Prediction of saturated hydraulic conductivity with pedotransfer functions for Sistan Plain soils

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

Abstract

One of the important parameters in the evaluation of soil hydrological properties is saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), which plays an important role in modeling flow and solute transport in soil. Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) relate Ksat to readily available soil properties such as particle size distribution, bulk density, and organic matter, and have been widely developed due to their simplicity and high efficiency. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of twenty-three PTFs in predicting Ksat for 100 samples of Sistan soils. These functions were divided into three groups A, B, and C based on the input components. The results showed that when effective porosity is the only available data (Group A), the PTFs developed by Suleiman et al. (2001) and Ahuja et al. (1989) are the best models. If particle size distribution, bulk density, and porosity data are available (Group B), the PTFs developed by Cosby et al. (1984) and Ottoni et al. (2019) are the most accurate models. Among the PTFs that require organic matter in addition to particle size distribution and bulk density (Group C), the functions of Zuo and He (2021) and Wosten et al. (2001) showed the highest performance. Finally, if the availability of input data is not a limiting factor, the most accurate PTFs are those developed by Cosby et al. (1984), Zuo and He (2021), Ottoni et al. (2019), Wosten et al. (2001), respectively. The results can be used to predict Ksat in hydrological modeling for the study area.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Accurate prediction of soil processes usually requires accurate measurements of soil hydraulic properties. Determination of the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is required for many studies related to irrigation, drainage, water movement, and solute transport in soils. Ksat can be obtained through direct laboratory or field measurements, however, in many cases, its direct measurement is time-consuming and laborious. On the other hand, Ksat can be estimated based on readily available soil properties such as texture, particle size distribution, bulk density, porosity, and organic matter content. This alternative indirect method is called soil pedotransfer functions (PTF). PTFs are regression-based models that use available information to provide estimates of other relevant factors and have attracted the attention of soil researchers mainly due to their simplicity and relatively high efficiency. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the performance of 23 PTFs using readily available soil parameters to predict Ksat in the Sistan Plain. In order to determine the best PTF that is appropriate for the conditions of the study area, 100 soil samples from the Sistan region were used.

Method

In order to conduct this research, first, the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil was measured using the inverted well method at 100 points in the Sistan Plain.

Twenty-three PTFs were classified into three groups based on their required inputs. Group 1: This group of PTFs is an empirical relationship between Ksat and effective porosity. Seven functions from this group were evaluated in this study. Group 2: This group of PTFs requires more inputs than Group 1. The functions in this group predict Ksat based on particle size distribution (percentage of sand, silt, and clay), bulk density, and total porosity. Eight functions from this group were evaluated in this study. Group 3: This group of PTFs requires input components including particle size distribution, bulk density, and organic matter content. Eight functions from this group were evaluated in this study. Finally, logarithmic transformations were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Among the group 1 functions, the F3 model, which is the function developed by Suleiman et al. (2001), has the closest predictions to the measured values (GMER=1.15), followed by the Ahuja et al. (1989) model, F7, with a GMER of 1.50. Among the functions in Group 2, the F11 function (Cosby et al., 1984) is the closest to the measured values, with a slight difference. The Ottoni et al. (2019) function (F15), which is one of the most recent functions presented by soil researchers in the world, ranked second. The Saxton et al. (1986) (F13) and Brakensiek et al. (1984) (F12) functions also ranked third and fourth, respectively. Among the functions in Group 3, the functions F23, F18 and F21 have the best performance in this group. The Zuo and He (2021) function (F23), which is one of the most recent functions presented by soil researchers in this group, provides the most accurate Ksat predictions for the soils under study. Finally, the performance of the twenty-three functions examined in this study was examined. The results indicated that the Cosby et al. (1984) function, although it uses only two components of sand and clay percentage, has the highest performance. With a slight difference, the functions of Zuo and He (2021), Ottoni et al. (2019), Wosten et al. (2001) and Saxton et al. (1986) and in the next rank, the functions of Brakensiek et al. (1984) and Suleiman et al. (2001) also provided the highest performance among the three groups.

Conclusions

In this study, twenty-three PTFs were evaluated for Ksat prediction in the Sistan region. The results of this study showed that some of the new functions presented in this field can also provide good performance compared to the basic functions in predicting Ksat. Given that factors such as soil structure have received less attention in the development of PTFs, the accuracy of PTFs varies for different regions and their performance is not affected by the number of their input components. The results presented in this study can be used to predict Ksat in the study area, using the soil transfer function technique as an input parameter in various modeling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.K.; methodology, P.K.; software, P.K.; validation, P.K.; formal analysis, P.K.; investigation, P.K.; resources, P.K.; data curation, P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.K.; writing review and editing, P.K; visualization, P.K; supervision, P.K; project administration, P.K; funding acquisition, P.K. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on reasonable request from the author.

