Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research

Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research

Soil Properties Response to Ecosystem Rehabilitation through Pit Seeding in Mountain Rangelands

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Nature Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Yasouj University
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of pit-seeding on vegetation cover indices and soil properties in the Tang-Sorkh rangelands of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. The research was conducted as a comparative study between pit-seeded and control areas. Vegetation attributes were assessed using 1 m² quadrats established along transects, and soil samples were collected from two depths (0–15 and 15–30 cm). The results indicated that pit-seeding induced significant changes in most of the studied variables. Vegetation cover (79.15%) and litter cover (16.44%) increased significantly, whereas bare soil (4.12%) and gravel cover (4.26%) decreased. Regarding soil physical properties, pit-seeding significantly increased clay content while reducing sand content and mean particle diameter (p<‌0.01), with no significant effect on silt content. In terms of soil chemical characteristics, significant treatment effects were observed for soil pH, organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and lime content. Soil biological attributes exhibited the strongest response, with basal respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and the microbial biomass C:N ratio being significantly affected by pit-seeding (p< 0.01). The highest values of BR (1.949 mg CO₂ kg⁻1 soil h⁻1), SIR (2.136 mg CO₂ kg⁻1 soil h⁻1), MBC (260.00 mg kg-1), and MBN (13.85 mg kg-1) were recorded in the pit-seeded area within the 0–15 cm soil layer.
Keywords
Subjects

Introduction

Rangeland ecosystems, covering approximately half of the Earth's terrestrial surface, represent a fundamental component of global ecological sustainability. These landscapes are critical not only for maintaining environmental balance but also for providing a wide array of ecosystem services. Key provisioning services include forage for livestock, medicinal plants, and resources for apiculture. Simultaneously, rangelands deliver essential regulating and supporting services, such as soil conservation, water cycle regulation, nutrient cycling, and erosion control. Moreover, they offer vital habitats for wildlife, significantly contributing to biodiversity preservation and overall ecological stability. Arid and semi-arid rangelands, characterized by inherent constraints such as limited precipitation, high temperatures, and shallow soils, are particularly sensitive to environmental fluctuations and anthropogenic pressures, making them inherently fragile ecosystems. Their susceptibility to climatic variability, combined with challenges such as overgrazing and vegetation degradation, underscores the urgent need for sustainable management and conservation strategies. Beyond their immediate ecological functions, preserving these ecosystems is essential for maintaining their capacity to provide multifunctional services, including soil quality enhancement, hydrological regulation, and nutrient retention, all of which are critical for long-term environmental health and human well-being. In Iran's Zagros Mountains, these ecosystems have suffered extensive degradation over decades due to chronic overgrazing and climatic pressures, resulting in substantial vegetation loss, accelerated soil erosion, and disruption of essential ecological processes. Pit-seeding is a widely employed, low-cost rehabilitation method designed to capture runoff, improve soil moisture, and facilitate plant establishment. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding its long-term efficacy in restoring comprehensive ecosystem health. Most existing studies have focused primarily on short-term vegetation responses, leaving the sustained impacts on soil biological properties particularly microbial communities that drive nutrient cycling and organic matter dynamics largely unquantified. This knowledge deficit is especially relevant in the highland rangelands of Tang-Sorkh, a representative and ecologically important area within the Zagros Mountains that supports local pastoral economies. Understanding the long-term trajectory of restoration in this region provides a valuable model for similar degraded landscapes. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the 14-year effects of pit-seeding operations on a comprehensive set of indicators, including vegetation cover structure, key soil physicochemical properties, and fundamental soil biological health parameters in these degraded rangelands.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted in the Tang-Sorkh highland rangelands, located in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. The research was designed as a comparative study by selecting two adjacent areas with similar environmental conditions: one area subjected to Pit-Seeding operations with a 14-year history, and a control area with no history of rehabilitation practices. Vegetation sampling was carried out during the growing season using a randomized-systematic approach with transects and 1m×1m quadrats. Within each quadrat, the percent cover of vegetation, litter, bare soil, and gravel was recorded. Soil samples were collected from two depths (0-15 cm and 15-30 cm) using a completely random design from each study area. for physicochemical properties (texture, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium, CEC, etc.) and biological indices: Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC) and Nitrogen (MBN) (by fumigation-extraction), Basal Respiration (BR), and Substrate-Induced Respiration (SIR) of the soil were measured in the laboratory. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) in SPSS software version26.

