Profitability Analysis of Grain Maize Cultivation under Saline Water and Deficit Irrigation in a Tape Drip Irrigation System in Fars Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Water Engineering Department, , Faculty of Agriculture, .Shiraz University. Shiraz. Iran

Abstract

In order to evaluate the economic feasibility of growing grain maize under deficit irrigation and irrigation water salinity, an experiment was conducted at the research farm of the Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture in the 2019. Therefore, a factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Four levels of irrigation water salinity were applied, including control (0.6), 2, 3.5, and 5 dS.m-1. Irrigation water treatment was applied at three water levels: FI, 0.75FI, and 0.5FI, equivalent to full irrigation, 75% full irrigation, and 50% full irrigation. The results showed that the maximum leaf area index (5.82) and seed yield (9.53 Mg.ha-1) were obtained in the full irrigation treatment with irrigation water salinity of 0.6 dS.m-1. Based on the results of economic analysis, the highest benefit-cost ratio of maize was 2.64 in full irrigation and irrigation water salinity of 0.6 dS.m-1. Based on the results of economic analysis, in the full irrigation treatment and 75% full irrigation at irrigation water salinity levels of 0.6 and 2 dS.m-1, the benefit-cost ratio was greater than one and the economic water productivity was also a positive number. Thus, the economic efficiency of water in full irrigation at irrigation water salinity levels of 0.6 and 2 dS.m-1 was 0.064 and 0.012 USD.m-3, respectively, and in 75% full irrigation it was 0.044 and 0.012 USD.m-3, respectively. Therefore, these treatments are economically justified. While in the 50% full irrigation treatment, at all levels of irrigation water salinity, the benefit-cost ratio was less than one and the economic water productivity was a negative number. Therefore, increasing the salinity of irrigation water to 2 dS.m-1 in full irrigation and 75% full irrigation in grain maize cultivation in the study area is economically justified.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

The economies of many developing countries rely heavily on agriculture, which plays a crucial role in contributing to gross domestic product and ensuring food security. However, drought and salinity are among the most significant abiotic stresses affecting plant growth, crop productivity, and water-use efficiency. Providing sufficient food for a growing global population remains a major challenge, particularly in developing countries where population growth continues to increase pressure on agricultural systems. Consequently, the demand for food is rising, leading to the excessive exploitation of water and land resources.To mitigate the adverse effects of drought and salinity on plant growth and crop production, it is essential to adopt multiple management strategies. One such approach is the use of unconventional water resources for irrigation. Given the high-water consumption in the agricultural sector, improving water productivity has become increasingly important. Tape-drip irrigation is a suitable method in this regard due to its high application efficiency and minimal water losses. Furthermore, deficit irrigation is an effective management strategy for enhancing water productivity under conditions of limited water availability. In drip irrigation systems, water is applied precisely and uniformly to the root zone, minimizing fluctuations in soil matric potential. This helps compensate for the reduction in osmotic potential caused by saline irrigation water and maintains a more favorable water balance for plant growth. Therefore, modern irrigation systems such as drip irrigation are considered suitable for the use of saline water because of their frequent irrigation intervals and ability to maintain higher soil moisture levels in the root zone. Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important cereal crops worldwide. It ranks third in cultivated area after wheat and rice and second in total production after sugarcane. Similar to wheat, barley, and rice, maize is a strategically important irrigated crop that plays a significant role in meeting the nutritional needs of both humans and livestock .Considering the economic importance of maize grain production and its extensive use in edible oil production, livestock and poultry feed, and various industrial applications, as well as the increasing challenges associated with water scarcity in the country and the region, this study aimed to evaluate the economic profitability of maize cultivation under deficit irrigation and different irrigation water salinity levels using tape-drip irrigation in the Bajgah region of Fars Province.

Materials and Methods

In order to investigate the economic profitability of grain maize cultivation at different levels of irrigation water salinity and deficit irrigation, an experiment was conducted at the research farm of the Water Engineering Department , Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University in 2019. The Faculty of Agriculture is located 16 kilometers north of Shiraz, at a longitude of 32°52′ and a latitude of 32°29′, at an altitude of 1810 meters above sea level. To conduct the research, a factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Four levels of irrigation water salinity were applied, including control (0.6), 2, 3.5, and 5 dS.m-1, equivalent to EC1, EC2, EC3, and EC4. Irrigation water treatment was applied at three water levels: FI, 0.75FI, and 0.5FI, equivalent to full irrigation, 75% full irrigation, and 50% full irrigation. The field was irrigated using tape-drip irrigation with outlet spacing of 20 cm and a flow rate of 3 liters per hour per meter of tape length. In order to investigate the effect of different levels of irrigation water salinity and deficit irrigation in tape drip irrigation on leaf area index, plant height, and seed yield in maize, analysis of variance and Duncan's range comparison test were used in SAS software version 9.4. In this study, with the aim of evaluating the economic feasibility of planting grain maize, engineering economics methods, namely net present value (NPV) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR), were used.

Results and Discussion

The results showed that applying irrigation water salinity and deficit irrigation reduced the leaf area index, plant height, and seed yield in maize. The main effect of irrigation water salinity showed that increasing irrigation water salinity from 0.6 to 2, 3.5, and 5 dS.m-1 caused a 1.4, 2.5, and 3.6 % reduction in plant height, respectively. The results showed that the highest economic water productivity of 0.064 USD.m-3, present value of $1178.53, and benefit-cost ratio of 2.64 were achieved in full irrigation with irrigation water salinity of 0.6 dS.m-1. In the full irrigation and 75% full irrigation treatments, the benefit-cost ratio was 2.64 and 1.85, respectively, at irrigation water salinity of 0.6 dS.m-1, and 1.32 and 1.27, respectively, at irrigation water salinity of 2 dS.m-1. The economic water productivity values for full irrigation and 75% full irrigation at irrigation water salinity of 0.6 dS/m were 0.064 and 0.044 USD.m-3, respectively, and for irrigation water salinity of 2 dS.m-1, they were 0.012 and 0.014 USD.m-3, respectively. Given that these values were positive, these treatments are economically justified in terms of economic water productivity. Therefore, in terms of   benefit -cost ratio and economic efficiency of water, irrigation water salinity treatment of 3.5 and 5 dS.m-1 in full irrigation, 75% full irrigation, and 50% deficit irrigation treatment are not economically justified at different levels of irrigation water salinity. According to the results of this study, under conditions of 50% full irrigation, the benefit-cost ratio is less than one at all levels of irrigation water salinity and the economic productivity of water is a negative number. Therefore, maize cultivation is not economically justified under 50% full irrigation in the region. These findings indicate the relative sensitivity of maize to water salinity and its high-water requirement. Therefore, in conditions of shortage of available freshwater and water shortage from the perspective of water resources management, 75% full irrigation treatment with a salinity of 2 dS.m-1 is economically recommended for grain maize cultivation in the study area.

Funding

The study was funded by Shiraz University, Iran national Science foundation (INSF), and Grant No. 2GCU1M222614.

