Investigation of the Effect of Different Silicon Levels on Growth and Yield Characteristics of Quinoa Under Various Irrigation Regimes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: Mohammad.Azimi@pnu.ac.ir

2 Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: Alinaghizadeh62@pnu.ac.ir

Abstract

To study the morpho-physiological and yield responses of quinoa to silicon fertilization under drought stress conditions, a field experiment was conducted at the research farm of Payame Noor University, Gandoman, located in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province during the 2023-2024 cropping season. The experiment was arranged as split plots based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments included irrigation at four levels in the main plots (40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of field capacity), and silicon fertilization (containing 750 grams of SiO2 and 45 grams of K2O per liter) at four levels (0, 1, 2, and 3 liters per hectare) in the subplots. The results showed that the highest plant height (105.5 cm), 1000-seed weight (3.28 g), grain yield (1868 kg. ha-1), and biological yield (4690 kg. ha-1) were obtained in the treatment with 100% field capacity and 3 liters per hectare of silicon. Moreover, the highest harvest index (52.1%) was observed in the treatment with 60% field capacity and 1 liter of silicon, while the highest water use efficiency (1.14 kg.m³) was recorded in the treatment with 40% field capacity and 3 liters per hectare of silicon. Ultimately, although quinoa demonstrates a relatively good tolerance to drought, the optimal treatment for maximum quinoa yield was 100% field capacity irrigation and 3 liters per hectare of silicon. With the application of 3 liters of silicon per hectare, quinoa production has significantly increased, resulting in a net profit of 267,600,000 IRR higher compared to when silicon is not applied. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

Quinoa, recognized for its high nutritional value and resilience to adverse environmental conditions, has garnered significant attention from researchers and farmers alike. However, water scarcity and drought remain major challenges in cultivating and producing this plant in arid and semi-arid regions. The use of mineral elements such as silicon, known for its positive effects on enhancing tolerance to environmental stress, improving plant growth, and optimizing performance under water-limited conditions, has been proposed as an effective strategy. In this context, investigating the impact of different silicon levels on the growth and yield characteristics of quinoa under various irrigation regimes can provide valuable insights into optimal water resource management and the use of supplemental nutrients to enhance agricultural productivity.

Materials and Methods

 This study aimed to investigate the morpho-physiological and yield responses of quinoa to silicon fertilization under drought stress conditions at the research farm of Payame Noor University, Gandoman Center, located in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province during the 2023-2024 growing season. The experiment was conducted as a split-plot design within a randomized complete block design with three replications. Irrigation was applied at four levels in the main plots (40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of field capacity), and silicon fertilization was applied at four levels (0, 1, 2, and 3 liters per hectare) in the subplots. To apply drought stress, field capacity was first determined. For this, a 2 × 2 m plot was prepared and filled completely with water. It was then covered with plastic to ensure full saturation of the soil. After 24 hours, when water in the larger soil pores was removed by gravity, the plastic was removed, and a soil sample was taken. The sample was weighed and then dried in an oven at 105°C for 24 hours. The sample was reweighed to calculate the evaporated moisture. The product Totale Silício®, manufactured by Fertiláqua in Brazil, was used as the source of silicon. This product contains 750 grams of SiO2 and 45 grams of K2O per liter, and is a liquid suspension with a density of 1.20 grams per liter. Silicon fertilizer was applied in liquid form according to the experimental treatments. Data analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.4, and means were compared using LSD test at the 5% significance level. Graphs were created using Excel software.

Results and Discussion

The results showed that the highest plant height (105.5 cm), 1000-seed weight (3.28 g), grain yield (1868 kg. ha-1), and biological yield (4690 kg. ha-1) were achieved with 100% field capacity and 3 liters per hectare of silicon. Additionally, the highest harvest index (52.1%) was observed with 60% field capacity and 1 liter of silicon, while the highest water use efficiency (1.14 kg.m³) was recorded with 40% field capacity and 3 liters per hectare of silicon. In the 100% field capacity irrigation regime, the grain yield with 3 liters per hectare of silicon was 3%, 15%, and 49% higher compared to treatments with 2 liters, 1 liter, and no silicon, respectively. In the 40% field capacity irrigation regime, this increase for different silicon treatments compared to the maximum and minimum levels was 2%, 11%, and 89%, respectively. Furthermore, comparing grain yield between the 100% and 40% field capacity irrigation levels showed increases of 49%, 48%, 45%, and 90% for 0, 1, 2, and 3 liters of silicon per hectare, respectively. Silicon improved traits at all irrigation levels, but had a more positive effect on leaf area index, number of seeds per panicle, and water use efficiency at the 40% irrigation level compared to the 100% field capacity irrigation treatment.

Conclusion

The results of this experiment generally indicated that water scarcity reduces growth characteristics, yield, and nutrient content in quinoa leaves. In contrast, silicon fertilization mitigated the negative effects of drought. At all irrigation levels, silicon fertilization improved various plant traits, particularly leaf area index, number of seeds per panicle, leaf phosphorus, leaf nitrogen, and water use efficiency. This improvement was more pronounced at the 40% field capacity irrigation level compared to the 100% field capacity irrigation treatment. Overall, while quinoa shows relative drought resistance, the best performance for this plant was observed under 100% field capacity irrigation with 3 liters per hectare of silicon. With the application of 3 liters of silicon per hectare, quinoa production has significantly increased, resulting in a net profit of 267,600,000 IRR higher compared to when silicon is not applied.

Author Contributions

1 and 2: All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The funding for this research was provided by the budget allocation for project No. 6190/09/11/D/400, approved by the Research Council of Payame Noor University, for which we hereby express our gratitude.

