Synergistic Effect of Biochar and Microalgae on Improving the Physical Properties of a Fire-Affected Silt loam Soil

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Soil Science and Engineering- Faculty of Agricultural Sciences-, University of Guilan,-Rasht-Iran

2 Department of Soil Science and Engineering-Faculty of Agricultural Sciences- Rasht-Iran

3 Department of Soil Science and Engineering-Faculty of Agricultural Sciences-Rasht-Iran

Abstract

Nature-based solutions for the restoration of damaged soils are of great importance due to their consideration of intrinsic resilience and ecosystem sustainability. However, the efficacy of such methods, such as the application of biochar and photosynthetic microorganisms, in improving the properties of damaged soils needs to be examined. In the present study, a loamy silt soil from a fire-affected forest area in Roudbar, Gilan province, was collected and treated with 2% and 5% by weight biochar produced from pine wood residues (treatments B2 and B5), the microalgae Scenedesmus sp. (treatment S), and their combinations (treatments SB2 and SB5). After a six-month incubation period, some chemical and structural properties of the soil were measured. The mean comparison results showed that biochar and microalgae, both individually and in combination, significantly increased pH, organic carbon content, bulk density, porosity, and aggregate stability. Except for treatment S, all other biochar and microalgae treatments increased the soil's electrical conductivity (EC). Treatment SB5 showed the greatest effect, increasing soil organic carbon content and porosity by approximately 117% and 30%, respectively. The highest increase in mean weight diameter (MWD) was observed in treatment S, while the greatest increase in geometric mean diameter (GMD) and decrease in fractal dimension (FD) of aggregates were related to treatment SB2. A higher GMD indicates a more uniform size distribution, and a lower FD suggests less aggregate fragmentation in treatment SB2. Therefore, biochar, with its recalcitrant carbon content and ability to create porosity, along with microalgae through photosynthetic carbon fixation and the secretion of adhesive polysaccharides that bind soil aggregates—particularly in combined applications with a synergistic effect—effectively contributes to enhancing carbon storage and improving the stability of degraded soils.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Wildfires are a global threat to forest ecosystems, causing significant soil degradation and nutrient loss through volatilization and erosion. In Iran, wildfire frequency has increased, with over a thousand events annually in forested areas. Fire can drastically alter soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, including organic matter loss, reduced aggregate stability, increased bulk density, formation of hydrophobic compounds, and enhanced runoff. While traditional post-fire rehabilitation relies on engineering interventions, nature-based solutions such as biochar and soil microorganisms are gaining attention. Biochar, produced from pyrolyzed biomass including fire-damaged or pruned residues, enhances soil quality, carbon sequestration, and fertility. Microalgae and biological soil crusts improve soil structure through carbon fixation and extracellular polysaccharide production. Although the benefits of biochar and microalgae individually are documented, their combined effects remain underexplored. This study evaluates the effectiveness of pine-derived biochar and the microalga Scenedesmus sp., applied alone and together, in improving chemical, physical, and structural properties of wildfire-affected forest soils.

Materials and Methods

Soil samples were collected in autumn 2024 from three burned forest sites in Rudbar, Gilan Province, Iran, and combined to form representative composite samples. Biochar was produced from pine and fir branches via pyrolysis at 650 °C, followed by milling and sieving. The microalga Scenedesmus sp. was cultured to a concentration of 10⁸ cells mL⁻¹ and applied to the soil at 60% of field capacity. Experimental treatments included a control, biochar at 2% and 5%, microalgae, and their combinations (SB2 and SB5). Each unit contained 8 kg of soil in metal microplots (40 × 45 × 4 cm) and was incubated for six months under controlled conditions (20–25 °C, 60% water holding capacity). after incubation, soil samples were collected for laboratory analyses. Chemical properties—pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and soil organic carbon (SOC)—were determined, followed by assessment of physical and structural characteristics, including mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), fractal dimension, bulk density, particle density, and porosity. Soil pH was measured in a saturated paste, EC from the corresponding extract, and SOC by wet oxidation. Bulk and particle densities were determined using the clod and pycnometer methods, respectively. All measurements followed standard soil science protocols to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.