Authorship contribution

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work no AI-assisted technology was used.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Shiraz University Research Council, the Drought Research Center, and the Iran National Science Foundation (NSF) for funding.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Asadi, H., & Qamarinejad, M. (2009, November). Irrigation water use efficiency and profitability in corn production in different exploitation groups: a case study in Sorkheh Plain. In National Conference on Water Crisis in Agriculture and Natural Resources (Vol. 5, p. 9). (In Persian)
Azizan, A. R. Sepaskhah. 2014. Maize response to different water, salinity and nitrogen levels: Agronomic behavior, International Journal of Plant Production, 8(1):107-130.
Anjum, S. A., Xie, X. Y., Wang, L. C., Saleem, M. F., Man, C., & Lei, W. (2011). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African journal of agricultural research6(9), 2026-2032.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). FAO Irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Rome: food and agriculture organization of the United Nations56(97), e156.
Alikhani-Mahvar, H., Babazadeh, H., Ghadami Firouzabadi, A., & Sarai Tabrizi, M. (2024). Evaluation of physical and economic water productivity under regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying of sunflower crop. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 18(4), 665-655. (In Persian)
Asadi, H., Mahmoodi, M., & Zare, S. (2022). Determining profitability and the economic productivity of agricultural water in crop production. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 15(6), 1404-1411. (In Persian)
Bazrafshan, J., Khalili, A., Zad-Parsa, S., Sepaskhah, A. R., Alizadeh, A., & Farhoodi, J. (2021). Documentary study of the situation of agricultural water resources and uses in Iran: Analysis of the current situation, pathology and solutions to the challenges. Strategic Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 6(1), 35-50. (In Persian)
Bassey, M. S., Abubakar, H. N., & Atteh, A. P. (2025). Benefit-cost analysis of maize production in smallholder farming communities across climate-Smart agriculture technology bundles in Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria.
Biswas, R., Molla, M. M. U., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Zonayet, M., & Castanho, R. A. (2022). Profitability analysis and input use efficiency of maize cultivation in selected areas of Bangladesh. Land, 12(1), 23.
Bahrami, M., Asaadi, M. A., & Khalilian, S. (2020). Evaluation of water productivity indices with emphasis on modern and traditional irrigation in crops of Shahriar County. Environment and Water Engineering, 6(3), 285-293. (In Persian)
Bhavsar, D., Limbasia, B., Mori, Y., Aglodiya, M. I., & Shah, M. (2023). A comprehensive and systematic study in smart drip and sprinkler irrigation systems. Smart Agricultural Technology5, 100303.
Blanco, F. F., Folegatti, M. V., Gheyi, H. R., & Fernandes, P. D. (2008). Growth and yield of corn irrigated with saline water. Scientia Agrícola65, 574-580.
Bybordi, A. (2010). Effects of salinity on yield and component characters in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Notulae Scientia Biologicae2(1), 81-83.
Bistgani, Z. E., Siadat, S. A., Bakhshandeh, A., Pirbalouti, A. G., Hashemi, M., Maggi, F., et al. (2018). Application of combined fertilizers improves biomass, essential oil yield, aroma profile, and antioxidant properties of Thymus daenensis Celak. Ind. Crop. Prod. 121, 434–440.
Dargahi, M. R., Jahan, M., Naseripour Yazdi, M. T., & Ghorbani, R. (2016). Evaluation of energy balance and economic analysis of rapeseed in Golestan province. Applied Agricultural Research, 29(3), 50-62. (In Persian)
Dawood, M. G. (2017). Improving drought tolerance of quinoa plant by foliar treatment of trehalose. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 245-254.
Fazeli, F., Akbari, G. A., Akbari, G. A., Naderi Arefi, A., & Benakashani, F. (2022). Investigation of the effect of irrigation management on morphological traits, yield and yield components of different genotypes of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences15(2), 327-334.
Fghire, R., Anaya, F., Issa Ali, O., Lamnai, K., Foughali, B., Faghire, M., ... & Wahbi, S. (2022). Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Fertilization on Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Water Status and Yield Productions. Gesunde Pflanzen74(1).
Fernández, J. E., Alcon, F., Diaz-Espejo, A., Hernandez-Santana, V., & Cuevas, M. V. (2020). Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high-density olive tree orchard. Agricultural water management237, 106074.