Acknowledgements

The author wish to acknowledge the support from the University of Zabol, Iran for providing the financial support for this research project.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct. 

Abdelbaki, A. M., Youssef, M. A., Naguib, E. M., Kiwan, M. E., & El-giddawy, E. I. (2009). Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity for US soils. In 2009 Reno, Nevada, June 21-June 24, 2009 (p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Ahuja, L. R., Naney, J. W., Green, R. E., & Nielsen, D. R. (1984). Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48(4), 699-702.
Amundson, R., Berhe, A. A., Hopmans, J. W., Olson, C., Sztein, A.E., & Sparks, D. L. (20150. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science, 348(6235), 1261071.
Behmanesh, J., Rezaei Abajelu, E., Mohammadnejhad, B., Zeinalzadeh, K., & Habibzadeh Azar, B. (2015). Evaluation of pedo-Transfer functions for estimating soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Case study: Urmia Plain). Water and Soil Science, 25(2), 1-12. (In Persian)
Bittelli, M., Campbell, G. S., & Tomei, F. (2015). Soil physics with Python: transport in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Oxford University Press, New York, USA
Blake, G. R., & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 5, 363-375.
Bouma, J. (1989). Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Advances in Soil Science, 9, 177–213.
Brakensiek, D. L., Rawls, W. J., & Stephenson, G. R. (1984). Modifying SCS hydrologic soil groups and curve numbers for rangeland soils. ASAE Paper (PNR-84203).
Chari, M. M. (2021). Predicting bulk density using pedotransfer functions for soils in Sistan plain. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 10(4), 137-154. (In Persian)
Cleveland, C. C., Houlton, B. Z., Smith, W. K., Marklein, A. R., Reed, S. C., Parton, W., Del Grosso, S. J., & Running, S. W. (2013). Patterns of new versus recycled primary production in the terrestrial biosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(31), 12733-12737.
Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., & Ginn, T. (1984). A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water resources research20(6), 682-690.
Dai, Y., Shangguan, W., Duan, Q., Liu, B., Fu, S., & Niu, G. (2013). Development of a China dataset of soil hydraulic parameters using pedotransfer functions for land surface modeling. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14(3), 869-887.
Dane, J. H., & Puckett, W. (1994). Field soil hydraulic properties based on physical and mineralogical information. In Proceedings of the international workshop on indirect methods for estimating the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils (pp. 389-403). Riverside: University of California.
Forrest, J. A., Beatty, J., Hignett, C. T., Pickering, J., & Williams, R. G. P. (1985). A survey of the physical properties of wheatland soils in eastern Australia. CSIRO Australia Division of Soils, Divisional Report No. 78.
Gee, G. W., & Or, D. (2002). Particle‐size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 4 physical methods5, 255-293.
Ghanbarian, B., Taslimitehrani, V., & Pachepsky, Y. A. (2017). Accuracy of sample dimension-dependent pedotransfer functions in estimation of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. Catena, 149, 374-380.
Jabro, J. D. (1992). Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data. Transactions of the ASAE35(2), 557-560.
Julia, M. F., Monreal, T. E., del Corral Jimenez, A. S., & Melendez, E. G. (2004). Constructing a saturated hydraulic conductivity map of Spain using pedotransfer functions and spatial prediction. Geoderma, 123(3-4), 257-277.
Katul, G. G., Oren, R., Manzoni, S., Higgins, C., & Parlange, M. B. (2012). Evapotranspiration: A process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil‐plant‐atmosphere‐climate system. Reviews of Geophysics, 50(3).
Kelishadi, H., Mosaddeghi, M. R., Hajabbasi, M. A., & Ayoubi, S. (2014). Evaluating and developing pedotransfer functions to predict soil saturated hydraulic conductivity at landscape scale in central Zagros. Applied Soil Research, 1(2), 16-33. (In Persian)
Khatti, J., & Grover, K. S. (2024). Assessment of hydraulic conductivity of compacted clayey soil using artificial neural network: An investigation on structural and database multicollinearity. Earth Science Informatics, 17(4), 3287-3332.
Li, Y., Chen, D., White, R. E., Zhu, A., & Zhang, J. (2007). Estimating soil hydraulic properties of Fengqiu County soils in the North China Plain using pedotransfer functions. Geoderma, 138(3-4), 261-271.
Minasny, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2000). Evaluation and development of hydraulic conductivity pedotransfer functions for Australian soil. Soil Research38(4), 905-926.
