Improving the soil wetting pattern in drip irrigation systems with emphasis on pulsed management

Document Type : Review

Authors

1 Water Management and Engineering Department, Collage of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural

3 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

The depth and width of the soil wetting pattern determine the spacing between irrigation laterals and the irrigation drippers that influence their numbers and the overall cost of the irrigation system. Therefore, researchers look for solutions to adapt the soil wetting pattern to the pattern of crop root growth as much as possible such as adjusting the irrigation depth and irrigation intervals, utilizing physical, capillary, and hydraulic barriers, as well as pulsed management. Pulsed drip irrigation can replace the usual method of continuous irrigation due to its ability to improve the distribution of soil moisture and consequently crop yield. It also, prevents the accumulation of water in a specific point of the soil and decrease evaporation by improving moisture distribution in the soils with heavy texture and in the soils with a light texture, can lead to a reduction of deep percolation bellow the crop root zone. The results of studies have shown that pulsed drip irrigation can have a positive effect on reducing the clogging of irrigation drippers by providing the possibility of using a dripper with a high flow rate. Therefore, the general results of the research show that the use of pulsed drip irrigation can improve crop yield and water productivity. The purpose of this study is to review the experiences of using different management methods to improve the soil wetting pattern in drip irrigation systems and also provide experimental equations for simulating the soil wetting pattern under drip irrigation systems with emphasis on pulsed management.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Improving the soil wetting pattern in drip irrigation systems with emphasis on pulsed management

 

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

Due to the lack of water resources in the world and in Iran, there is a need for effective irrigation techniques in order to contribute to the sustainable development of the agricultural sector with optimal water consumption. In this regard, the use of drip irrigation systems that provide the plant's roots with sufficient water and nutrients at the right time has been widely spread. All irrigation methods, including the drip irrigation systems, can increase water productivity only if they are designed and managed correctly for the specific soil and plant conditions. Therefore, we should look for management techniques that can match the wetting pattern around the irrigation dripper with the root growth pattern in the soil as closely as possible. In this regard, researchers investigated the use of different methods, such as adjusting the depth and intervals of irrigation, utilizing physical, capillary, and hydraulic barriers, as well as pulse management. This knowledge ensures accurate delivery of water and nutrients to the crop root zone, facilitates irrigation planning, and enables matching the soil wetting pattern with the plant root growth pattern.

Materials and Methods

Considering the importance of soil moisture distribution and the effect of improving the dimensions of the soil wetting pattern on crop yield and water productivity in drip irrigation systems, researchers investigated the use of different methods, such as adjusting the depth and intervals of irrigation, utilizing physical, capillary, and hydraulic barriers, as well as pulse management. This knowledge ensures accurate delivery of water and nutrients to the crop root zone, facilitates irrigation planning, and enables matching the soil wetting pattern with the plant root growth pattern. The present study reviewed the experiences of using different management methods to improve the soil wetting pattern and provide experimental equations with an emphasis on pulsed management.

Results and discussion

Pulsed management in drip irrigation systems includes using a series of On and Off cycles. The Off-time cycles in this management allow sufficient opportunity to redistribute moisture in the soil after each irrigation pulse. The results of various researches that have been conducted in the field of using pulsed drip irrigation in the world and Iran show that pulsed management has the possibility of improving the dimensions of soil wetting pattern in the crop root zone. In soils with a light texture, it reduces deep percolation and as a result, reduces the loss of water and nutrients, and in soils with a heavy texture, it causes aeration of the root zone and more appropriate distribution of water and nutrients in the crop root zone, which can lead to improved crop yield. Also, the results of the investigations have shown that the soil wetting pattern around the drippers with high flow rates when using pulse management is similar to the soil wetting pattern produced by the drippers with low flow rates. Due to the fact that in drippers with a low flow rate, the smallness of the dripper opening leads to clogging problems, by using pulse management that allows the use of a dripper with a higher flow rate, the problems related to the clogging of the drippers can be reduced to some extent. In relation to the distribution of salt and nitrate under pulsed drip irrigation system, positive results have also been reported by researchers, but due to the importance of the issue, more extensive research is needed in this field.