González, J. A., Eisa, S. S., Hussin, S. A. E. S., & Prado, F. E. (2015). Quinoa: an Incan crop to face global changes in agriculture. Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production, 1-18.
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., ... & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science327(5967), 812-818.
Gámez, A. L., Soba, D., Zamarreño, Á. M., García-Mina, J. M., Aranjuelo, I., & Morales, F. (2019). Effect of water stress during grain filling on yield, quality and physiological traits of Illpa and Rainbow quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Plants8(6), 173.
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Condori, O., Mamani, J., Miranda, R., ... & Vacher, J. (2008). Could deficit irrigation be a sustainable practice for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Southern Bolivian Altiplano?. Agricultural Water Management95(8), 909-917.
Huang, M., Zhang, Z., Zhu, C., Zhai, Y., & Lu, P. (2019). Effect of biochar on sweet corn and soil salinity under conjunctive irrigation with brackish water in coastal saline soil. Scientia Horticulturae250, 405-413.
Hanson, B., Hopmans, J. W., & Šimůnek, J. (2008). Leaching with subsurface drip irrigation under saline, shallow groundwater conditions. Vadose Zone Journal7(2), 810-818.
Huang, M., Zhang, Z., Zhu, C., Zhai, Y., & Lu, P. (2019). Effect of biochar on sweet corn and soil salinity under conjunctive irrigation with brackish water in coastal saline soil. Scientia Horticulturae250, 405-413.
Jayme-Oliveira, A., Ribeiro, W. Q., Ramos, M. L. G., Ziviani, A. C., & Jakelaitis, A. (2017). Amaranth, quinoa, and millet growth and development under different water regimes in the Brazilian Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira52, 561-571.
Jbawi, E. A., Danoura, R., & Yaacoub, A. (2018). Effect of deficit irrigation and manure fertilizer on improving growth and yield of quinoa in Syria. Open Acc J Agri Res: OAJAR-100007, 2018(01).
Jafari, M. S., Noory, H., Ebrahimian, H., Liaghat, A., & Sohani, Y. (2022). Investigating the combined effect of different amounts of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer on maize yield and productivity in drip irrigation. Water and Irrigation Management, 11(4), 669-682. (In Persian)
Kaman, H., Kirda, C., & Sesveren, S. (2011). Genotypic differences of maize in grain yield response to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management98(5), 801-807.
Kledzik, R., Kropkowski, M., Dudek, S., Kuśmierek-Tomaszewska, R., & Żarski, J. (2017). Evaluation of economic efficiency of irrigation in corn for grain production in 2005-2016. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich.
Lor Mohammad Hasani, M., Talebnejad, R., & Noshadi, M. (2022). Interaction Effects of Water Salinity and Deficit Irrigation on Growth of Grain Maize under Single row of Tape Irrigation. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 53(9), 1997-2008. (In Persian)
Li, X., Kang, Y., Wan, S., Chen, X., & Chu, L. (2015). Reclamation of very heavy coastal saline soil using drip-irrigation with saline water on salt-sensitive plants. Soil and Tillage Research146, 159-173.
Liu, Z., Li, P., Hu, Y., & Wang, J. (2015). Wetting patterns and water distributions in cultivation media under drip irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture112, 200-208.
Mehri, A., Soltani Mohammadi, A., Ebrahimian, H., & Boromandnasab, S. (2023). Economic evaluation of grain maize yield in surge and alternate deficit irrigation conditions. Water Management in Agriculture, 9(2), 73-90. (In Persian)
Mahrokh, A., Asadi, H., Afarinesh, A., Rezabeigi, M., Maknali, A., Karimi, K., ... & Bahmankar, M. (2025). The effect of crop management on the yield and quality of grain and productivity of corn productivity under conditions of farmer under north of Khuzestan province. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops, 13(2), 191-207. (In Persian)
Mearaji, H. S., Tavakoli, A., & Sepahvand, N. A. (2021). Evaluating the effect of cytokinin foliar application on morphological traits and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under optimal irrigation and drought stress conditions.
Muyu, N. N., TAMBI, M. D., & BIME, W. M. J. (2025). Analysis of Profitability Across Diverse Maize Value-Added Products in Mezam Division, Cameroon. Journal of Quantitative Finance and Economics, 7(1), 123-143.
Moghimi, M. M., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2015). Consideration of water productivity for farm water management in different conditions of water availability for dominant summer crops. Iran Agricultural Research33(2), 47-62.
Nazemi, A., Parandin, M., Sadraddini, A., & Ghamarnia, H. (2020). Economic evaluation of Zea Maize yield in Deficit irrigation and Surge irrigation strategy Case study: Islamabad-Gharb Area. Water and Irrigation Management, 9(2), 185-198. (In Persian)