Results

The studied soil was alkaline with a silt loam texture. Pine-derived biochar had near-neutral pH, low electrical conductivity, and higher organic carbon with a reduced H/C ratio, indicating increased aromaticity and chemical stability, while SEM imaging revealed a highly porous structure that could enhance moisture and nutrient retention. Analysis of variance showed that treatments significantly affected chemical properties (pH, EC, organic carbon) at p < 0.01, and physical properties (MWD, GMD, fractal dimension, bulk density, porosity) at p < 0.01, with particle density significant at p < 0.05. application of biochar, single microalgae (S), and their combinations improved both chemical and physical soil properties. The S treatment slightly increased pH and reduced EC, while organic carbon increased most in SB5, highlighting the synergistic effect of biochar and microalgae on carbon cycling. SB5 also showed the greatest increases in MWD and GMD, decreased fractal dimension (Df) in SB5 and SB2, reduced bulk density, and highest porosity, reflecting improved aggregate stability and soil structure. overall, combining biochar and microalgae offers a sustainable, cost-effective, and eco-friendly strategy to rehabilitate fire-degraded soils, enhancing water infiltration, reducing erosion, supporting vegetation recovery, and promoting long-term resilience and functionality of forest ecosystems.

Conclusion

This study showed that biochar and microalgae, particularly in combination, have strong potential to restore fire-affected forest soils. Combined treatments improved key soil properties, including bulk density, porosity, aggregate stability, and organic carbon content, more effectively than individual applications. SB2 (2% biochar + microalgae) optimized stable aggregate distribution and porosity, while SB5 (5% biochar + microalgae) achieved the highest increase in soil organic carbon. An antagonistic effect on soil salinity was noted, warranting further investigation. Overall, the integration of biochar and microalgae offers a sustainable, cost-effective strategy to enhance soil structure, water infiltration, and erosion control, promoting vegetation recovery and the resilience of degraded forest ecosystems.

Funding:

The study was funded by the University of Guilan, Iran.

Authorship contribution:

Conceptualization, Sepideh Abrishamkesh.; methodology, Sepideh Abrishamkesh. and Nasrin Ghorbanzadeh; software, Mahsa Kouhestani ordoomahaleh; validation, Sepideh Abrishamkesh. and Nasrin Ghorbanzadeh. and Nafiseh Yaghmaeian; formal analysis, Sepideh Abrishamkesh. and Mahsa Kouhestani ordoomahaleh; resources, Mahsa Kouhestani ordoomahaleh. and Sepideh Abrishamkesh; data curation, Mahsa Kouhestani ordoomahaleh; writing—original draft preparation, Mahsa Kouhestani ordoomahaleh; writing—review and editing, Sepideh Abrishamkesh. and Nasrin Ghorbanzadeh. and Nafiseh Yaghmaeian. supervision, Sepideh Abrishamkesh; project administration, Sepideh Abrishamkesh; funding acquisition, Sepideh Abrishamkesh. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

The authorships didn’t use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.

Data availability statement:

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank all participants in the present study. The authors also would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions in manuscript revision.

Ethical considerations:

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, and any form of misconduct.

Conflict of interest:

