Using Satellite Images and GIS Tools: A case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007
Ghahraman, B., & Abkhezr, H. (2004). Improvement in Intensity-Duration-Frequency Relationships of Rainfall in Iran. JSTNAR, 8(2), 1–14. http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-420-en.html
Gumindoga, W., Liwonde, C., Rwasoka, D. T., Kowe, P., Maviza, A., Magidi, J., Chikwiramakomo, L., Mavaringana, M. de J. P., & Tshitende, E. (2024). Urban flash floods modeling in Mzuzu City, Malawi based on Sentinel and MODIS data. Frontiers in Climate, Volume 6-2024. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1284437
Heimhuber, V., Hannemann, J.-C., & Rieger, W. (2015). Flood Risk Management in Remote and Impoverished Areas—A Case Study of Onaville, Haiti. Water, 7(7), 3832–3860. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7073832
Hidayah, E., Halik, G., Indarto, I., & Khaulan, D. W. (2023). Flood hazard mapping of the Welang river, Pasuruan, East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 11(3), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2022.2114025
Jain, S. K., Beevers, L., Anandhi, A., & Kumar, D. N. (2022). Editorial: Flood Management: Multi-Disciplinary Approaches for Data Observation, Analysis, Forecasting, and Management. Frontiers in Environmental Science, Volume 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.888906
Joo, J., & Ryu, Y. (2025). Assessment of Downstream Flood Safety Based on Dam Operation Strategies for Extreme Rainfall Events. J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig, 25(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2025.25.3.209
Kaya, Y. Z., & Üneş, F. (2025). Comparison of three different satellite data on 2D flood modeling using HEC-RAS (5.0.7) software and investigating the improvement ability of the RAS Mapper tool. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 18(1), e13046. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13046
Khaddor, I., Achab, M., Soumali, M. R., Benjbara, A., & Alaoui, A. H. (2021). The impact of the construction of a dam on flood management. Civil Engineering Journal, 7(2), 343–356.
Khan, S. I., Hong, Y., Wang, J., Yilmaz, K. K., Gourley, J. J., Adler, R. F., Brakenridge, G. R., Policelli, F., Habib, S., & Irwin, D. (2011). Satellite Remote Sensing and Hydrologic Modeling for Flood Inundation Mapping in Lake Victoria Basin: Implications for Hydrologic Prediction in Ungauged Basins. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2057513
Khan, S., Khan, A. U., Alodah, A., Azeem, A., Waqas, M., Nahas, F., Rebouh, N. Y., & Youssef, Y. M. (2025). Climate-driven flood hazard assessment in data-scarce mountainous basins using a GIS-based machine learning and hydrodynamic modelling under CMIP6 SSP scenarios. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 1800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31390-7
Khodaei, H., Nasiri Saleh, F., Nobakht Dalir, A., & Zarei, E. (2025). Future flood susceptibility mapping under climate and land use change. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 12394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97008-0
Khoso, W. A., Waseem, M., Tanoli, M. A., & Baig, F. (2025). Flood risk susceptibility analysis in Larkana district Pakistan using multi criteria decision analysis and geospatial techniques. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 13633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96107-2
Mehrpourbernety, F., Fazloula, R., Emadi, A., Javaheri, N., & Gholami Sefidkouh, M. A. (2025). Flood Forecasting of the Tajan Watershed Using the Output of the Numerical Weather Prediction Model (GFS) and the HEC-HMS Hydrological Model. Jwmr, 16(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.61882/jwmr.2024.1279
Mtamba, J., der Velde, R., Ndomba, P., Zoltán, V., & Mtalo, F. (2015). Use of Radarsat-2 and Landsat TM Images for Spatial Parameterization of Manning’s Roughness Coefficient in Hydraulic Modeling. Remote Sensing, 7(1), 836–864. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100836
Mustafa, A., & Szydłowski, M. (2021). Application of different building representation techniques in HEC-RAS 2-D for urban flood modeling using the Toce River experimental case. PeerJ, 9, e11667. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11667
Peker, İ. B., Gülbaz, S., Demir, V., Orhan, O., & Beden, N. (2024). Integration of HEC-RAS and HEC-HMS with GIS in Flood Modeling and Flood Hazard Mapping. Sustainability, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031226
Renu, S., Reddy, B. S., Santhosh, S., Sreelekshmi, Lekshmi, V., Pramada, S. K., & Sridhar, V. (2025). Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling for Flood Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Periyar River Basin, Kerala, India. In Climate (Vol. 13, Issue 6, p. 129). https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13060129
Roushangar, K. , Panahi, A. & Alirezazadeh Sadaghyani, A. (2025). Kernel-driven prediction of discharge coefficient in semi-circular side weirs: a comparative machine learning perspective. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research,  56(10), 2735-2750. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2025.399575.669986 (In Persian).
Roushangar, K. & Panahi, A. (2025). Comparison of Channel Geometry Effects on Discharge Coefficient of Rectangular Side Weirs in Rectangular and Trapezoidal Channels Using Optimized Machine Learning Models. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation, 15(2), 1-12. (In Persian).
Roushangar,K. and Panahi,A. (2025). Hybrid learning-based estimation of discharge coefficient in triangular and trapezoidal side weirs using SVM optimized by HOA and RSA. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 19(6), 885-897. https://doi.org/10.22034/idj.2025.537571.2616 (In Persian).
Sekine, T., Yamanaka, A., Eda, T., Udagawa, T., & Busto, M. (2024). A GAN-Based SAR-Optical Data Fusion Approach for Enhanced Flood Mapping. IGARSS 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 8958–8962. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10641093
Tavakoly, A. A., Gutenson, J. L., Lewis, J. W., Follum, M. L., Rajib, A., LaHatte, W. C., & Hamilton, C. O. (2021). Direct Integration of Numerous Dams and Reservoirs Outflow in Continental Scale Hydrologic Modeling. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029544
Uuemaa, E., Ahi, S., Montibeller, B., Muru, M., & Kmoch, A. (2020). Vertical Accuracy of Freely Available Global Digital Elevation Models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM). Remote Sensing, 12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482
Venter, Z. S., Barton, D. N., Chakraborty, T., Simensen, T., & Singh, G. (2022). Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Datasets: A Comparison of Dynamic World, World Cover and Esri Land Cover. Remote Sensing, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164101
Xafoulis, N., Farsirotou, E., Kotsopoulos, S., & Psilovikos, A. (2026). Evaluation of a Computational Simulation Approach Combining GIS, 2D Hydraulic Software, and Deep Learning Technique for River Flood Extent Mapping. In Hydrology (Vol. 13, Issue 1, p. 26). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology13010026
Youssef, A. M., Pradhan, B., & Hassan, A. M. (2011). Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0551-1
Zhang, X., Shi, W., & Lv, Z. (2019). Uncertainty Assessment in Multitemporal Land Use/Cover Mapping with Classification System Semantic Heterogeneity. Remote Sensing, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212509