The Effect of Physical Crust Development and Disturbance on Erodibility and Dust Emission in Laboratory Conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Soil Sciences Dept- Faculty of Agriculture - Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz -Ahvaz -Iran

Abstract

Soil surface crusting, especially the physical type, is an important feature of dust source areas in Khuzestan province, which can have a significant impact on soil protection against wind erosion. But in most wind erosion studies, it has not been considered. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of physical crust disturbance caused by livestock traffic on soil crusted erodibility and dust emission. For this purpose, three dominant soils with the characteristic of surface crust formation were selected from the areas and transferred to the laboratory. The soils were placed into wind tunnel trays and subjected to a simulated rainfall to form a physical crust on their surfaces. After the soils dried and the physical crust formed, the trays were exposed to different trampling by livestock's hoof including 1, 2 and 5 crossings. The trays were then transferred to a wind tunnel laboratory and threshold friction velocity (TFV), erosion rate and PM10 emission flux were measured. The results showed that erosion and dust diffusion in the control treatment (without livestock traffic) was zero in all three soil types and with increasing the number of livestock traffic from one to five times TFV decreased by 25 to 49%, and the amount soil erosion and dust emission increased between 54-317% and 80-545%, respectively. The physical crust of sandy soil was more sensitive to livestock traffic than clay loam and silt loam. The findings of this study show that the formation of physical crust in this area is a desirable and valuable feature for inhibiting erosion and dust, which acts as a natural stabilizer and protecting them can have a huge impact on dust control.

Keywords

References

Adib, A. and Gafari Rad, S. (2019). Development of a new integrated method for generation IDF curves based on three climatic changes scenarios. International Journal of Science and Technology. 26 (2), pp. 742-751.
Ali Ehyaei, M. and Behbehani Zade, AA. (1993). Methods of Soil Chemical Analysis. Soil and Water Research Institute of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran, Iran.
Baddock M. C., Zobeck T. M., Van Pelt R. S. and Fredrickson E. L. (2011). Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed, crusted playa surfaces: Cattle trampling effects. Aeolian Research 3, 31–41
Belnap J, Büdel B. and Lange O.L. (2003). Biological soil crusts: characteristics and distribution. In Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management, Belnap J, Lange OL (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 3–30.
Belnap, J. and Eldridge D. (2003). Disturbance and recovery of biological soil crusts. In Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management, Belnap J, Lange OL (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 363–383.
Belnap, J. and Gillette, D.A.I. (1997). Disturbance of biological soil crusts: impacts on potential wind erodibility of sandy desert soils in southeastern Utah. Land Degrad. Dev. 8, 355–362
Belnap, J., Phillips, S. L., Herrick, J. E. and. Johansen, J. R. (2007). Wind erodibility of soils at Fort Irwin, California (Mojave Desert), USA, before and after trampling disturbance: implications for land man- agement. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32:75–84.
Belnap, J., Walker, B.J., Munson, S.M. and Gill, R.A. (2014). Controls on sediment production in two U.S. deserts. Aeolian Res. 14:15–24. doi:10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.03.007
Brungard, C.W., Boettinger, J.L. and Hipps, L.E. (2015). Wind erosion potential of lacustrine and alluvial soils before and after disturbance in the eastern Great Basin, USA: Estimating threshold friction velocity using easier-to-measure soil properties. Aeolian Research, 18, 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.07.006
Bu, C.F., Gale, W.J., Cai, Q.G. and Wu, S.F. (2013). Process and Mechanism for the Development of Physical Crusts in Three Typical Chinese Soils. Pedosphere 23: 321–332.
Chen, W. (1991). Wind tunnel simulation on loessal soil erosion by wind (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Water and Soil Conservatia Sinica. 5: 105-108.
Chen, W. and Fryrear D.W. (1997). Influence of mechanical disturbance on erodibility of sandy loam soils by wind, paper presented International Symposium on Wind Erosion, U. S. Dep. of Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Wind Erosion Res. Unit, Kans. State Univ., Manhattan, Kans., 3–5 June.
Dargahian, F., Lotfinasab Asl S., Khosroshahi, M. and Gohardoust, A. (2017). Determining the share of internal and external resources of dust in Khuzestan province. Iran nature journal. 2 (5), 36-41 (in farsii)
Fan, Y., Lei, T., Shainberg, I. and Cai, Q. (2008). Wetting rate and rain depth effects on crust strength and micromorphology. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, pp. 1604-1610
Geological Survey and Mineral Explorations of Iran (GSI) (2016). Sedimentary geochemistry of dust sources in Khuzestan province. Report  (in farsi)
Gillette, D.A., Adams, J., Muhs, D. and Kihl, R. (1982). Threshold traction velocities and rupture moduli for crusted desert soils for the input of soil particles into the air. J. Geophysical Res. 87(C11): 9003-9015.
Katra I. (2020). Soil Erosion by Wind and Dust Emission in Semi-Arid Soils Due to Agricultural Activities. Agronomy, 10, 89; doi:10.3390/agronomy10010089
Lopez, M.V., de Dios Herrero, J.M., Hevia, G.G., Gracia, R. and Buschiazzo, D.E. (2007). Determi- nation of thewind-erodible fraction ofsoils using different methodologies. Geoderma 139, 407–411.
Macpherson, T., Nickling, W.G., Gillies, J.A. and Etyemezian, V. (2008). Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed supply-limited desert surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 113(F2): F02S04.
Marticorena, B., Bergametti, G., Gillette, D., Belnap, J. (1997). Factors controlling threshold friction velocity in semiarid and arid areas of the United States. J. Geophys. Res. 102 (D19), 23277–23287.
Munson, S.M., Belnap, J., Okin, G.S. (2011). Responses of wind erosion to climate- induced vegetation changes on the Colorado Plateau. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3854–3859.
Pi, H., Sharratt, B. (2019). Threshold friction velocity influenced by the crust cover of soils in the Columbia plateau. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 83 (1), 232–241. https: //doi.org/ 10. 2136/ sssaj2018.06.0230.
Ravi, S., Zobeck, T.M., Over, T.M., Okin, G.S. and D’Odorico, P. (2006). On the effect of moisture bonding forces in air-dry soils on threshold friction velocity of wind erosion. Sedimentology 53, 597–609.
Research Institute of Forest and Rangeland (RIFR) of Iran, (2018). Comprehensive studies of internal-origin dust control in Khuzestan province. Report (in Persian)
Shao, Y. (2000). Physics and Modeling of Wind Erosion. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.
Wu W., Yan P., Wang Y., Dong, M., Meng, X. and Xinran, J.I. (2018). Wind tunnel experiments on dust emissions from different landform types. Journal of Arid Land, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0100-4.
Yan, Y., Wu, L., Xin, X., Wang, X. and Yang, G. (2015). How rain-formed soil crust affects wind erosion in a semi-arid steppe northern China. Geoderma 249–250 (2015) 79–86
Zarasvandi, A., Carranza E.J.M., Moore, F. and Rastmanesh, F. (2011). Spatiotemporal occurrences and mineralogical–geochemical characteristics of airborne dusts in Khuzestan Province (southwestern Iran). J Geochem Explor 111:138–151.
Pagliai, M. and Stoops G. (2010). Physical and biological surface crusts and seals. In: Stoops G, Marcelino V, Mees F (eds) Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and Regoliths. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 419–440.
Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research
Volume 52, Issue 4
June 2021
Pages 1059-1069

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics