The Impact of Microplastic on Selected Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983969411 Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University.

3 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham,

Abstract

The use of plastics has become highly prevalent in modern human life, making their elimination nearly impossible. Plastics break down into smaller microplastics particles due to environmental factors, eventually entering the soil. Microplastics alter the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. In this study, the effects of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microplastics on certain physicochemical properties of soil were investigated in rangeland and agricultural lands within the Nahrmian watershed. Experimental plots were constructed, and PET microplastics smaller than 500 micrometers were added to the soil. Three stages of irrigation and tillage were conducted in agricultural plots, while three rainfall events and three tillage stages were performed in rangeland plots. Parameters such as clay, silt, and sand percentages, pH, sodium (Na), potassium (K), electrical conductivity (EC), and organic carbon (OC) were measured before and after the addition of microplastic particles and throughout the irrigation, rainfall, and surface tillage processes. In the rangeland plots, after the introduction of microplastics into the soil, all chemical properties examined except for pH showed non-significant increases. Clay content increased by 2%, and silt content increased by 0.19%, while sand content decreased by 6.04%. In agricultural plots, pH (t-value = 4.3, p = 0.002) and K (t-value = 5.9, p = 0.001) increased significantly, whereas Na and OC showed non-significant increases, and EC decreased. The percentage of soil clay (t-value = 3.99, p = 0.003) decreased significantly, while silt (t-value = 2.33, p = 0.042) and sand (t-value = 4.93, p = 0.001) percentages increased significantly. Due to the flood irrigation method used in agricultural plots, most changes in soil texture were attributed to surface erosion, and the addition of PET microplastics did not result in significant alterations in soil texture. This was further supported by the lack of significant changes in soil texture in rangeland plots. Therefore, the effects of microplastics on soil texture require more extensive research. However, the introduction of microplastics into soil affects its chemical properties over time, with the extent of these effects varying based on land use type and specific soil conditions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction:

Plastics are present in the environment in three primary size categories: macro, meso, and micro. Microplastics (MPs) primarily enter the environment through two pathways: as primary MPs, which are intentionally manufactured for use in products such as cosmetics, and as secondary MPs, which result from the degradation of larger plastic items due to environmental factors like ultraviolet (UV) radiation, water, and wind erosion. Beyond aquatic environments such as oceans and lakes, soil serves as a significant repository for MPs. The composition and properties of microplastics can vary widely, influencing their interaction with the soil environment. The accumulation of MPs in soil has substantial implications for its physical and chemical characteristics, impacting soil quality and functioning either directly or indirectly. The investigation of the effect of MPs on the physicochemical characteristics of soil is primarily conducted in laboratory and pilot-scale environments, with few studies performed at the field or landscape scale. Additionally, there is limited research on this issue across different land uses. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is one of the materials used in the production of agricultural irrigation pipes and other products such as Disposable plastic containers. As a result, this MPs has entered agricultural soils and bareland. In this research, we examine the effects of PET on several key soil characteristics. This study investigates the impact of PET MPs on some soil properties, including Percentage of clay, silt and sand, OC, Na, K, EC, and pH, within two rangeland uses and agricultural land.

Data and research method:

Two types of land, rangelands and agricultural, were selected for the study, and a pair of test plots were established in each land type. A total of 3000 grams of MPs was evenly distributed across the surface of one of two available plots in both the rangelands and agricultural areas. The MPs were thoroughly mixed with the soil to a depth of 0–10 cm using a manual chaser. One plot in each land type (rangelands and agricultural) was designated as a control plot, with no MPs. After the establishment of the rangeland’s plots, 12 samples of 200 grams were collected from the surface of the plots, at a depth of 0–10 cm. The agricultural plots were irrigated biweekly for a period of 8 weeks. Upon completion of the irrigation period, 12 samples, each weighing 200 grams, were taken from the surface of the plots at a depth of 0–10 cm. In the laboratory, the concentrations of K, Na, EC, OC, and soil pH were analyzed. Additionally, soil texture was determined using the hydrometric method, and the percentages of clay, silt, and sand in the soil were calculated. A t-test was used to check the correlation and relationships between the investigated parameters.

Results:

In the rangeland’s plots, after the test period concluded, the average levels of Na, K, OC, and EC of the soil increased, while the soil acidity slightly decreased. These changes were not statistically significant. Additionally, the clay content increased slightly, whereas the amount of silt did not change but the amount of sand decreased slightly. In the agricultural plots, the levels of Na and OC in the soil increased, while the EC decreased. However, these changes were not statistically significant. On the other hand, both pH and K showed a significant increase. The percentage of clay decreased significantly, while the percentage of sand and silt increased significantly. This is despite the fact that no significant changes were observed in the physical and chemical properties of the soil in the control plots on range land pliots, despite the processes of plowing and irrigation. Therefore, the type of land use, soil type, and the duration of the presence of microplastics in the soil are effective in the extent of the effect of microplastics on the physicochemical properties of the soil.

Conclusion:

Based on the findings from previous and current research on the effects of various microplastics on soil physicochemical properties, it is recommended that further studies be conducted to examine the impact of commonly used microplastics, such as light and heavy polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics such as polylactic acid, on essential soil elements like phosphorus and nitrogen. These investigations should be carried out in multiple agricultural fields subjected to different irrigation methods, to better understand the comprehensive influence of microplastics on soil quality under varied management practices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.N. and R.D.; methodology, K.N. and A.S.; software, A.S.; validation, K.N., A.S. and R.D.; formal analysis, A.S.; investigation, K.N., A.S. and R.D.; resources, K.N.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, K.N. and A.S.; visualization, K.N., A.S. and R.D.; supervision, K.N.; project administration, K.N.; funding acquisition, K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on reasonable request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of Grant number 600.871 funded by the research council of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Ascott, M. J., Gooddy, D. C., Wang, L., Stuart, M. E., Lewis, M. A., Ward, R. S., & Binley, A. M. (2017). Global patterns of nitrate storage in the vadose zone. Nature Communications8(1), 1416.
Bagrifam, Saba, Delavar, Mohammad Amir, Keshavarz, Peyman, & Karimi. (2021). A review of soil carbon measurement methods: experimental considerations, advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 10(4), 1-30.‎
Boots, B., Russell, C. W., & Green, D. S. (2019). Effects of microplastics in soil ecosystems: above and below ground. Environmental science & technology53(19), 11496-11506.
Bouma, J. (1991). Influence of soil macroporosity on environmental quality. Advances in agronomy46, 1-37.Carter, M. R., & Gregorich, E. G. (2007). Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC press.
Carter, M. R., & Gregorich, E. G. (2007). Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC press.
Chen, W. F., Zhang, W. M., & Meng, J. (2014). Biochar and agro-ecological environment: review and prospect. Journal of Agro-Environment Science33(5), 821-828.
Cheng Y, Guo Y, Wang F, Zhang L. Effects of polyethylene microplastics stress on soil physicochemical properties mediated by earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(8):12071-12082. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32007-8. Epub 2024 Jan 16. PMID: 38227261.
Chia, R. W., Lee, J. Y., Jang, J., Kim, H., & Kwon, K. D. (2022). Soil health and microplastics: a review of the impacts of microplastic contamination on soil properties. Journal of Soils and Sediments22(10), 2690-2705.
de Souza Machado, A. A., Lau, C. W., Kloas, W., Bergmann, J., Bachelier, J. B., Faltin, E., ... & Rillig, M. C. (2019). Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance. Environmental science & technology, 53(10), 6044-6052.