 The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abiven, S., Menasseri, S., & Chenu, C. (2009). The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability: A literature analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.015
Agbeshie, A. A., Abugre, S., Atta-Darkwa, T., & Asare, R. O. (2022). A review of the effects of forest fire on soil properties. Journal of Forestry Research, 33, 1419–1441. http://dio.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01475-4
Andersen, R.A., (2013). The microalgal cell, in: Richmond, A., Hu, Q. (Eds.), Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology & Biotechnology. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118567166.ch1
Baiamonte, G., & Singh, V. P. (2017). Modelling the probability distribution of peak discharge for infiltrating hillslopes. Water Resources Research, 53(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019864
Barszcz, W., Koncewicz-Baran, M., & Skiba, D. (2024). Impact of pyrolysis process conditions on the structure of biochar. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 1105. http://dio.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61394-8
Blake, G. R., & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods (pp. 363–375). Soil Science Society of America, Inc. http://dio.org/10.12691/aees-3-5-1
Brennan, L., & Owende, P. (2010). Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, & extractions of biofuels & co-products. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), 557–577. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009
Burgeon, V., Fouché, J., Garré, S., Dekhordi, R. H., Colinet, G., & Cornelis, J.-T. (2022). Young and century-old biochars strongly affect nutrient cycling in a temperate agroecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 328, 107847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107847
Cantón, Y., Solé-Benet, A., Asensio, C., Chamizo, S., & Puigdefábregas, J. (2009). Aggregate stability in range sandy loam soils: Relationships with runoff and erosion. Catena, 77(3), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.09.008
Certini, G. (2005). Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia, 143(1), 1–10. http://dio.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8
Chagas, J. K. M., Figueiredo, C. C. de, & Ramos, M. L. G. (2022). Biochar increases soil carbon pools: Evidence from a global meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 305, 114403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114403
Chamizo S, Adessi A, Certini G, De Philippis R. (2020). Cyanobacteria inoculation as a potential tool for stabilization of burned soils. Restor Ecol, 28:S106-S114. http://dio.org/10.1111/rec.13092
Chatterjee, R., Madras, G., & Suresh, A. K. (2020). Effect of pyrolysis temperature on physico-chemical properties & gasification reactivity of sugarcane bagasse derived biochar. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00085
Chen, H., Yu, S., Yu, Z., Liu, M., & Pei, H. (2024). Phycoremediation potential of salt-tolerant microalgal species: Motion, metabolic characteristics, and their application for saline–alkali soil improvement in eco-farms. Microorganisms, 12(4), 0676. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12040676
Chen, X., Lewis, S., Heal, K., Lin, Q., & Sohi, S. (2021). Biochar engineering and ageing influence the spatiotemporal dynamics of soil pH in the charosphere. Geoderma, 383, 114919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114919
Chicco, J. M., Mandrone, G., & Vacha, D. (2023). Effects of wildfire on soils: Field studies and modelling on induced underground temperature variations. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, Article 1307569. http://dio.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1307569
Crouzet, O., Consentino, L., Pétraud, J.-P., Marrauld, C., Aguer, J.-P., Bureau, S., Le Bourvellec, C., Touloumet, L., & Bérard, A. (2019). Soil photosynthetic microbial communities mediate aggregate stability: Influence of cropping systems and herbicide use in an agricultural soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 1319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019
Dai, W., Feng, G., Huang, Y., Tewolde, H., Shankle, M., & Jenkins, J. (2024). Cover crops and poultry litter impact on soil structural stability in dryland soybean production in Southeastern United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 88(1), e20676. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20676
Dekker, L. W., & Jungerius, P. D. (1990). Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to the Netherlands. Catena, 17(2), 173–183. http://dio.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50012-6
Edeh, I. G., Joseph, S., Dufresne, A., & Lehmann, J. (2020). A meta-analysis on biochar's effects on soil water properties. Geoderma, 357, 113974. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136857
Edeh, I., Mašek, O., & Buss, W. (2020). A meta-analysis on biochar's effects on soil water properties: New insights and future research challenges. The Science of the Total Environment, 714, 136857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136857