Conclusion

In recent years, pulsed drip irrigation has replaced the usual (continuous) irrigation method due to its efficiency and saving in water consumption, the ability to precisely adjust the amount of water required by plants and reduce irrigation costs. Also, this irrigation method plays an important role in reducing soil and water pollution. The purpose of this study is to investigate the results of pulsed drip irrigation systems in Iran and the world. The studies show that pulsed drip irrigation can have a positive effect on the plant growth and yield. This type of irrigation increases the absorption of water and nutrients by plants and also increases root activity and the development of the root system of plants. In addition, pulse irrigation can improve the distribution of moisture in the soil and prevent the accumulation of water in a certain point. This causes the evaporation of water from the soil and the evaporation of transpiration of plants to happen in a more uniform way and leads to the improvement of irrigation efficiency. Also, pulse irrigation can have a positive effect on the clogging of irrigation drippers.

Abd-Elhakim, A., Elmeadawy, M., El-Sybaee, I. & Egela, M. (2021). Effect Use of Pulsed Deficit Drip Irrigation for Tomato Crop in Greenhouse powered by solar energy. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering38(1), 1-14.
Abdelraouf, R. E., Azab, A., Tarabye, H. H. H., & Refaie, K. M. (2019). Effect of pulse drip irrigation and organic mulching by rice straw on yield, water productivity and quality of orange under sandy soils conditions. Plant Archives19(2), 2613-2621.
Abuarab, M. E., El-Mogy, M., & Lotfy, A. (2011). Response of green bean to pulse subsurface trickle irrigation. Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering28, 1-17.
Almeida, W. F. D., Paz, V. P. D. S., de Jesus, A. P., Silva, J. S. D., Gonçalves, K. S., & Oliveira, A. S. D. (2018). Yield of green beans subjected to continuous and pulse drip irrigation with saline water. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental22, 476-481.
Al-Naeem, M. A. (2008). Use of pulse trickles to reduce clogging problems in trickle irrigation system in Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences: PJBS11(1), 68-73.
Al-Ogaidi, A. A., Wayayok, A., Rowshon, M. K., & Abdullah, A. F. (2016). Wetting patterns estimation under drip irrigation systems using an enhanced empirical model. Agricultural Water Management, 176, 203-213.
Amin, M. S., & Ekhmaj, A. I. (2006, September). DIPAC-drip irrigation water distribution pattern calculator. In 7th International micro irrigation congress (Vol. 1016).
Arriero, S. S., Almeida, W. F. D., Paz, V. P. D. S., & Damasceno, L. F. (2020). Yield of eggplant using low quality water and pulse drip irrigation. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental24, 822-826.
Awady, M. N., Wassif, M. A., Abd-El-Salam, M. F., & El-Farrah, M. A. (2008, March). Moisture distribution from subsurface dripping using saline water in sandy soil. In The 15th Annual Conference of the Misr Society of Ag Eng. Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering (pp. 477-496).
Bakeer, G., El-Ebabi, F. & El-Saidi, M. (2009). Effect of pulse drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of potato crop under organic agriculture in sandy soils. Misr Journal of Agriculture Engineering, 26: 736-765.
Barth, H. K., & Lamm, E. R. (1995). Resource conservation and preservation through a new subsurface irrigation system. Microirrigation for changing world: Conserving resources/Preserving the environment. Proceed Fifth Intern Microirrigation Cong. Orlando, Florida, 168-174.
Bordovsky, J. P., & Porter, D. (2003). Cotton response to pre-plant irrigation level and irrigation capacity using spray, LEPA, and subsurface drip irrigation. In 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting (p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Bresler, E. (1977) Trickle-drip irrigation: principles and application to soil-water management. Advances in Agronomy, 29:343–393.