Feng, X., Wang, Q., Sun, Y., Zhang, S., & Wang, F. (2022). Microplastics change soil properties, heavy metal availability and bacterial community in a Pb-Zn-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous materials424, 127364.
Fotopoulou, K. N., & Karapanagioti, H. K. (2012). Surface properties of beached plastic pellets. Marine environmental research81, 70-77.
Hanif, M. N., Aijaz, N., Azam, K., Akhtar, M., Laftah, W. A., Babur, M., ... & Benitez, I. B. (2024). Impact of microplastics on soil (physical and chemical) properties, soil biological properties/soil biota, and response of plants to it: a review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1-42.
Higashida, S., & Takao, K. (1986). Relations between soil microbial activity and soil properties in grassland. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition32(4), 587-597.
Ingraffia, R., Amato, G., Bagarello, V., Carollo, F. G., Giambalvo, D., Iovino, M., ... & Frenda, A. S. (2021). Polyester microplastic fibers affect soil physical properties and erosion as a function of soil type. Soil Discussions2021, 1-22.
Ingraffia, R., Amato, G., Iovino, M., Rillig, M. C., Giambalvo, D., & Frenda, A. S. (2022). Polyester microplastic fibers in soil increase nitrogen loss via leaching and decrease plant biomass production and N uptake. Environmental Research Letters17(5), 054012.
Kroetsch, D., & Wang, C. (2008). Particle size distribution. Soil sampling and methods of analysis2, 713-725.
Larue, C., Sarret, G., Castillo‐Michel, H., & Pradas del Real, A. E. (2021). A critical review on the impacts of nanoplastics and microplastics on aquatic and terrestrial photosynthetic organisms. Small17(20), 2005834.
Liang, Y., Lehmann, A., Yang, G., Leifheit, E. F., & Rillig, M. C. (2021). Effects of microplastic fibers on soil aggregation and enzyme activities are organic matter dependent. Frontiers in Environmental Science9, 650155.
Liu, H., Yang, X., Liu, G., Liang, C., Xue, S., Chen, H., ... & Geissen, V. (2017). Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil. Chemosphere185, 907-917.
Lozano, Y. M., Aguilar‐Trigueros, C. A., Onandia, G., Maaß, S., Zhao, T., & Rillig, M. C. (2021). Effects of microplastics and drought on soil ecosystem functions and multifunctionality. Journal of Applied Ecology58(5), 988-996.
Lozano, Y. M., Lehnert, T., Linck, L. T., Lehmann, A., & Rillig, M. C. (2021). Microplastic shape, polymer type, and concentration affect soil properties and plant biomass. Frontiers in plant science12, 616645.
Machado, A. A. S. W. kloAS, c. zArFl, S. heMPel, & M. c. rillig. 2018. Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 24, 1405-1416.
Mondol, M., Angon, P. B., & Roy, A. (2024). Effects of microplastics on soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Natural Hazards Research.
Nosrati, K. (2013). Assessing soil quality indicator under different land use and soil erosion using multivariate statistical techniques. Environmental monitoring and assessment185, 2895-2907.
Qi, Y., Ossowicki, A., Yang, X., Lwanga, E. H., Dini-Andreote, F., Geissen, V., & Garbeva, P. (2020). Effects of plastic mulch film residues on wheat rhizosphere and soil properties. Journal of Hazardous Materials387, 121711.
Qian, H., Zhang, M., Liu, G., Lu, T., Qu, Q., Du, B., & Pan, X. (2018). Effects of soil residual plastic film on soil microbial community structure and fertility. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution229, 1-11.
Qiu Y, Zhou S, Zhang C, Zhou Y, Qin W. Soil microplastic characteristics and the effects on soil properties and biota: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2022 Nov 15; 313:120183. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120183. Epub 2022 Sep 17. PMID: 36126769.
Renard, K. G. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
Rillig, M. C., & Lehmann, A. (2020). Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems. Science368(6498), 1430-1431.
Rillig, M. C., de Souza Machado, A. A., Lehmann, A., & Klümper, U. (2018). Evolutionary implications of microplastics for soil biota. Environmental Chemistry, 16(1), 3-7.