Results and Discussion

The results indicated that pit-seeding induced significant changes in most of the studied variables. Vegetation cover (79.15%) and litter cover (16.44%) increased significantly, whereas bare soil (4.12%) and gravel cover (4.26%) decreased. Regarding soil physical properties, pit-seeding significantly increased clay content while reducing sand content and mean particle diameter (p < 0.01); however, no significant effect was observed on silt content (p > 0.05). In terms of soil chemical characteristics, pit-seeding had significant effects on soil pH, organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and calcium (Ca) at the 1% probability level (p < 0.01), and on Ca(OH)₂ content at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05). In contrast, electrical conductivity (EC), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), chloride (Cl), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) were not significantly affected by the treatment (p > 0.05). Soil biological attributes exhibited the strongest response to pit-seeding, with basal respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and the microbial biomass C:N ratio being significantly influenced by the treatment (p < 0.01). The highest values of BR (1.949 mg CO₂ kg⁻1 soil h⁻1), SIR (2.136 mg CO₂ kg⁻1 soil h⁻1), MBC (260.00 mg kg-1), and MBN (13.85 mg kg-1) were recorded in the pit-seeded area within the 0–15 cm soil layer.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that simple Pit-Seeding operations can effectively initiate a positive restoration feedback loop in degraded Mountain Rangelands, simultaneously improving vegetation, soil physicochemical quality, and most critically soil biological health. We highlight soil microbial parameters as essential indicators for monitoring rehabilitation success. For long-term resilience, Pit-Seeding should be integrated into participatory rangeland management programs, combined with native species seeding and managed grazing. Long-term monitoring of soil biological health is crucial to ensure sustained recovery. Our findings confirm Pit-Seeding as a practical, low-cost ecological tool for restoring ecosystem structure and function in semi-arid regions.

Funding

The study was funded by the University of Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.

Authorship contribution

The manuscript has a single author.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

There is no use of any type of artificial intelligence-based technology in this paper.

Data availability statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges Yasouj University, particularly the Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, and the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province for their generous support and valuable assistance, which made this research possible.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest

Ahmadvand, M., & Akhzari, D. (2024). Studying the effect of exclosure and pit-seeding on soil properties of rangelands (Case study: Darani Rangelands, Tuyserkan City, Hamadan Province). Human & Environment, 22(1), 1–13. (In Persian)
Akbarzadeh, P., & Nikoo, S. (2022). Effects of land use change on groundwater quality (Case study: Damghan Watershed). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 9(2), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.22059/ije.2022.340711.1622 (In Persian)
Akhzari, D., & Talebi, S. (2025). Effects of Bromus kopetdaghensis Drobov pit-seeding on soil and vegetation characteristics in a semi-arid rangeland. ECOPERSIA, 13(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.22034/ECOPERSIA.13.3.243
Álvarez-Holguín, A., Morales-Nieto, C. R., Corrales-Lerma, R., et al. (2024). Grass species with potential for rangelands restoration in northern Mexico: An assessment with environmental niche modeling. Scientific Reports, 14, 6318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56918-1
Bardgett, R. D., Bullock, J. M., Lavorel, S., et al. (2021). Combatting global grassland degradation. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2
Bastani, M., Sadeghipour, A., Kamali, N., Zarafshar, M., & Bazoot, S. (2023). How does livestock graze management affect woodland soil health? Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1028149
Bengtsson, J., Bullock, J. M., Egoh, B., Everson, C., Everson, T., O’Connor, T., et al. (2019). Grasslands more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere, 10(2), e02582. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2582
Block, W. M., Franklin, A. B., Wardyr, J. P., Ganey, J. L., & White, G. C. (2001). Design and implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration of wildlife. Restoration Ecology, 9(3), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003293.x
Chapman, H. (1965). Cation exchange capacity. In Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties.
Chen, L., Baoyin, T., & Xia, F. (2022). Grassland management strategies influence soil C, N, and P sequestration through shifting plant community composition in semi-arid grasslands of northern China. Ecological Indicators, 34, 1–12.
Dasgupta, D., & Brahmaprakash, G. (2021). Soil microbes are shaped by soil physico-chemical properties: A brief review of existing literature. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 33, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i130409
Dehdari, S., Khorsandi Kouhanestani, Z., & Noedoost, F. (2025). Economic valuation of ecosystem services in the context of ecological sustainability (Study area: Vargar Basin pastures). Social Business, 2(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsbu.2025.391739.1014 (In Persian)
Farzi, H., Tamartash, R., Jafarian, Z., & Tatian, M. R. (2019). Investigation of biological effects on vegetation change and soil sequestration in rangelands of the southern hills of central Alborz. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 72(2), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2019.264094.1290 (In Persian)
Gao, Y., Liu, L., Ma, S., Zhou, Y., Jia, R., Li, X., & Wang, B. (2024). Vegetation restoration in dryland with shrub serves as a carbon sink: Evidence from a 13-year observation at the Tengger Desert of Northern China. Land Degradation & Development, 35(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4900
Gayan, A., Borah, P., Nath, D., & Kataki, R. (2023). Soil microbial diversity, soil health and agricultural sustainability. In Sustainable agriculture and the environment (pp. 107–126). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90500-8.00006-3
Ghobadi, A., & Akhzari, D. (2021). Effects of rangeland exclosure on chemical and organic properties of soil (Case study: Gonbad Area). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(10), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2021.32769.4059 (In Persian)
Guo, Y., Wu, J., & Yu, Y. (2022). Differential response of soil microbial community structure in coal mining areas during different ecological restoration processes. Processes, 10(10), 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102013
Joneidi, H., Kakekhani, S., & Kamali, N. (2024). Comparison of physicochemical and biological soil properties under different rangeland management practices. Journal of Rangeland, 18(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20080891.1403.18.1.7.3 (In Persian)
Kamali, N., Soori, M., Eftekhari, A., & Ashoori, P. (2020). Protection levels and distribution of organic carbon in size fractions of soil (Case of: Salook, North Khorasan). Journal of Rangeland, 14(1), 85–95. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-868-fa.html (In Persian)
Kamali, N., Sadeghipour, A., Souri, M., & Mastinu, A. (2022). Variations in soil biological and biochemical indicators under different grazing intensities and seasonal changes. Land, 11(9), 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091537
Karimian, V., & Barani, H. (2025). Identifying commonly used medicinal and industrial plants in desert rangelands and investigating local community awareness about them (Case study: Khaf County, Khorasan Razavi Province). Desert Management, 12(4), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.22034/jdmal.2025.2045459.1490 (In Persian)
Karimian, V., Sepehri, A., & Barani, H. 2018. Effects of different utilization methods of Ferula assa foetida L. on oleo-gum-resin production (Case Study: Tangsorkh rangeland, Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad province). Journal of Rangeland, 12(3), 304–295. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-644-fa.html (In Persian)
Mirzaee, M., Gholami, P., & Jahantab, E. (2018). Species composition and diversity changes in semi-steppe rangelands of Zagros under biological restoration. Journal of Rangeland, 12(3), 330–340. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-647-fa.html (In Persian)
Moameri, M., Mohammadi Rad, Z., Noori, D., & Ghorbani, A. (2025). Assessment of key indicators influencing rangeland management: Perspectives of local stakeholders in Nir County, Ardabil. Journal of Rangeland, 19(2), 226–245. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-1311-fa.html (In Persian)
Mohseni, S., Tavili, A., Jafari, M., & Vahabzadeh, R. (2024). Evaluation of the effect of planting projects on soil and vegetation characteristics in the salt lands along Lake Urmia. Journal of Rangeland, 18(2), 169–183. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-795-fa.html (In Persian)
Moradi, H. R., Rezaei, V., & Erfanian, M. (2024). Investigation of physicochemical characteristics of soil in badland areas formation. Researches in Earth Sciences, 15(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.48308/esrj.2021.101282
Qu, Y., Tang, J., Li, Z., Zhou, Z., Wang, J., Wang, S., & Cao, Y. (2020). Soil enzyme activity and microbial metabolic function diversity in soda saline–alkali rice paddy fields of Northeast China. Sustainability, 12(23), 10095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310095
Rasiah, V., & Kay, B. D. (1994). Characterizing changes in aggregate stability subsequent to introduction of forages. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58, 935–942. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030042x
Rezaei, E., & Dehdari, S. (2019). Effects of biologically improvement treatments on vegetation performance (Case study: Zalo Ab Abdanan rangelands). Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 71(4), 929–938. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2019.244653.1181 (In Persian)
Sadeghi, S., Petermann, B. J., Steffan, J., Brevik, E., & Gedeon, G. (2023). Predicting microbial responses to changes in soil physical and chemical properties under different land management. Applied Soil Ecology, 188, 104878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104878
Schuman, G. E., Janzen, H. H., & Herrick, J. E. (2002). Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environmental Pollution, 116, 391–396.
Sollenberger, L. E., Kohmann, M. M., Dubeux, J. C. B., & Silveira, M. L. (2019). Grassland management affects delivery of regulating and supporting ecosystem services. Crop Science, 59, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.09.0594
Sui, X., Zhang, R., Frey, B., Yang, L., Liu, Y., Ni, H., & Li, M. H. (2021). Soil physicochemical properties drive the variation in soil microbial communities along a forest successional series in a degraded wetland in northeastern China. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 2194–2208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7184
Teague, R., & Kreuter, U. (2020). Managing grazing to restore soil health, ecosystem function, and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 534187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.534187
Ternan, J. L., Williams, A. G., Elmes, A., & Hartley, R. (1996). Aggregate stability of soils in central Spain and the role of land management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21, 181–193.
Trivedi, P., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Anderson, I. C., & Singh, B. K. (2016). Response of soil properties and microbial communities to agriculture: Implications for primary productivity and soil health indicators. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00990
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (L. A. Richards, Ed.). USDA Handbook No. 60. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wang, Y., Lv, W., Xue, K., et al. (2022). Grassland changes and adaptive management on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00330-8
Xu, H., Zhang, Z., Yu, X., Li, T., & Chen, Z. (2023). The construction of an ecological security pattern based on the comprehensive evaluation of the importance of ecosystem service and ecological sensitivity: A case of Yangxin County, Hubei Province. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1154166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1154166
Zhang, J. T. (2005). Succession analysis of plant communities in abandoned croplands in the Eastern Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Environments, 63(2), 458–474.