Bristow, K. L., Cote, C. M., Thorburn, P. J., & Cook, F. J. (2000). Soil wetting and solute transport in trickle irrigation systems. In 6th International Micro-irrigation Congress (Micro 2000), Cape Town, South Africa, 22-27 October 2000 (pp. 1-9). International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID).
Colaizzi, P.D., Schneider, A.D., Evett, S.R. and Howell, T.A. (2004). Comparison of SDILEPA, and spray irrigation performance for grain sorghum. Trans. ASAE, 47: 1477–1492.
Cook, F. J., Thorburn, P. J., Fitch, P., & Bristow, K. L. (2003). WetUp: a software tool to display approximate wetting patterns from drippers. Irrigation Science, 22(3-4), 129-134.
Cote, C. M., Bristow, K. L., Charlesworth, P. B., Cook, F. J., & Thorburn, P. J. (2003). Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in subsurface trickle irrigation. Irrigation Science, 22(3-4), 143-156.
Eid, A. R., Bakry, B. A. & Taha, M. H. (2013). Effect of pulse drip irrigation and mulching systems on yield, quality traits and irrigation water use efficiency of soybean under sandy soil conditions. Agricultural Sciences, 4: 249-261.
Elawady, M. N., Abd El-Salam, M. F., Elnawawy, M. M., & El-Farrah, M. A. (2003, October). Surface and subsurface irrigation effects on Spinach and sorghum. In The 4th Annual Conference of Misr Society of Agricultural Engineers (pp. 118-130).
Elmaloglou, S., & Diamantopoulos, E. (2007). Wetting front advance patterns and water losses by deep percolation under the root zone as influenced by pulsed drip irrigation. Agricultural water management90(1-2), 160-163.
Elmaloglou, S., & Diamantopoulos, E. (2009). Effects of hysteresis on redistribution of soil moisture and deep percolation at continuous and pulse drip irrigation. Agricultural water management96(3), 533-538.
Elnesr, M. (2012). Subsurface drip irrigation development and modeling of wetting pattern. Lap Lambert Academic.
Elnesr, M. N., & Alazba, A. A. (2015). The effects of three techniques that change the wetting patterns over subsurface drip-irrigated potatoes. Spanish journal of agricultural research, 13(3), e1204-e1204.
Elnesr, M. N., Alazba, A. A., & Šimůnek, J. (2014). HYDRUS simulations of the effects of dual-drip subsurface irrigation and a physical barrier on water movement and solute transport in soils. Irrigation science, 32, 111-125.
Gardenas, A. I., Hopmans, J. W., Hanson, B. R., & Simunek, J. (2005). Two-dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro-irrigation. Agricultural water management, 74(3), 219-242.
Gendron, L., Létourneau, G., Cormier, J., Depardieu, C., Boily, C., Levallois, R., & Caron, J. (2018). Using pulsed water applications and automation technology to improve irrigation practices in strawberry production. HortTechnology28(5), 642-650.
Goyal, M. R. (2015). Research Advances in Sustainable Micro Irrigation, 1st edn. Oakville: Apple Academic Press, Canada.
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., & Mohammadi, S. (2021a). Determining yield response factor (ky) of silage maize under different irrigation levels of pulsed and continuous irrigation management. Central Asian Journal of Plant Science Innovation1(4), 214-220.
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., & mohammadi, S. (2021b). Estimating Silage Maize Crop Coefficient and Water Stress Coefficient under Different Irrigation Levels using Soil Water Balance Method (Case Study: Varamin Region). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(9), 2359-2371. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.326719.669013.
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., & mohammadi, S. (2021c). Determining Actual Evapotranspiration of Silage Maize using Soil Water Balance Method under Different Drip Irrigation Levels with Pulsed and Continuous Management (Case Study: Varamin Region). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research52(7), 1869-1880. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.322095.668940
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., DehghaniSanij, H., & Mohammadi, S. (2021d). Effects of Different Pulsed Drip Irrigation Levels on the Yield and Water Productivity of Silage Maize. Water and Irrigation Management11(2), 87-98. (In Persian)