Enders, A., Hanley, K., Whitman, T., Joseph, S., & Lehmann, J. (2012). Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance & agronomic performance. Bioresource Technology, 114, 644-653. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022
Faraji, F., Alijanpour, A., Sheidai Karkaj, E., & Motamedi, J. (2019). Effect of fire and rangeland banqueting on soil carbon sequestration in Atbatan summer rangelands, East Azerbaijan Province. ECOPERSIA, 7(1), 29-37. https://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-18060-fa.html
Fernelius, K.J. Madsen, M.D. Hopkins, B.G. Bansal, Sh. Anderson, V.J. Eggett, D.L. & Roundy, B.A. (2017). https://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-18060-fa.html
Post-fire interactions between soil water repellency, soil fertility & plant growth in soil collected from a burned pińon-juniper woodland. Journal of Arid Environments. 114:98-109. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196317300721
García-Carmona, M., Arcenegui, V., García-Orenes, F., Mataix-Solera, J., (2020). The role of mosses in soil stability, fertility and microbiology six years after a post-fire salvage log ging management. J. Environ. Manag. 262, 110287. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110287
García-Llamas, P., Suárez-Seoane, S., Fernández-Guisuraga, J. M., Fernández-García, V., Fernández-Manso, A., Quintano, C., et al. (2019). Evaluation and comparison of Landsat 8, Sentinel-2 and Deimos-1 remote sensing indices for assessing burn severity in Mediterranean fire-prone ecosystems. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 80, 137–144. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.04.006
Gómez-Rey, M. X., Otero, X. L., & López, R. (2013). Long-term effects of biochar on soil quality & fertility. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 178, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.020
Gross, A., Bromm, T., & Glaser, B. (2021). Soil organic carbon sequestration after biochar application: A global meta-analysis. Agronomy, 11(12), 2474. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122474
Gufwan, L. A., Peng, L., Gufwan, N. M., Lan, S., & Wu, L. (2025). Enhancing soil health through biocrusts: A microbial ecosystem approach for degradation control and restoration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 160, 108–118. http://dio.org/10.1007/s00248-025-02504-5
Heydari Nezhad, A. M. (2023). The effect of green microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus aqueous extract on enzyme production ability of Trichoderma species. MG Genetics, 1(1), 1735. http://mg.genetics.ir/article-1-1735-en.html
Hu, J., Guo, H., Xue, Y., Gao, M.-T., Zhang, S., Tsang, Y. F., Li, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2019). Using a mixture of microalgae, biochar, & organic manure to increase the capacity of soil to act as a carbon sink. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 19(11), 3718–3727. http://dio.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02337-z
International Biochar Initiative. (2015). Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil (Version 2.1). International Biochar Initiative. https://www.biochar-international.org
Kalantari, Z., Ferreira, C. S. S., Pan, H., & Pereira, P. (2023). Nature‑based solutions to global environmental challenges. Science of The Total Environment, 880, Article 163227. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163227
Kasper, M., Buchan, G. D., Mentler, A., & Blum, W. E. H. (2009). Influence of soil tillage systems on aggregate stability and the distribution of C and N in different aggregate fractions. Soil & Tillage Research, 105(1), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.06.010
Khaji, P., Moezzi, A., Enayatizamir, N., Moradi, N., & Karimi, A. (2025). Effects of modified biochars on some biological and chemical properties of calcareous soil. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 56(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2024.384714.669826
Khan, T. F., & Nipu, A. A. M. (2019). Interaction between biochar & algae on problem soil. Journal of Materials Science & Chemical Engineering, 12, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2024.121005
Knorr W, Arneth A, Jiang L (2016) Demographic controls of future global fire risk. Nat Clim Change, 6(8):781–785. http://dio.org/10.1038/nclimate2999
Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability, 7(5), 5875–5895. http://dio.org/10.3390/su7055875
Leong, Y. K., & Chang, J. S. (2023). Microalgae-based biochar production & applications: A comprehensive review. Bioresource Technology, 389, 129782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128515
Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Sohi, S. P., Thies, J. E., O’Neill, B., & Trujillo, L. (2010). Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soils of the western Amazon region. Biogeochemistry, 100(1), 235–246. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.09.007
Li, J., Li, J., Hua, D., Li, S., Pang, Z., & Jiang, H. (2024). Research on the enhancement material and culture method of soil aggregates composed of feldspathic sandstone and sand. Scientific Reports, 14, 67073. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67073-y
