Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research

Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research

Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Flood Frequency Across Different Return Periods Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of the Poldokhtar Basin

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Associate prof. Water sciences and engineering, department, faculty of agricultural and natural resources. Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
Abstract
Climate change is one of the major drivers altering the hydrological regime of watersheds and intensifying extreme events such as floods. This study aimed to assess the impacts of climate change on flood frequency in the Poldokhtar Basin, Iran. To this end, precipitation data from CMIP6 climate models under the SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, and SSP585 scenarios were extracted and bias-corrected using the XGBoost algorithm. The results indicated that MAE decreased from 2.1–2.4 mm to 1.1–1.5 mm, while RMSE was reduced from 6.2–7 mm to 4–4.8 mm after bias correction. Furthermore, the calibration results of the MME-XGBoost model demonstrated satisfactory performance, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values between 0.58 and 0.70. Daily streamflow was subsequently simulated using the ANFIS-PSO model, which achieved coefficients of determination (R²) of 0.84 and 0.74 during the training and testing phases, respectively, with normalized root mean square errors (NRMSE) of 0.35 and 0.40. Flood frequency analysis indicated that the impacts of climate change become more pronounced with increasing return periods. During the 2076–2100 period, the 50- and 100-year flood discharges are projected to increase by approximately 50% and 68%, respectively, relative to the baseline period (1985–2014). The highest frequency of flood events was observed in March. The findings emphasize the necessity of revising hydraulic structure design criteria and flood risk management strategies under future climate conditions.
Keywords
Subjects

Introduction

Climate change is one of the most important environmental challenges of the 21st century, significantly affecting hydrological processes, water resources, and extreme events such as floods and droughts. Increasing greenhouse gas emissions have altered precipitation patterns and intensified hydrological extremes worldwide. Floods are among the most destructive natural hazards, causing major economic, social, and environmental damages. CMIP6 climate models under SSP scenarios provide valuable future climate projections, but their outputs often contain biases that require correction for local-scale applications. Recent advances in machine learning have improved bias correction and reduced uncertainties in climate data. Therefore, this study investigates the impact of climate change on flood frequency in the Poldokhtar Basin using CMIP6 projections, machine learning-based bias correction, and hydrological modeling.

Method

The study was conducted in the Poldokhtar Basin, a major sub-basin of the Karkheh River in western Iran. Daily precipitation data from 23 CMIP6 GCMs were obtained from the NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 dataset for both historical and future periods under SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, and SSP585 scenarios. Observed precipitation data from three meteorological stations were used to evaluate and bias-correct the climate model outputs using the XGBoost algorithm. Model performance was assessed using MAE, RMSE, Pearson correlation coefficient, NSE, and KGE. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) based on XGBoost was then applied to reduce uncertainty and improve precipitation estimates. Daily streamflow was simulated using the hybrid ANFIS-PSO model with precipitation and lagged precipitation as inputs. Flood frequency analysis was conducted using annual maximum discharge series, and flood magnitudes for 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 year return periods were estimated using EasyFit under both baseline and future climate conditions.

Results

The results showed that XGBoost significantly improved CMIP6 precipitation simulations by reducing systematic errors. MAE decreased from about 2.1–2.4 mm to 1.1–1.5 mm, and RMSE dropped from 6.2–7 mm to 4–4.8 mm. Correlation coefficients increased to 0.5–0.65, while NSE and KGE also showed notable improvements. The MME-XGBoost model further enhanced performance, with correlation coefficients reaching 0.78–0.84 and NSE values of 0.58–0.70. The ANFIS-PSO model effectively simulated daily streamflow, explaining about 84% of discharge variability during training with an NRMSE of 0.35. Flood frequency analysis indicated stronger climate change impacts at higher return periods. Under SSP370 and SSP585, extreme flood magnitudes increased significantly, with 50-year and 100-year floods rising by about 50% and 68% by 2076–2100 compared to the baseline. Floods also remained concentrated in late winter and early spring, with March showing the highest frequency.