Rillig, M. C., Lehmann, A., de Souza Machado, A. A., & Yang, G. (2019). Microplastic effects on plants. New phytologist, 223(3), 1066-1070.
Shi, J., Wang, Z., Peng, Y., Fan, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., ... & Wang, J. (2023). Effects of microplastics on soil carbon mineralization: the crucial role of oxygen dynamics and electron transfer. Environmental Science & Technology57(36), 13588-13600.
Tafvizi, M., Babaakbari, M., & Delavar, M. A. (2021). Effect of Low-Density Polyethylene Microplastic Particles on Some Biological Properties and Enzymatic Activity in a Calcareous Soil. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research52(5), 1287-1297. (In Persian)
Tafvizi, M., Babaakbari, M., & Delavar, M. A. (2023). Effect of Polyethylene Microplastic Particles on Some of Nutrients Concentration in a Calcareous Soil. Applied Soil Research11(1), 30-42. (In Persian)
Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science37(1), 29-38.
Wang, C., Zhao, J., & Xing, B. (2021). Environmental source, fate, and toxicity of microplastics. Journal of hazardous materials, 407, 124357.
Wang, F., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, S., & Sun, Y. (2020). Interactions of microplastics and cadmium on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an agricultural soil. Chemosphere254, 126791.
Wang, X. X., Li, H., Chu, Q., Feng, G., Kuyper, T. W., & Rengel, Z. (2020). Mycorrhizal impacts on root trait plasticity of six maize varieties along a phosphorus supply gradient. Plant and Soil448, 71-86.
Wang, Y., Cui, W., Duan, Z., Qin, L., Zhang, H., Cheng, H., & Wang, L. (2022). Investigation of microplastic pollution on paddy fields in Xiangtan City, Southern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research29(54), 81300-81307.
Wang, Y., Wang, F., Xiang, L., Bian, Y., Wang, Z., Srivastava, P., ... & Xing, B. (2022). Attachment of positively and negatively charged submicron polystyrene plastics on nine typical soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials431, 128566.
Wischmeier, W. H., & Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning (No. 537). Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration.
Yan, S., Zhang, S., Xu, B., Yan, P., Wang, J., Wang, H., & Aurangzeib, M. (2023). Microplastics change the leaching of nitrogen and potassium in Mollisols. Science of The Total Environment878, 163121.
Yan, Z., Xu, L., Zhang, W., Yang, G., Zhao, Z., Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2021). Comparative toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Growth inhibition, oxidative stress, and cell morphology. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43, 102291.
Yang, W., Cheng, P., Adams, C. A., Zhang, S., Sun, Y., Yu, H., & Wang, F. (2021). Effects of microplastics on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in a soil spiked with ZnO nanoparticles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry155, 108179.
Yu, H., Fan, P., Hou, J., Dang, Q., Cui, D., Xi, B., & Tan, W. (2020). Inhibitory effect of microplastics on soil extracellular enzymatic activities by changing soil properties and direct adsorption: An investigation at the aggregate-fraction level. Environmental Pollution267, 115544.
Zhang, B., Yang, X., Chen, L., Chao, J., Teng, J., & Wang, Q. (2020). Microplastics in soils: a review of possible sources, analytical methods and ecological impacts. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 95(8), 2052-2068.
Zhang, H., Sun, Q., Liu, Y., Deng, Y., Liu, S., Nan, J., & Lyu, C. (2024). Polyethylene microplastic pollution changes the electrical resistance and thermal conductivity of loess soil. Journal of Environmental Management371, 123127.
Zhang, S., Wang, J., Liu, X., Qu, F., Wang, X., Wang, X., ... & Sun, Y. (2019). Microplastics in the environment: A review of analytical methods, distribution, and biological effects. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 111, 62-72.
Zhao, T., Lozano, Y. M., & Rillig, M. C. (2021). Microplastics increase soil pH and decrease microbial activities as a function of microplastic shape, polymer type, and exposure time. Frontiers in Environmental Science9, 675803.