Ethical considerations

 The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ahmad, F., Hameed, M., Ahmad, M.S.A. and Ashraf, M. 2021. Ensuring Food Security of Arid Regions through Sustainable Cultivation of Halophytes. In: Grigore, MN. (eds) Handbook of Halophytes. Springer, Cham. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57635-6_89
Ahmed, M., Qadeer, U. and Aslam, M. A. 2011. Silicon application and drought tolerance mechanism of sorghum. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(3), 594- 607.
Amin, M., Ahmad, R., Ali, A., Hussain, I., Mahmood, R., Aslam, M. and Lee, D. J. 2018. Influence of silicon fertilization on maize performance under limited water supply. Silicon. 10(2), 177-183.
Basirat, M. and Mousavi, S.M. 2022. Effect of Foliar Application of Silicon and Salicylic Acid on Regulation of Yield and Nutritional Responses of Greenhouse Cucumber Under High Temperature. Journal Plant Growth Regulation. 41, 1978–1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10562-5.
Bocharnikova, E.A., Loginov, S.V., Matychenkov, V.V. and Storozhenko, P.A. 2010. Silicon fertilizer efficiency. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 36, 446–448.
Chapman, H. D. and P. F. Pratt. 1961. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California, Division of Agricaltural Science.
Chen, D., Wang, S., Yin, L. and Deng, X. 2018. How Does Silicon Mediate Plant Water Uptake and Loss under Water Deficiency? Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, 281.
Chen, D., Yin, L., Deng, X. and Wang, S. 2014. Silicon increases salt tolerance by influencing the two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 36(9): 2531-2535.
Cheraghi, M., Motesharezadeh, B., Mousavi, S.M. 2023. Silicon (Si): A Regulator Nutrient for Optimum Growth of Wheat Under Salinity and Drought Stresses- A Review. Journal Plant Growth Regulation. 42, 5354–5378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10959-4.
Cristofano, F., El-Nakhel, C. and Rouphael, Y. 2021. Biostimulant Substances for Sustainable Agriculture: Origin, Operating Mechanisms and Effects on Cucurbits, Leafy Greens, and Nightshade Vegetables Species. Biomolecules. 11, 1103.
Emami, A. 1996. Methods of plant decomposition. Education and promotion of agriculture. Soil and Water Institute. 130 pages.
Epstein, E. and Bloom, A. J. 2005. Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives, 2nd edn. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, UK, 2005.
Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., Saud, S., Ihsan, M. Z., Alharby, H., Wu, C., Wang, D. and Huang, J. 2017. Crop Production under Drought and Heat Stress: Plant Responses and Management Options. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8:1147. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147.
Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., Saud, S., Ihsan, M. Z., Alharby, H., Wu, C., Wang, D. and Huang, J. 2017. Crop Production under Drought and Heat Stress: Plant Responses and Management Options. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8:1147. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147.
Farokhian, SH., Tohidi-Nejad, E. and Mohammadi-Nejad, GH. 2021. Studying the effect of bio-fertilizers on the yield components of Sesame (Sesamum indicum) genotypes under drought stress condition. Central Asian Journal of Plant Science Innovation 1(1): 32–38. DOI: 10.22034/CAJPSI.2021.01.04.
Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Ul-Allah, S. and Siddique, K.H.M. 2019. Physiological and agronomic approaches for improving water-use efficiency in crop plants. Agricultural Water Management. 219: 95–108.
Fawe, A., Menzies, J. G., Chérif, M. and Bélanger, R. R. 2001. Silicon and disease resistance in dicotyledons. Studies in Plant Science. 8: 159-169.
Ferrón-Carrillo, F., Cunha-Chiamolera, T.P.L., Peña, A.A. and Urrestarazu, M. 2022. Silicon enhances production and quality of blueberry fruits (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition. 45: 1563–1571.
Garg, N. and Bhandari, P. 2015. Silicon nutrition and mycorrhizal inoculations improve growth, nutrient status, K+ /Na+ ratio and yield of Cicer arietinum L. genotypes under salinity stress. Plant Growth Regulation. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1072 5-015-0099- x.
Ghavamsaeidi Noghabi, S., Shahidi, A. and Homami, H. 2021. Estimation of Water Requirement and Crop Coefficient for Hemp at Different Growth Stages in Birjand Plain. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 34(4), 563-573. DOI: 10.22092/jwra.2021.122794.
