Sensitivity Analysis of Several Potential Evapotranspiration Equations to Climatic Variables in the Basetime and Future Periods Using the Sobol Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture-University of Tehran -Karaj-Iran

2 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering-Faculty of Agriculture- University of Tehran-Karaj-Iran

Abstract

Due to complexity of the evapotranspiration process and the interactive effects of climatic variables, conducting sensitivity analysis is essential for identifying the most influencing parameters and reducing uncertainties in ETp estimation models. Sensitivity analysis is particularly important under climate change conditions, as it provides insights into how ETp responds to variations in temperature, radiation, humidity, and wind speed. This study evaluates the sensitivity of (ETp) to mean, minimum, and maximum temperature, wind speed, net radiation, and relative humidity across eight selected stations in Iran during the baseline (2001–2024) and the future (2025–2100) period. The global Sobol sensitivity analysis method, based on variance decomposition, was applied to quantify both the individual and interaction effects of input parameters on model outputs. Baseline climate data were obtained from IRIMO and Future climatic data were obtained from the CNRM-ESM2-1 and INM-CM5-0 climate models under the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios of CMIP6. ETp was calculated using three methods FAO-56 Penman–Monteith, Romanenko and Thom-Oliver using the PyET package. Results indicated that Tmax and RH are the most influential variables in most stations. In the future period, the influence of temperature-related variables increases, while the role of radiation and wind decreases, confirming global warming and the reduction in atmospheric humidity effects on ET. A shift from radiation-dominated to temperature-dominated control was observed in humid northern regions, whereas increased sensitivity to relative humidity and mean temperature was evident in central arid regions. These findings suggest that revising water management strategies as a result of altered energy–moisture balance is essential,

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Potential evapotranspiration (ETP) represents a key component of the hydrological cycle and is a major determinant in water resource management, irrigation planning, and climate impact assessments. Accurate estimation of ETP requires understanding its dependence on multiple meteorological variables such as air temperature, humidity, wind speed, and net radiation. However, these variables interact in complex and nonlinear ways, resulting in uncertainty in ETP estimation, especially under changing climate conditions. Sensitivity analysis is therefore an essential tool to identify which input parameters exert the greatest influence on ETP, allowing researchers to prioritize data accuracy and model calibration efforts. Among global sensitivity analysis methods, the Sobol variance-based approach is one of the most robust techniques, as it quantifies both the individual and interaction effects of input variables on model outputs (Sobol, 2001; Saltelli et al., 2010). This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of several ETP equations to key climatic parameters across Iran’s diverse climatic zones using the Sobol method. Three empirical and physically based ETP models FAO-56 Penman–Monteith, Romanenko, and Thom-Oliver were applied to assess and compare parameter sensitivities during a historical baseline period (2001–2024) and a projected future period (2025–2100) under climate change scenarios derived from CMIP6 global climate models.

Method

Meteorological data for the baseline period, including mean, minimum, and maximum temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and shortwave and longwave radiation components, were obtained from the NASA POWER database with a monthly temporal resolution. Future climate data (2025–2100) were extracted from two CMIP6 models CNRM-ESM2-1 and INM-CM5-0 under two shared socioeconomic pathways, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5, from the Copernicus Climate Data Store. Eight representative meteorological stations were selected to capture the climatic diversity of Iran, including Sari, Tehran, Kermanshah, Tabriz, Mashhad, Kerman, Ahvaz, and Bandar Abbas. These stations represent a broad range of climatic conditions, from humid coastal zones in the north to arid and semi-arid environments in the central and southern regions.

The ETP was computed using three different models available in the open-source Python package PyET (Vremec et al., 2024):

1- FAO-56 Penman–Monteith, a physically based method recommended by FAO for semi-arid regions;

2- Romanenko, an empirical temperature–humidity model suitable for data-scarce and dry environments;

3-Thom–Oliver, which emphasizes the role of net radiation and energy balance, making it suitable for humid and coastal areas.