Conclusions

This study shows that integrating machine learning with climate projections improves the assessment of future hydrological extremes. The XGBoost model effectively reduced biases in CMIP6 precipitation data, while the MME-XGBoost approach decreased uncertainties across climate models. The ANFIS-PSO model also provided reliable streamflow simulations under future scenarios. Results indicate a significant increase in extreme flood magnitudes under future climate conditions, especially in high-emission scenarios. Although seasonal flood patterns remain relatively stable, the intensity of extreme floods is expected to rise notably. These findings emphasize the need to update hydraulic design standards, flood management strategies, and climate adaptation policies in the Poldokhtar Basin and similar regions.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authorship contribution

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

There is no use of any type of artificial intelligence-based technology in this paper.

Data availability statement

Data available on request from the authors.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Ethical considerations

The authors have refrained from data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and any other form of research misconduct. Ethical principles were fully observed throughout the conduct and publication of this scientific research, and all authors confirm their compliance with these principles.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Alfieri, L., Bisselink, B., Dottori, F., Naumann, G., de Roo, A., Salamon, P., ... & Feyen, L. (2017). Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth's Future, 5(2), 171-182.
Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Feyen, L., & Forzieri, G. (2015). Global warming increases the frequency of river floods in Europe. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(5), 2247–2260
Alipour, H., Salajegheh, A., Moghaddamnia, A., Khalighi, S., & Nassaji, M. (2022). Analyzing the Floods' Frequency and Severity under Climate Change Scenarios: A Case Study of Emameh Watershed. Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 11(34), 127-141. (In Persian)
Almazroui M, Saeed F, Saeed S, Islam MN, Ismail M, Klutse NAB, Siddiqui MH (2020) Projected change in temperature and precipitation over Africa from CMIP6. Earth Systems and Environment. 4(3):455–475
Aryal A, Shrestha S, Babel MS (2019) Quantifying the sources of uncertainty in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 135(1/2):193–209
Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Viglione, A., Perdigão, R. A., Parajka, J., Merz, B., ... & Živković, N. (2019). Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature, 573(7772), 108-111.
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018). A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 9(1), 1-99.‏ https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2
Chen, T. Guestrin, C. (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In KDD ’16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, pp. 785–794.
Dankers, R., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., Falloon, P. D., Fekete, B. M., Gosling, S. N., ... & Wisser, D. (2014). First look at changes in flood hazard in the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project ensemble. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 111(9), 3257–3261.
Dey, S., Zahid, S. T., Dey, S., Rahaman, K. M. A., & Islam, A. S. (2025). Regional flood frequency analysis in Northeastern Bangladesh using L-moments for peak discharge estimation at various return periods in ungauged catchments. Water, 17(12), 1771.
Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In MHS'95. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science (pp. 39-43).
Fallah Kalaki, M., Azizian, A., & Ramezani Etedali, H. (2026). Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Approaches in Bias Correction of CMIP6 Precipitation Data. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 56(11), 3087-3106.‏ (In Persian)
Fang, G., Yang, J., Chen, Y. N., & Zammit, C. 2015. Comparing bias correction methods in downscaling meteorological variables for a hydrologic impact study in an arid area in China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(6), 2547-2559.
Heshmati, S., Nazari, B., & Nikoo, M. R. (2025). Enhancing accuracy in streamflow prediction under climate change scenarios based on an integrated machine learning–metaheuristic optimization approach. Journal of Water and Climate Change, jwc2025499.
Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., ... & Kanae, S. (2013). Global flood risk under climate change. Nature climate change, 3(9), 816-821.
Hirabayashi, Y., Tanoue, M., Sasaki, O., Zhou, X., & Yamazaki, D. (2021). Global exposure to flooding from the new CMIP6 climate model projections. Scientific reports, 11(1), 3740.‌