Gholami, Y. and Falah, A. 2013. Effects of two different sources of silicon on dry matter production, yield and yield components of rice, Tarom Hashemi variety and 843 Lines. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. (IJACS), 5(3), 227-231.
Hattori, T., Inanaga, S., Araki, H., An, P., Morita, S., Luxová, M. and Lux, A. 2005. Application of silicon enhanced drought tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Plant Physiology. 123(4), 459-466.
Hidalgo-Santiago, L., Navarro-León, E., López-Moreno, F.J., Arjó, G., Gonzáles, L.M., Ruiz, J.M. and Blasco, B. 2021. The application of the silicon-based biostimulant Codasil® offset water deficit of lettuce plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 285, 110177.
Irfan, M., Maqsood, M.A., Rehman, H.u., Mahboob, W., Sarwar, N., Hafeez, O.B.A., Hussain, S., Ercisli, S., Akhtar, M. and Aziz, T. 2023. Silicon Nutrition in Plants under Water-Deficit Conditions: Overview and Prospects. Water. 15: 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040739.
Jamali, S. and Sharifan, H. 2018. Investigation the effect of different Salinity levels on Yield and Yield components of Quinoa (Cv. Titicaca). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation. 25(2), 251-266. DOI: 10.22069/jwsc.2018.13721.2841.
Kaya, C., Tuna, L. and Higgs, D. 2006. Effect of silicon on plant growth and mineral nutrition of maize grown under water stress conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 29(8), 1469-1480.
Khan, I., Awan, S.A. and Rizwan, M. 2023. Silicon: an essential element for plant nutrition and phytohormones signaling mechanism under stressful conditions. Plant Growth Regulation. 100: 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00872-3.
Korndörfer, G. H. and Lepsch, I. 2001. Effect of silicon on plant growth and crop yield. Plant Science. 8: 133-147.
Kovács, S., Kutasy, E. and Csajbók, J. 2022. The Multiple Role of Silicon Nutrition in Alleviating Environmental Stresses in Sustainable Crop Production. Plants. 11, 1223. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/plants11091223.
Lemoine. R., La Camera, S., Atanassova, R., Dédaldéchamp, F., Allario, T., Pourtau, N., Bonnemain, J.L., Laloi, M., Coutos-Thévenot, P., Maurousset, L., Faucher, M., Girousse, C., Lemonnier, P., Parrilla, J. and Durand, M. 2013. Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Frontiers in Plant Science. 4:272. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00272.
Lux, A., Luxová, M., Abe, J., Tanimoto, E., Hattori, T. and Inanaga, S. 2003. The dynamics of silicon deposition in the sorghum root endodermis. New Phytologist, 158(3): 437-441.
Ma, Y., Dias, M. C. and Freitas, H. 2020. Drought and Salinity Stress Responses and Microbe-Induced Tolerance in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11:591911. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.591911
Merwad, A.R.M.A., Desoky, E.S.M. and Rady, M.M. 2018. Response of water deficit-stressed Vigna unguiculata performances to silicon, proline or methionine foliar application. Scientia Horticulturae. 228, 132–144.
Mousavi, S.M. 2022. Silicon and nano-silicon mediated heavy metal stress tolerance in plants- Book Chapter in: Silicon and Nano-silicon in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement: Progress and Prospects; (Edited by Etesami, H., Al Saeedi, A.H., El-Ramady, H., Fujita, M., Pessarakli, M., and Anwar Hossain, M.)- Elsevier publications.
Mukhtar, A., Asif, M. and Goyal, A. 2012. Silicon the non-essential beneficial plant nutrient to enhanced drought tolerance in wheat crop plant. In: Goyal A (ed).
Neu, S., Schaller, J. and Dudel, E.G. 2017. Silicon availability modifies nutrient use efficiency and content, C: N:P stoichiometry, and productivity of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Scientific Reports. 7, 40829.
Ning, D., Qin, A., Liu, Z., Duan, A., Xiao, J., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Zhao, B. and Liu, Z. 2020. Silicon-Mediated Physiological and Agronomic Responses of Maize to Drought Stress Imposed at the Vegetative and Reproductive Stages. Agronomy. 10, 1136.
Parveen, A., Mumtaz, S., Saleem, M.H., Hussain, I., Perveen, S. 2022. Chapter 11—Silicon and nanosilicon mediated heat stress tolerance in plants. In Silicon and Nano-Silicon in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement; Etesami, H., Al Saeedi, A.H., El-Ramady, H., Fujita, M., Pessarakli, M., Hossain, M.A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. 153–159.
Parviznia, F., Motesharezadeh, B., Mirseyed Hosseini, H. and Mousavi, S. M. 2021. Silicon Efficiency in Different zea maise Cultivars in a Calcareous Soil. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 52(5), 1275-1286. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.317643.668875.
Ramírez-Olvera, S.M., Trejo-Téllez, L.I., Gómez-Merino, F.C., Ruíz-Posadas, L.D.M., Alcántar-González, E.G. and Saucedo-Veloz, C. 2021. Silicon Stimulates Plant Growth and Metabolism in Rice Plants under Conventional and Osmotic Stress Conditions. Plants (Basel). 15;10(4):777. doi: 10.3390/plants10040777.
Rea, R.S., Islam, M.R., Rahman, M.M., Nath, B. and Mix, K. 2022. Growth, Nutrient Accumulation, and Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants with Silicon Application: A Review. Sustainability. 14, 4525.
Rehman, M., Ilahi, H., Adnan, M., Wahid, F., Rehman, F., Ullah, A., Ullah, A., Zia, A. and Raza, M. A. 2021. Application of Silicon: A Useful Way to Mitigate Drought Stress: An Overview, Current Research in Agriculture and Farming. 2(2), 9-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-7146.134.
Saud, S., Li, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Fahad, S., Hussain, S. and Chen, Y. 2014. Silicon application increases drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by improving plant water relations and morphophysiological functions. Journal of World Science. 2014:368694. doi: 10.1155/2014/368694.
Seleiman, M.F., Al-Suhaibani, N., Ali, N., Akmal, M., Alotaibi, M., Refay, Y., Dindaroglu, T., Abdul-Wajid, H.H. and Battaglia, M.L. 2021. Drought Stress Impacts on Plants and Different Approaches to Alleviate Its Adverse Effects. Plants. 10, 259.
Shammout, M.W., Qtaishat, T., Rawabdeh, H. and Shatanawi, M. 2018. Improving Water Use Efficiency under Deficit Irrigation in the Jordan Valley. Sustainability. 10, 4317.
Shen, X., Zhou, Y., Duan, L., Li, Z., Eneji, A. E. and Li, J. 2010. Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and Ultraviolet-B radiation. Journal of Plant Physiology. 167(15), 1248-1252.
Singh, K., Singh, R., Singh, J. P., Singh, Y. and Singh, K. K. 2016. Effect of level and time of silicon application on growth, yield and its uptake by rice (Oryza sativa). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 76(7): 410-413.
Terassi, D.S., Rezende, R., Wenneck, G.S., Menezes, C.S.L., Andrean, A.F.B.A., Villa e Vila, V. and Silva, L.H.M. 2021. Broccoli Production with Regulated Deficit Irrigation at Different Phenological Stages. Journal of Agricultural Science. 13, 71–80.
Villa e Vila, V., Marques, P.A.A., Rezende, R., Wenneck, G.S., Terassi, D.d.S., Andrean, A.F.B.A., Nocchi, R.C.d.F. and Matumoto-Pintro, P.T. Deficit Irrigation with Ascophyllum nodosum Extract Application as a Strategy to Increase Tomato Yield and Quality. Agronomy. 2023, 13, 1853.
Wahab, A., Abdi, G., Saleem, M.H., Ali, B., Ullah, S., Shah, W., Mumtaz, S., Yasin, G., Muresan, C.C. and Marc, R.A. 2022. Physio-Biochemical and Phyto-Hormonal Responses to Alleviate the Adverse Effects of Drought Stress: A Comprehensive Review. Plants (Basel). 21;11(13):1620. doi: 10.3390/plants11131620.
Waling, I., Van Vark, W., Houba, V. J. G. and Van der Lee, J. J. 1989. Soil and plant analysis, a series of syllabi, part 7. Plant Analysis Procedures, Wageningen Agriculture University.
Wang, M., Wang, R. and Mur, L.A.J. 2021. Functions of silicon in plant drought stress responses. Horticulture Research. 8, 254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00681-1.
White, B., Tubana, B. S., Babu, T., Mascagni, H., Agostinho, F., Datnoff, L. E. and Harrison, S. 2017. Effect of silicate slag application on wheat grown under two nitrogen rates. Plants. 6(4), 47.
Xie, Z., Song, F., Xu, H., Shao, H. and Song, R. 2014. Effects of Silicon on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Maize (Zea mays L.) on Alluvial Soil. The Scientific World Journal. 2014, 718716.
Zargar, S.M., Mahajan, R., Bhat, J.A., Nazir, M. and Deshmukh, R. 2019. Role of silicon in plant stress tolerance: opportunities to achieve a sustainable cropping system. Biotechnology. 9(3):73. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1613-z. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
Zhang, H. and Oweis, T. 1999. Water-yield relations and optimal irrigation scheduling of wheat in the Mediterranean region. Agricultural Water Management, 38(3), 195-211.
Zou, C., Li, Z. and Yu, D. 2010. Bacillus megaterium strain XTBG34 promotes plant growth by producing 2-pentylfuran. Journal of Microbiology. 48, 460–466. doi: 10.1007/s12275-010-0068-z.