Nyawade, S. O., Gitari, H. I., Karanja, N. N., Gachene, C. K., Schulte-Geldermann, E., & Parker, M. L. (2021). Yield and evapotranspiration characteristics of potato-legume intercropping simulated using a dual coefficient approach in a tropical highland. Field Crops Research, 274, 108327.
Okwany, R. O., Peters, R. T., Ringer, K. L., & Walsh, D. B. (2012). Sustained deficit irrigation effects on peppermint yield and oil quality in the semi-arid pacific northwest, USA. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(4), 551-558.
Parsa, S., Khazaeitabar, H., Shahidi, A., & Mahmoodi, S. (2021). Effect of deficit irrigation methods on physiological characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.). Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 14(2), 321-330. (In Persian)
Razzaghi, F., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2012). Calibration and validation of four common ET0 estimation equations by lysimeter data in a semi-arid environment. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science58(3), 303-319.
Roy, S. J., Tucker, E. J., & Tester, M. (2011). Genetic analysis of abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(3), 232-239.
Rachid, F., Fatima, A., Oudou, I. A., Kamal, L., Boubaker, F., Mustapha, F., ... & Said, W. (2022). Effects of deficit irrigation and fertilization on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) water status and yield productions. Gesunde Pflanzen, 74(1), 97-110.
Shelake, R. M., Kadam, U. S., Kumar, R., Pramanik, D., Singh, A. K., & Kim, J. Y. (2022). Engineering drought and salinity tolerance traits in crops through CRISPR-mediated genome editing: Targets, tools, challenges, and perspectives. Plant Communications.
Seyedan, S. M., & Mottaghi, M. (2019). Determination of the physical and economic water productivity for grain and forage corn under modern and traditional irrigation systems in Hamadan Province. (In Persian)
Sheikhzeinoddin, A., & Fathi, F. (2021). Management of maize sustainable production in Iran: A social benefits approach. Agricultural Economics Research13(1), 63-87. (In Persian)
Stephen, R. G. (2002). Irrigation water salinity and crop production. Agricultural and Natural Resources Department, University of California, Davis.
Sairam, R. K., & Tyagi, A. (2004). Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current science, 407-421.
Shrivastava, P., & Kumar, R. (2015). Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi journal of biological sciences, 22(2), 123-131.
Sairam, R. K., & Tyagi, A. (2004). Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current science, 407-421.
Sullivan, W. G., Wicks, E. M., & Koelling, C. P. (2014). Decision Making Considering Multiattributes. Engineering Economy (16th ed., p. 580). Harlow, England: Pearson.
Sun, J., Kang, Y., & Wan, S. (2013). Effects of an imbedded gravel–sand layer on reclamation of coastal saline soils under drip irrigation and on plant growth. Agricultural Water Management123, 12-19.
Shao, H. B., Chu, L. Y., Jaleel, C. A., & Zhao, C. X. (2008). Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes rendus biologies331(3), 215-225.
Sun, Y., Liu, F., Bendevis, M., Shabala, S., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2014). Sensitivity of two quinoa (ChenopodiumquinoaWilld.) varieties to progressive drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science200(1), 12-23.
Saeidi, R., Ramezani Etedali, H., Sotoodehnia, A., Kaviani, A., & Nazari, B. (2021). Salinity and fertility stresses modify K s and readily available water coefficients in maize (case study: Qazvin region). Irrigation Science, 39(3), 299-313.
Varjavand, P., Baghani, J., & Abbasi, F. (2021). Field evaluation of physical and economical water productivity of wheat (case study in Ahwaz and Dasht-e-Azadegan). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 15(3), 665-678. (In Persian)
Wan, S., Jiao, Y., Kang, Y., Hu, W., Jiang, S., Tan, J., & Liu, W. (2012). Drip irrigation of waxy corn (Zea mays L. var. ceratina Kulesh) for production in highly saline conditions. Agricultural water management104, 210-220.
Yuan, C., Feng, S., Huo, Z., & Ji, Q. (2019). Effects of deficit irrigation with saline water on soil water-salt distribution and water use efficiency of maize for seed production in arid Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 212, 424-432.
Zhang, Y., Hou, K., Qian, H., Gao, Y., Fang, Y., Xiao, S., & Ren, W. (2022). Characterization of soil salinization and its driving factors in a typical irrigation area of Northwest China. Science of the Total Environment, 837, 155808.
Zand-Parsa, S., Sepaskhah, A. R., & Ronaghi, A. (2006). Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize. Agricultural Water Management81(3), 227-256.