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehaghani Sanich, H., & Mohammadi, S. (2021e). Investigating the effect of deficit irrigation on yield and water productivity of silage maize under pulsed and continuous drip irrigation management. Iranian Water Researches Journal15(3), 15-23.
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., & Mohammadi, S. (2022). The Effects of Two Irrigation Management on Growth Indices of Silage Maize in arid and semi-arid climates. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage15(6), 1444-1458. (In Persian)
Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., & Mohammadi, S. (2019). Soil Wetting Pattern of Drip Irrigated Maize as influenced by Deficit Irrigation and Discharge Rate. 1th International and 4th National Congress on Iranian Irrigation and Drainage (INCIID 2019).
Hajirad, I., Mohammadi, S., & Dehghanisanij, H. (2023). Determining the critical points of a basin from the point of view of water productivity and water consumption using the wapor database. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 25(1), 86.
Henggeler, J. (1995). A history of drip-irrigated cotton, in Texas Micro-irrigation for a Changing World: Conserving Resources/Preserving the Environment. Proc. Fifth International Micro-irrigation Congress, 669–674
Howell, T.A., Schneider, A. & Evett, S. (1997). Subsurface and surface micro-irrigation of corn—southern high plains. Trans. ASAE, 40: 635–641.
Hozayn, M., El-Monem, A. A. A., Abdelraouf, R. E., & Abdalla, M. M. (2013). Do magnetic water affect water use efficiency, quality and yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plant under arid regions conditions?. Journal of Agronomy, 12(1), 1-10.
Huang, L., Yang, P., Ren, S., & Cui, H. (2018). Effects of continuous and pulse irrigation with different nitrogen applications on soil moisture, nitrogen transport and accumulation in root systems. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11(5), 139-149.
Ismail, S. M., El-abedin, T. Z., Wassif, A., & El-Nesr, M. N. (2006). Drip irrigation systems in sandy soil using physical and hydraulic barriers. Misr J. Ag. Eng, 23(4), 1021-1034.
Ismail, S., Zien-El-Abedin, T., Omara, A. A. & Abdel-Tawab, E. (2014). Modeling the soil wetting pattern under pulse and continus drip irrigation. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 14(9): 913-922.
Ityel, E., Lazarovitch, N., Silberbush, M., & Ben-Gal, A. (2011). An artificial capillary barrier to improve root-zone conditions for horticultural crops: response of pepper, lettuce, melon, and tomato. Irrigation Science, 30: 293-301.
Ityel, E., Lazarovitch, N., Silberbush, M., & Ben-Gal, A. (2010). An artificial capillary barrier to improve root zone conditions for horticultural crops: physical effects on water content. Irrigation science, 29: 171-180.
Jackson, R. C., & Kay, M. G. (1987). Use of pulse irrigation for reducing clogging problems in trickle emitters. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research37(3-4), 223-227.
Kampf, M., Holfelder, T., & Montenegro, H. (1998). Inspection and numerical simulations of flow processes in capillary barrier cover systems. In Advances in hydro-science and engineering, proceedings of the 3rd international conference on hydro-science and-engineering. Brandenburg University, Cottbus.
Kandelous, M. M., & Šimůnek, J. (2010). Comparison of numerical, analytical, and empirical models to estimate wetting patterns for surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Irrigation Science, 28, 435-444.
Kandelous, M. M., Liaghat, A., & Abbasi, F. (2008). Estimation of soil wetting pattern in subsurface drip irrigation using dimension alanalysis method. Journal Agricalture Science. 39(2):371–378. (In Persian)
Kandelous, M. M., Šimůnek, J., Van Genuchten, M. T., & Malek, K. (2011). Soil water content distributions between two emitters of a subsurface drip irrigation system. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(2), 488-497.
Karimi, B., & Karimi, N. (2020). Simulation of Wetted Area of Moisture Bulb in Pulsed Drip Irrigation. Water and Soil, 34(2), 349-364. doi: 10.22067/jsw.v34i2.82228. (In Persian)
Karimi, B., & Karimi, N. (2022). Evaluation of moisture advance front pattern in subsurface drip irrigation with continuous and pulsed flow. Water Resources Engineering, 14(51), 21-38. doi: 10.30495/wej.2022.20462.2120. (In Persian)
Karimi, B., Sohrabi, T., Mirzaei, F., & Ababaei, B. (2015). Developing Equations to Predict the Pattern of Soils Moisture Redistribution in Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems Using Dimension Analysis. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 21(6), 223-237. (In Persian)
Karmeli, D., & Peri, G. (1974). Basic principles of pulse irrigation. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 100(3), 309-319.
Keller, J., & Bliesner, R. D. (1990). Sprinkle and trickle irrigation (Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 86-96). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Kim, D. H., Kim, J. S., Kwon, S. H., Park, J. M., & Choi, W. S. (2021). Simulation of Soil Water Movement in Upland Soils Under Pulse Irrigation using HYDRUS-2D. Journal of Biosystems Engineering46(4), 508-516.
Liu, X.F., Wan, S.Q., Feng, L., Jiang, S.F., Kang, Y.H. & Liu, S.P. (2015). Response of potato yield and irrigation water use efficiency under subsurface drip irrigation at various lateral depths. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 34: 63–66.
Lubana, P. P. S. & Narda, N. K. (2001). Modelling soil water dynamics under trickle emitters-a review. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research, 78(3): 217–232.
Lubana, P. P. S., Narda, N. K. & Brown, L. C. (2002). Application of a hemispherical model to predict radius of wetted soil volume under point source emitters for trickle irrigated tomatoes in Punjab state. Trans ASABE, 32: 243–257.
Madane, D. A., Mane, M. S., Kadam, U. S., Thokal, R. T., Patil, S. T., Nandgude, S. B., & Dhekale, J. S. (2018). Effect of Pulse Irrigation (Drip) Influencing Different Irrigation Levels on Growth and Yield Parameters of White Onion (Allium cepa L.). Advanced Agricultural Research & Technology Journal, 2(2).
Madane, D. A., Maneb, M. S., Kadamb, U. S., & Thokalc, R. T. (2018). Effect of pulse irrigation (drip) through different irrigation levels on moisture distribution pattern and yield of white onion (Alium cepa L.). Plant Archives, 18(1), 1065-1073.
Malek, K., & Peters, R. T. (2011). Wetting pattern models for drip irrigation: new empirical model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137(8), 530-536.
Mirzaei, F., & Biegi, A. M. (2020). Modeling Distribution of Potassium in the Soil in Under Drip Irrigation. J Soil Water Sci4(1), 122-131.
Mirzaei, F., Alkasir, Z., & moini, A. (2020). Modeling for Estimating Soil Moisture Dimensions in Drip Irrigation in Layer Soil Using Dimensional Analysis Method. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 14(2), 570-578. (In Persian)
Mohammad beigi, A., Mirzaei, F., & Ashraf, N. (2016). Evaluation and comparing of redistribution of moisture in drip irrigation by pulsed flow and continuous flow. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 47(3), 467-473. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2016.59317. (In Persian)
Mohammadbeigi, A., Mirzaei. F., & Ashraf. N. (2017). Simulation of soil moisture distribution under drip irrigation pulsed and continuous in dimensional analysis method. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 23(6), 163-180. doi: 10.22069/jwfst.2017.9762.2412. (In Persian)
Mohammadi S., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., Hajirad, I. (2019). Effects of Pulsed Drip Irrigation on Soil Moisture Distribution under water stress Conditions. 1th International and 4th National Congress on Iranian Irrigation and Drainage (INCIID 2019).
Mohammadi, S., Mirlatifi, S. M., Homaee, M., Dehghanisanij, H., & hajirad, I. (2021a). Determination of Silage Maize Crop Coefficient under Pulsed Drip Irrigation using Water Balance Method in Varamin. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research52(5), 1223-1237. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.316676.668865.
Mohammadi, S., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., hajirad, I., & Homaee, M. (2021b). Modeling Soil Wetting Patterns under Pulsed Drip Irrigation by Dimensional Analysis Method and Comparison with HYDRUS-2D Numerical Model. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research52(7), 1903-1913. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.322796.668947.
Mohammadi, S., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., & Homaee, M. (2021c). Effect of Pulsed Management in Drip Irrigation on Yield, Yield Components and Water Productivity of Silage Maize. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research51(12), 3135-3145. (In Persian)
Mohammadi, S., Mirlatifi, S. M., Dehghanisanij, H., hajirad, I., & homaee, M. (2022). Simulation and investigation of Soil Moisture Distribution and Wetting Patterns in a Clay Soil under Pulsed Drip Irrigation. Iranian Water Researches Journal16(2), -. Doi: 10.22034/iwrj.2022.13788.2385. (In Persian)
Mohammadi, S., Mirlatifi, S. M., Homaee, M., Dehghanisanij, H., & Hajirad, I. (2023). Evaluation of silage maize production under pulsed drip irrigation in a semi-arid region. Irrigation Science, 1-15.
Moncef, H., and Khemaies, Z. (2016). An analytical approach to predict the moistened bulb volume beneath a surface point source. Agricultural Water Management, 166, 123-129.
Moncef, H., Hedi, D., Jelloul, B., & Mohamed, M. (2002). Approach for predicting the wetting front depth beneath a surface point source: theory and numerical aspect. Irrigation and Drainage: The Journal of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, 51(4), 347-360.
Naglič, B., Kechavarzi, C., Coulon, F., & Pintar, M. (2014). Numerical investigation of the influence of texture, surface drip emitter discharge rate and initial soil moisture condition on wetting pattern size. Irrigation science, 32, 421-436.
Pelletier, G., & Tan, C. S. (1993). Determining irrigation wetting patterns using time domain reflectometry. HortScience, 28(4), 338-339.
Phene, C. J., Davis, K. R., Hutmacher, R. B., & McCormick, R. L. (1986, August). Advantages of subsurface irrigation for processing tomatoes. In II International Symposium on Processing Tomatoes, XXII IHC 200 (pp. 101-114).
Phogat, V., Skewes, M. A., Mahadevan, M., & Cox, J. W. (2013). Evaluation of soil plant system response to pulsed drip irrigation of an almond tree under sustained stress conditions. Agricultural Water Management118, 1-1.
Rank, P. H. (2019). Development and evaluation of an automated pulse irrigation system (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Kelappaji College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Tavanur).
Schwartzman, M., & Zur, B. (1986). Emitter spacing and geometry of wetted soil volume. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 112(3), 242-253.
Singh, D. K., Rajput, T. B. S., Sikarwar, H. S., Sahoo, R. N., & Ahmad, T. (2006). Simulation of soil wetting pattern with subsurface drip irrigation from line source. Agricultural water management, 83(1-2), 130-134.
Skaggs, T. H., Trout, T. J., Šimůnek, J., & Shouse, P. J. (2004). Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 130(4), 304-310.
Stormont, J. C., & Morris, C. E. (1998). Method to estimate water storage capacity of capillary barriers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(4), 297-302.
Subbaiah, R. (2013). A review of models for predicting soil water dynamics during trickle irrigation. Irrigation Science, 31(3), 225-258.
Thorburn, P. J., Cook, F. J., & Bristow, K. L. (2003). Soil-dependent wetting from trickle emitters: implications for system design and management. Irrigation Science, 22(3-4), 121-127.
Vyrlas, P., and Sakellariou, M. (2005). Intermittent water application through surface and subsurface drip irrigation. ASAE Annual International Meeting, Tampa, FL, USA. Available in http:// goo.gl/3Gn7xb.
Welsh, D. F., Kreuter, U. P., Byles, J. D., & Lamm, E. R. (1995, April). Enhancing subsurface drip irrigation through vector flow. In Proceedings of the 5th International Microirrigation Congress, Orlando, FA, ASAE (pp. 2-6).
Zamora, V. R. O., da Silva, M. M., Santos Júnior, J. A., da Silva, G. F., Menezes, D., & de Almeida, C. D. G. C. (2021). Assessing the productivity of coriander under different irrigation depths and fertilizers applied with continuous and pulsed drip systems. Water Supply21(5), 2099-2108.