Sensitivity indices were computed using the Sobol method implemented in the Python libraries SALib and NumPy. The Sobol first-order index (Si) quantifies the direct effect of each variable on ETP, while the total-order index () includes all interaction effects among variables. These indices were calculated for each ETP model, climate scenario, and time period to capture how the importance of meteorological drivers may evolve under climate change.

Results

The Sobol sensitivity analysis highlighted significant spatial and temporal differences in how climatic variables affect potential evapotranspiration (ETP) across Iran. During the baseline period, ETP in humid and coastal regions (e.g., Bandar Abbas and Sari) was mainly controlled by net radiation, reflecting high energy inputs, while in arid and continental areas (e.g., Kerman, Mashhad, Ahvaz), maximum temperature and relative humidity were the dominant factors. Mountainous regions (Kermanshah, Tabriz) showed sensitivity to both net radiation and maximum temperature due to solar exposure and large diurnal temperature ranges.

In future periods, ETP became more sensitive to thermal variables, with temperature-driven vapor pressure deficits increasingly dominating over radiation and wind contributions. Humidity gained importance in arid regions, highlighting the role of atmospheric dryness in ETP increases, while in coastal areas, temperature and wind effects slightly intensified due to land–sea thermal contrasts. Mountain stations exhibited reduced sensitivity to minimum temperature, reflecting smaller diurnal temperature variations under warmer nights. Humid northern stations shifted from radiation- to temperature-dominated control, indicating thermal forcing increasingly shapes surface energy balance.

Overall, maximum temperature and relative humidity were the most influential variables historically and in future scenarios, with net radiation and wind playing secondary roles. The findings underscore that local factors such as elevation, proximity to water, and surface characteristics modulate ETP sensitivity, stressing the need for regional assessments. These results align with global studies showing enhanced ETP sensitivity to temperature and humidity under climate change, while emphasizing spatial variability across Iran.

Conclusions
The Sobol sensitivity analysis provided a comprehensive quantitative framework for evaluating how different meteorological variables influence ETP under current and future climate conditions in Iran. The results confirm that future ETP dynamics are likely to be governed by enhanced temperature sensitivity and increased atmospheric dryness, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Conversely, in humid regions, the controlling mechanisms may shift from radiative to thermal dominance. The observed inter-station variability revealed the necessity of considering local climatic characteristics when modeling evapotranspiration across Iran’s diverse environments. The combination of three selected ETP models Penman-Monteith, Romanenko, and Thom-Oliver allowed for a robust assessment of both energy-driven and humidity-driven processes. Furthermore, this study highlights the relatively limited application of global sensitivity analysis techniques such as Sobol in Iranian hydrological studies and demonstrates their potential for improving ETP modeling accuracy. In summary, climate change is expected to intensify thermal controls on evapotranspiration while diminishing the influence of radiation and wind, reshaping the surface energy balance and water demand across Iran. The findings of this research can aid in refining evapotranspiration models, improving irrigation planning, and guiding adaptation strategies for sustainable water management under future climatic conditions.

Author Contributions

M.V.: Data Analysis, programming, results synthesis, draft preparation

N.G.: Visualization, Supervision, Manuscript editing, Conceptualization, Methodology