Hosseini, S. M. (2022). Frequency Analysis and Investigation of the Factors Affecting 100-yr Peak-Flood in Iran’s Watersheds. Geography and Environmental Planning, 33(2), 19-38. (In Persian)
Jaiswal, R., Mall, R. K., Singh, N., Lakshmi Kumar, T. V., & Niyogi, D. (2022). Evaluation of bias correction methods for regional climate models: Downscaled rainfall analysis over diverse agroclimatic zones of India. Earth and Space Science, 9(2), e2021EA001981.
Jang J. S (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 23(3), 665-685.‏
Khan, M. I., Khan, F. A., Khan, A. U., Ullah, B., Ghanim, A. A., Al-Areeq, A. M., & Bakheit Taha, A. T. (2025). Future precipitation patterns: investigating the IDF curve shifts under CMIP6 pathways. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 27(3), 357-380. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2025.092
KHAZAEI, M. (2018). Assessment of climate change impacts on annual maximum daily runoff distribution via continuous stream-flow simulation. (In Persian)
Kim J H, Sung J H, Chung E S, Kim S U, Son M, Shiru M S (2021) Comparison of projection in meteorological and hydrological droughts in the Cheongmicheon Watershed for RCP4. 5 and SSP2-4.5. Sustainability 13(4):2066‌
Kimura, Y., Yamazaki, D., & Hirabayashi, Y. (2023). Reduction of the uncertainty of flood hazard analyses under a future climate by integrating multiple SSP-RCP scenarios. Authorea Preprints.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N., Peduzzi, P., ... & Sherstyukov, B. (2014). Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(1), 1-28.
Li, H., Zhang, Y., Lei, H., & Hao, X. (2023). Machine learning-based bias correction of precipitation measurements at high altitude. Remote Sensing, 15(8), 2180.‌
Mani, A., & Tsai, F. T. C. (2017). Ensemble averaging methods for quantifying uncertainty sources in modeling climate change impact on runoff projection. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 22(4), 04016067.‏ https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001487
Mazandarani Zadeh, H., Fallah Kalaki, M., & Azizian, A. (2023). Simulation of the effects of climate change on runoff using artificial neural network models and adaptive fuzzy neural inference system (Case study: tashk-Bakhtegan basin). Iran-Water Resources Research, 18(4), 1-18. (In Persian)
Mehri Y, Mehri M, Soltani J (2020) Evaluation of combined Models with Optimization Approach of PSO and GA in ANFIS for Predicting of Dispersion Coefficient in Rivers. Water and Irrigation Management, 10(1), 45-59. (In Persian)
Meresa, H., Tischbein, B., & Mekonnen, T. (2022). Climate change impact on extreme precipitation and peak flood magnitude and frequency: observations from CMIP6 and hydrological models. Natural Hazards, 111(3), 2649-2679.
Moghaddamnia A, Gousheh M. G, Piri J, Amin S, Han D (2009) Evaporation estimation using artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system techniques. Advances in Water Resources, 32(1), 88-97.‏
Nekooamal Kermani, M., Massah Bavani, A., Roozbahani, A., & Mohammadpur, M. R. (2022). Comparing the Performance of the Dynamic-Statistical Hybrid Method with the Dynamic Method for Downscaling of CMIP5 Precipitation Data. Iran-Water Resources Research, 17(4), 101-114. (In Persian)
O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C, van Vuuren DP, et al. (2016) the scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development 9:3461–82
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 12, 2825-2830.‌
Raju K S and Kumar D N 2020 Review of approaches for selection and ensembling of GCMs J. Water Clim. Change 11 577–99. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.128
Shetty, S., Umesh, P., & Shetty, A. (2023). The effectiveness of machine learning‐based multi‐model ensemble predictions of CMIP6 in Western Ghats of India. International Journal of Climatology, 43(11), 5029-5054.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8131
Tanimu, B., Bello, A. A. D., Abdullahi, S. A., Ajibike, M. A., Yaseen, Z. M., Kamruzzaman, M., ... & Shahid, S. (2024). Comparison of conventional and machine learning methods for bias correcting CMIP6 rainfall and temperature in Nigeria: B. Tanimu et al. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 155(6), 4423-4452.
Trenberth, K. E. (2011). Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate research, 47(1/2), 123-138.
Wang J, Hu L, Li D, Ren M (2020) Potential impacts of projected climate change under CMIP5 RCP scenarios on streamflow in the Wabash River Basin. Advances in Meteorology 2020:9698423
Yahyazadeh Shourabi, K., Niksokhan, M. H., & Nikoo, M. R. (2025). Enhancing flood frequency predictions under climate change and uncertainty using machine learning model fusion and wavelet transform. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-23.