Montzka, C., Herbst, M., Weihermüller, L., Verhoef, A., & Vereecken, H. (2017). A global data set of soil hydraulic properties and sub-grid variability of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves. Earth System Science Data, 9(2), 529-543.
Oki, T., & Kanae, S. (2006). Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. science, 313(5790), 1068-1072.
Ottoni, M. V., Ottoni Filho, T. B., Lopes-Assad, M. L. R., & Rotunno Filho, O. C. (2019). Pedotransfer functions for saturated hydraulic conductivity using a database with temperate and tropical climate soils. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 1345-1358.
Puckett, W. E., Dane, J. H., & Hajek, B. F. (1985). Physical and mineralogical data to determine soil hydraulic properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal49(4), 831-836.
Qin, L., Tian, Z., Lin, L., Yi, C., & Chen, J. (2024). Evaluation and development of pedotransfer functions of saturated hydraulic conductivity for subtropical soils. Geoderma, 448, 116976.
Saxton, K. E., Rawls, W., Romberger, J. S., & Papendick, R. I. (1986). Estimating generalized soil‐water characteristics from texture. Soil science society of America Journal50(4), 1031-1036.
Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., & Van Genuchten, M. T. (2001). Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of hydrology, 251(3-4), 163-176.
Sorkheh Nejad, M., Albaji, M., Naseri, A. A., & Boroomand Nasab, S. (2023). Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil surface layer by combining transfer functions and remote sensing (Case Study: South of Ahwaz Lands). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 54(1), 105- 122. (In Persian)
Spychalski, M., Kaźmierowski, C., & Kaczmarek, Z. (2007). Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity on the basis of drainage porosity. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities10(1), 04.
Suleiman, A. A., & Ritchie, J. T. (2001). Estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity from soil porosity. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 44(2), 235-339.
Tietje, O., & Hennings, V. (1996). Accuracy of the saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction by pedotransfer functions compared to the variability within FAO textural classes. Geoderma69(1-2), 71-84.
USDA, N. (1999). United States department of agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Plants Database.
Vereecken, H., Maes, J., & Feyen, J. (1990). Estimating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from easily measured soil properties. Soil Science149(1), 1-12.
Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J. W., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., ... & Young, I. M. (2016). Modeling soil processes: Review, key challenges, and new perspectives. Vadose zone journal15(5), 1-57.
Vereecken, H., Weynants, M., Javaux, M., Pachepsky, Y., Schaap, M. G., & Genuchten, M. T. V. (2010). Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: A review. Vadose Zone Journal, 9(4), 795-820.
Vinhal-Freitas, I. C., Corrêa, G. F., Wendling, B., Bobulska, L., & Ferreira, A. S. (2017). Soil textural class plays a major role in evaluating the effects of land use on soil quality indicators. Ecological indicators, 74, 182-190.
Wagner, B., Tarnawski, V. R., Hennings, V., Müller, U., Wessolek, G., & Plagge, R. (2001). Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma, 102(3-4), 275-297.
Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science37(1), 29-38.
Warrick, A. W. (2003). Soil water dynamics. Oxford University Press. USA.
Weynants, M., Vereecken, H., & Javaux, M. (2009). Revisiting Vereecken pedotransfer functions: Introducing a closed-form hydraulic model. Vadose Zone Journal8(1), 86-95.
Wösten, J. H. M., Lilly, A., Nemes, A., & Le Bas, C. L. (1999). Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma90(3-4), 169-185.
Wösten, J. H. M., Pachepsky, Y. A., & Rawls, W. J. (2001). Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. Journal of hydrology, 251(3-4), 123-150.
Xia, Y., & Li, N. (2024). High-Resolution Estimation of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity via Upscaling and Karhunen–Loève Expansion within DREAM (ZS). Applied Sciences, 14(11), 4521.
Zare Abyaneh, H., Soleimani, A., Jalili, S., & Jovzi, M. (2023). Comparison of Methods for Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil in Palmetum Lands. Journal of Irrigation and Water engineering, 13(52), 183-193. (In Persian)
Zarrinfar, S., Ghahraman, B., & Davary, K. (2011). Development of Some pedotransfer functions to predict the saturated hydraulic conductivity of gravel soils using partial least square regression method. Journal of Water and Soil, 25(3), 617-624. (In Persian)
Zuo, Y., & He, K. (2021). Evaluation and development of pedotransfer functions for predicting soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the Alpine Frigid Hilly region of Qinghai Province. Agronomy11(8), 1581.