Li, K., Yang, H., Han, X., Xue, L., Lv, Y., Li, J., Fu, Z., Li, C., Shen, W., Guo, H., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Fractal features of soil particle size distributions and their potential as an indicator of Robinia pseudoacacia invasion. Scientific Reports, 8, 7075. http://dio.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25543-0
Li, M., Wang, Q., Shen, S., Li, F., & Li, L. (2020). Heterogeneity of soil structure and fertility during desertification of alpine grassland in northwest Sichuan. Ecosphere, 11(11), e03161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3161
Li, Y., Yang, J., Yang, M., Wang, B., & Zhang, F. (2025). Biochar application reduces soil detachment capacity by overland flow under a continuous three-year field experiment on the Loess Plateau of China. International Soil & Water Conservation Research, 13(12), 687–698. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.04.002
Liu, Z., Dugan, B., Masiello, C. A., & Gonnermann, H. M. (2020). Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. PLoS ONE, 15(1), e0227989. http://dio.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179079
Llovet, J., Ruiz-Valera, M., Josa, R., & Vallejo, V. R. (2009). Soil responses to fire in Mediterranean forest landscapes in relation to the previous stage of land abandonment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18(2), 222-232. http://dio.org/10.1071/WF07089
Lopičić, Z., Antanasković, A., Milojković, J., Adamović, V., Mišić, M., Janjićijević, A., & Šoštarić, T. (2025). Physicochemical characterization and stability of biochars intended to be applied as soil amendments. Metallurgical & Materials Engineering Congress of South-East Europe. https://doi.org/10.30544/mmesee54
MacDonald, L.H., Larsen, I., (2009). Effects of forest fires & post-fire rehabilitation: a Colorado, USA case study. In: Cerdá, A., Robichaud, P.R. (Eds.), Fire Effects on Soils & Restoration Strategies. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA, pp. 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439843338-c16
Méndez, A., Terradillos, M., & Gascó, G. (2012). Physicochemical & agronomic properties of biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysed at different temperatures. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 102, 124–130. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.03.006
Mikha, M., Green, T., Untiedt, T., & Hergret, G. (2023). Land management affects soil structural stability: Multi-index principal component analyses of treatment interactions. Soil and Tillage Research, 237, 105890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105890
Muñoz‑Rojas, M., Machado de Lima, N. M., Chamizo, S., & Bowker, M. A. (2021). Restoring post‑fire ecosystems with biocrusts: Living, photosynthetic soil surfaces. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 23, 100273. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100273
Najjar, A. A., Kuhn, A. J., Al-Tardeh, S. M., & Kuchendorf, C. M. (2021). Microalgae & biochar agro-fertilization of the Palestinian Rehan barley cultivar under salinity stress. Agronomy, 11(11), 2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112309
Ngalani, G., Kagho, F., Peguy, N., Prudent, P., Ondo, J., & Ngameni, E. (2022). Effects of coffee husk and cocoa pods biochar on the chemical properties of an acid soil from West Cameroon. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69, 744–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2033733
Ngui, M., Lin, Y., Wei, I., Wang, C., Xu, Y., & Lin, Y. (2024). Effects of the combination of biochar and organic fertilizer on soil properties and agronomic attributes of soybean (Glycine max L.). PLOS ONE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310221
Nguyen, B., Dinh, G., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, D., Vu, T., Tran, H., Van Thai, N., Vu, H., & D., D. (2022). The potential of biochar to ameliorate the major constraints of acidic and salt-affected soils. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 22, 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00736-1
Ning, Y., Han, L., Zhu, Y., & Li, H. (2025). Microalgae enhance the ameliorative effects of organic materials on soil treated by thermal desorption: Soil properties and nutrient cycling. Journal of Environmental Management, 392, 126737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126737
Novak, J. M., Busscher, W. J., Laird, D. L., Ahmedna, M., Watts, D. W., & Niandou, M. A. S. (2009). Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Science, 174(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181981d9a
Osman, A., Fawzy, S., Farghali, M., El-Azazy, M., Elgarahy, A., Fahim, R., Maksoud, M., Ajlan, A., Yousry, M., Saleem, Y., & Rooney, D. (2022). Biochar for agronomy, animal farming, anaerobic digestion, composting, water treatment, soil remediation, construction, energy storage, and carbon sequestration: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20, 2385–2485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x