Data Availability Statement

No datasets are available

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the University of Tehran for the logistical supports and Iran Meteorological Organization for providing required data.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of ABCD (Ethical code: IR.UT.RES.2024.500). The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Diop, S., Durand, J.-L., Morand, S., & Alimi, F. (2023). Four‑component net radiometers to quantify albedo and heat fluxes in conservation agriculture. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4, 678. doi: 10.1038/s43017‑023‑00432‑x.
Djaman, K., Irmak, S., & Rathje, W. R. (2015). Comparison of the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith and other evaporation estimation methods under limited data conditions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 141(3), 04014068.
Herman, J. D., Kollat, J. B., Reed, P. M., & Wagener, T. (2013). Technical note: Method of Morris effectively reduces the computational demands of global sensitivity analysis for distributed watershed models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(12), 5109–5125. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2893-2013, 2013.
Iooss, B., & Lemaître, P. (2015). Sobol’ sensitivity analysis: A tool to guide the development and use of models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 67, 1–13.
Manzo, L., & Trishchenko, A. (2025). Improved representations of longwave surface emissivity to better estimate surface radiation fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130.
McMahon, T. A., Peel, M. C., Lowe, L., Srikanthan, R., & McVicar, T. R. (2013). Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: A pragmatic synthesis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(4), 1331-1363. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013.
McVicar, T. R., Roderick, M. L., Donohue, R. J., Li, L. T., Van Niel, T. G., Thomas, A., Grieser, J., Jhajharia, D., Himri, Y., Mahowald, N. M., Mescherskaya, A. V., Kruger, A. C., & Dinpashoh, Y. (2012). Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: Implications for evaporation. Journal of Hydrology, 416–417, 182–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024.
Phan Thi Ha, Le Van Trung, Nguyen Thi Thu Ha, Nguyen Thanh Long, & Hoang Thi Thu Hang. (2023). Trends of reference evapotranspiration and their sensitivity to meteorological parameters in Southeastern Vietnam using improved Sen trend analysis and Sobol method. Earth Science Informatics, 17, 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01176-4.
Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J. W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D. B., & Wagener, T. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79, 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008.
Razavi, S., & Gupta, H. V. (2016). A new framework for comprehensive, robust, and efficient global sensitivity analysis: 1. Theory. Water Resources Research, 52(1), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017558.
Raziei, T., Saghafian, B., Paulo, A. A., Pereira, L. S., & Bordi, I. (2009). Spatial patterns and temporal variability of drought in Western Iran. Water Resources Management, 23(3), 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269‑008‑9282‑4.
Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Crespo Cuaresma, J., K.C., S., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., Ebi, K., … Tavoni, M. (2017). The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153‑168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.009.
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., & Tarantola, S. (2010). Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Computer Physics Communications, 181(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., & Ratto, M. (2008). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/0470870958
Scheff, J., & Frierson, D. M. W. (2014). Scaling potential evapotranspiration with greenhouse warming. Journal of Climate, 27(4), 1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00233.1.
Sobol, I. M. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1-3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6.
Sobol’, I. M. (1993). Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiments, 1(4), 407–414.
Tabari, H., & Hosseinzadehtalaei, P. (2011). Analysis of trends in temperature data in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Global and Planetary Change, 79(1–2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.07.008.
Vautard, R., Cattiaux, J., Yiou, P., Thépaut, J.-N., & Ciais, P. (2010). Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nature Geoscience, 3(11), 756-761. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo979.
Verma, M., Fisher, J. B., Mallick, K., Ryu, Y., Kobayashi, H., Guillaume, A., Moore, G., Ramakrishnan, L., Hendrix, V., Wolf, S., Sikka, M., Kiely, G., Wohlfahrt, G., Gielen, B., Roupsard, O., Toscano, P., Arain, A., & Cescatti, A. (2016). Global Surface Net‑Radiation at 5 km from MODIS Terra. Remote Sensing, 8(9), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090739
Vremec, M., Collenteur, R. A., & Birk, S. (2024). PyEt v1.3.1: A Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration. Geoscientific Model Development, 17(18), 7083–7103. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024.
Xu, C. Y., & Singh, V. P. (2005). Evaluation of three complementary relationship evapotranspiration models by water balance approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration in different climatic regions. Journal of Hydrology, 308(1–4), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.024.
Yahyavi Dizaj, A., Akbari Azirani, T., Khaledi, Sh., & Javan, Kh. (2023). Seasonal analysis of reference evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to meteorological elements in Iran. Journal of Water and Soil (Ab va Khak), 37(4), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2023.83328.1307.
Yang, Y., Roderick, M. L., Zhang, S., McVicar, T. R., & Donohue, R. J. (2019). Hydrologic implications of vegetation response to elevated CO₂ in climate projections. Nature Climate Change, 9(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0361-0.
Zeng, P., Sun, F., Liu, Y., & Feng, Y. (2021). Changes of potential evapotranspiration and its sensitivity across China under future climate scenarios. Atmospheric Research, Article 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105763.