Pagliai, M., Vignozzi, N., & Pellegrini, S. (2004). Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil & Tillage Research, 79, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.07.002
Prats, S. A., Malvar, M. C., Vieira, D. C. S., MacDonald, L. H., & Keizer, J. J. (2014). Effectiveness of hydromulching to reduce runoff & erosion in a recently burnt pine plantation in central Portugal. Land Degradation & Development, 25(5), 433–444. http://dio.org/10.1002/ldr.2236
Rallo, G., Baiamonte, G., Juárez, J., & Provenzano, G. (2014). Improvement of FAO-56 model to estimate transpiration fluxes of drought tolerant crops under soil water deficit: Application for olive groves. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 140(7), 04014026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000760
Renuka, N., Guldhe, A., Prasanna, R., Singh, P., & Bux, F. (2018). Microalgae as multi-functional options in modern agriculture: Current trends, prospects and challenges. Biotechnology Advances, 36(4), 1255–1273. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.04.004
Rhoades, J. D. (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3—Chemical Methods (pp. 417–435). Soil Science Society of America. http://dio.org/10.2136/msa2015.0039
Robichaud, P.R., Beyers, J.L., Neary, D.G., (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of postfire rehabilitation treatments. GTR 63. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p. 85.
Robinson, D., Thomas, A., Reinsch, S., Lebron, I., Feeney, C., Maskell, L., Wood, C., Seaton, F., Emmett, B., & Cosby, B. (2022). Analytical modelling of soil porosity and bulk density across the soil organic matter and land-use continuum. Scientific Reports. 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11099-7.
Romeo, S., Certini, G., Fernández, C., Santín, C., & De La Rosa, J. M. (2020). Short-term effects of different fire severities on soil properties & Pinus halepensis regeneration. Forest Ecology & Management, 474. http://dio.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00884-2
Sahota, S., Vijay, V. K., Subbarao, P. M. V., Chandra, R., Ghosh, P., Shah, G., Kapoor, R., Vijay, V., Koutu, V., & Thakur, I. S. (2018). Characterization of leaf waste based biochar for cost effective hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas. Bioresource Technology, 250, 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.093
Schjønning, P., Mcbride, R., Keller, T., & Obour, P. (2017). Predicting soil particle density from clay and soil organic matter contents. Geoderma, 286, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.020.
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., ... & Trumbore, S. E. (2011). Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 478(7367), 49–56. http://dio.org/10.1038/nature10386
Scott, D. A., & Page-Dumroese, D. S. (2016). Biochar as a soil amendment: A review of the literature. Forest Ecology & Management, 380, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.008
Shahbazi, K., Marzi, M., Mohammadi, M.H., Asadi, H., Fathi Garlidani, A., Hashemi, Nesb Zavareh, K.S., Toloi, R., Beheshti, M., Avizhgan, A. and Cheraghi, M. (2024). Methods of soil analysis: Sampling, chemical, and physical methods. Soil and Water Research Institute of Iran. ISBN: 978-622-6705-36-3. ISBN: 978-622-6705-36-3
Shang, X.-C., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Hou, X., & Yang, L. (2023). Combinations of waste seaweed liquid fertilizer & biochar on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedling growth in an acid-affected soil of Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, 260, 115075. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115075
Shanthakumar, S., Abinandan, S., Venkateswarlu, K., Subashchandrabose, S., & Megharaj, M. (2020). Algalization of acid soils with acid-tolerant strains: Improvement in pH, carbon content, exopolysaccharides, indole acetic acid and dehydrogenase activity. Land Degradation & Development, 32, 3157–3166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3849
Shojaeizadeh, K., Ahmadi, M., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2023). Spatiotemporal changes of forest fire in vegetation areas of Iran based on MODIS sensor. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 12(36). http://dio.org/10.22111/jneh.2022.41725.1881
Shtober‑Zisu, N., & Wittenberg, L. (2021). Long‑term effects of wildfire on rock weathering and soil stoniness in the Mediterranean landscapes. Science of The Total Environment, 762, 143125. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143125
Singh, H., Northup, B., Rice, C., & Prasad, P. (2022). Biochar applications influence soil physical and chemical properties, microbial diversity, and crop productivity: A meta-analysis. Biochar, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00138-1
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010). A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 105, 47–82. http://dio.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9
Song, X., Liu, J., Feng, Y., Zhou, C., Li, X., Yan, X., Ruan, R., & Cheng, P. (2024). Microalgae-based biofertilizers improve fertility and microbial community structures in the soil of potted tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1461945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1461945
Stoof, C.R. Ferreira, A.J.D. Mol, W. Van den Berg, J. De Kort, A. Drooger, S. Slingerland, E.C. Mansholt, A.U. Ferreira C.S.S. & Ritsema, C.J. (2015). Soil surface changes increase runoff & erosion risk after a low–moderate severity fire. Geoderma. 239– 240: 58–67. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.09.020
Sun, J., Lu, X., Chen, G., Luo, N., Zhang, Q., & Li, X. (2023). Biochar promotes soil aggregate stability and associated organic carbon sequestration and regulates microbial community structures in Mollisols from northeast China. SOIL, 9, 261-275. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-261-2023
Sun, J., Tu, S., Lu, X., & Li, X. (2025). Coupling of Biochar and Manure Improves Soil Carbon Pool Stability, Pore Structure, and Microbial Diversity. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061384.
Šurda, P., Vitková, J., Lichner, Ľ., Botková, N., & Toková, L. (2024, May 22). Effect of wettable and hydrophobic biochar addition on properties of sandy soil. Biologia, 80(5), 1247–1258. http://dio.org/10.1007/s11756-024-01702-9
Su, Z., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, J. (2024). Biochar effects on salt-affected soil properties and plant productivity: A global meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 366, 121653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121653
Tyler, S. W., & Wheatcraft, S. W. (1992). Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: Analysis and limitations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(2), 362–369. http://dio.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00138-1
Úbeda, X., & Bernia, S. (2005). Effects of prescribed fire on soil quality in Mediterranean grassland (Prades Mountains, north-east Spain). International Journal of Wildland Fire, 14(4), 379–384. http://dio.org/10.1071/WF05040
Ursino, N., & Rulli, M. C. (2010). Combined effect of fire & water scarcity on vegetation patterns in arid lands. Ecological Modelling, 221(19), 2353–2362. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.018
Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Wang, Z., Pan, J., Lu, Z., Xia, L., Song, S., Hu, Y., & Li, Y. (2025). Microcoleus vaginatus: A novel amendment for constructing artificial soil from tailings. Environmental Technology & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103939
Wang, Z., Tan, J., Wu, C., Xia, L., & Song, S. (2025). Improving soil properties and microbial communities in copper tailings using montmorillonite-based Chlorella gel beads. Science of the Total Environment, 974, 179232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025
Welden, E. A., Chausson, A., & Melanidis, M. S. (2021). Leveraging nature-based solutions for transformation: Reconnecting people and nature. People and Nature, 3(5), 966–977. http://dio.org/10.1002/pan3.10212
Yi, S., Chang, Y. C., & Imhoff, P. T. (2020). Predicting water retention of biochar enriched soil from independent measurements of biochar and soil properties. Advances in Water Resources, 142, 103638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103638
Zanutel, M., Garré, S., Sanglier, P., & Bielders, C. (2023). Biochar modifies soil physical properties mostly through changes in soil structure rather than through its internal porosity. Vadose Zone Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20301
Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). The influence of microalgae on vegetable production & quality in hydroponic systems. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 1336–1343. http://dio.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118563
Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Soil algae for combating soil degradation: Greenhouse experiment with different soil amendments. Soil Research, 60(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR22074
Zhang Y, Biswas A (2017) The effects of forest fire on soil organic matter & nutrients in boreal forests of North America: a review. Adapt Soil Manage 2017:465–476. http://dio.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3638-5_21
Zhang, Y., Miao, S., Song, Y., Wang, X., & Jin, F. (2024). Biochar Application Reduces Saline–Alkali Stress by Improving Soil Functions and Regulating the Diversity and Abundance of Soil Bacterial Community in Highly Saline–Alkali Paddy Field. Sustainability, 16(3), 1001. http://dio.org/10.3390/su16031001
Zhao, Y., Wu, T., Wang, W., Zhao, L., Liu, J., Jiang, Y., Zhou, W., & Hao, J. (2020). Research on the treatment of soil leachate by using microalgae. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 615, 012113. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/615/1/012113
Zhou, M., Liu, C., Wang, J., Meng, Q., Yuan, Y., Liu, X., Zhu, Y., Ding, G., Zhang, J., Zeng, X., & Du, W. (2020). Soil aggregates stability and storage of soil organic carbon respond to cropping systems on Black Soils of Northeast China. Scientific Reports, 10, 10991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57193-1