Variations of Runoff Generation during Rainfall Event when Different Levels of Polyacrylamide in Its Powder vs Liquid form Applied

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate students, of Watershed Management Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modarres University

2 Professor, Department of Watershed Management Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modarres University corresponding author

3 Accociate Professor, Department of Agriculture Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran

Abstract

A study of the temporal variations in runoff generation is one of the important in water and soil conservation when either under natural conditions or accompanied by application of soil amendments. However, runoff generation variations along with application different types of soil amendments has less been considered. Therefore, the current study was planned to investigate such states of runoff generations' temporal variations as observed on a clay-loamy soil. To follow the purpose, the effects of different levels of Polyacrylamide  (0.4, 2, and 6 g m-2) on runoff generation in the presence of flour vs liquid types were carried out on 0.25 m2-small plots and as well in lab conditions. Rainfall simulation was performed with two intensities of 50 and 80 mm h-1 for 17 and 8 minutes, respectively, compatible with the dominant conditions of the area, and after 48 hours past from  Polyacrylamide application. Results obtained from general linear model verified non-significant effect (P<0.2) of 0.4 g m-2 treatment (use of flour vs liquid form Polyacrylamide) and the significant effect (p=0.00) of rainfall intensity on runoff generation. In addition, significant effect of Polyacrylamide type at 2 and 6 g m-2 levels (P<0.04) and also rainfall intensity (p=0.00) on runoff generation was verified. Also, the cross effect of amendment type and rainfall intensity on runoff intensity in the case of 0.4 g m-2 treatment was evaluated as insignificant (p>0.2), whereas it was found significant for the  2 and 6 g m-2 treatments (p<0.04).

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aase, J. K., Bjorneberg, D. L., and Sojka, R. E. (1998) .Sprinkler Irrigation Runoff and Erosion Control with Polyacrylamide – Laboratory Tests. SoilScience Society of America Journal, 62, 1681- 1687.
Afrasiab, P. And Chari, M. (2013). Effect of polyacrylamide on runoff, soil erosion and water infiltration on slopes using rainfall simulator. Journal of Water Research in Agricultural, 27 (2), 261-290. (in Farsi)
Ai-Ping, W., Fa-Hu, L., and Sheng-Min, Y. (2011). Effect of Polyacrylamide Application on Runoff, Erosion, and Soil Nutrient Loss Under Simulated Rainfall. Pedosphere, 21(5), 628–638.
Ajwa, H. A. and Trout, T. J. (2006). Polyacrylamide and water quality effects on Infiltration in sandy loam soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 643-650.
Alizadeh, A. (2009) Soil Physics, Tehran University Press, first edition, 440 p. (in Farsi)
Awad, Y. M., Blagodatskaya, E., Ok, Y. S.. and Kuzeyakov, Y. (2012). Effects of polyacrylamide, Biopolymer, and Biochar on Decomposition of Soil Organic Matter and Plant Residues as Determined by 14C and Enzyme Activities. European Journal of Soil Biology, 48, 1-10.
Darboux, F., Davy, Ph., Gascuel-Odoux, C., and Huang, C. (2001). Evolution of Soil Surface Roughness and Flowpath Connectivity in Overland Flow Experiments. Catena, 46(2-3), 125-139.
Defersha, M. B., Quraishi, S., and Mellese, A. M. (2011). The Effect of Slope Steepness and Antecedent Moisture Content on Interrill Erosion, Runoff and Sediment Size Distribution in The Highlands of Ethiopia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(1), 2367–2375.
Flanagan, D. C., Chaudhari, K. L., and Norton, D. (2002). Polyacrylamide Soil Amendment Effects on Runoff and Sediment Yield on Steep Slopes: Part II. Natural Rainfall Conditions. Transactions of the American Society of AgriculturalEngineers, 45 (5), 1-13.
Green, V. S. and Stott, D. E. (2001). Polyacrylamide: A Review of the Use, Effectiveness, and Cost of a Soil Erosion Control Amendment. 10th International Soil Conservation Meeting, May 24-29, 1999, Purdue University and the USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, 384-389.
Ghorbanie, vaghei H. and Bahrami, H. A., Ghafarian mogharab, M. H., Shahab, H., and Taliee Tabari, P. (2008). Efficiency of anionic polyacrylamide in water infiltration rate of the soil, Journal of Soil and Water Research, 39 (1), 77-84. (in Farsi)
Hazbavi, Z., Sadeghi, S. H. R., and Younesi, H. A. (2012). Analysis and Assessing Effectability of Runoff Components from Different Levels of Polyacrylamide. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2 (2), 1-12. (in Farsi)
Hawke, R. M., Price, A. G., and Bryan, R. B. (2006). The Effect of Initial Soil Water Content and Rainfall Intensity on Near-Surface Soil Hydrologic Conductivity: A Laboratory Investigation, Catena, 65(3), 237-246.
Inbar, A., Ben-Hur, M., Sternberg, M., and Lado, M. (2015). Using polyacrylamide to mitigate post-fire soil erosion. Geoderma, 239, 107-114.
Javadi, M.. Zahtabyan, Gh., Ahmadi, H., Aiobi, Sh., and Jafari, M. (2011). Comparison of estimated production potential of runoff and sediment in Vahdhaykary using Rainfall (Case Study: Watershed Nvmhrvd, Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Sciences, 6 (2), 3-14. (in Farsi)
Jiang, T., Teng, L., Wei, Sh., Deng, L., Luo, Z., and Chen, Y. (2010). Application of Polyacrylamide to Reduce Phosphorus Losses from a Chinese Purple Soil: A Laboratory and Field Investigation. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1437-1445.
McLaughlin, R., Amoozegar, A., Duckworth, O., and Heitman, J. (2014). Optimizing Soil-Polyacrylamide Interactions for Erosion Control at Construction Sites. Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina. Report No. 441. 47 pp.
Peterson, J. R., Flanagan, D. C., and Tishmack, J.K. (2002). PAM Application Method and Electrolyte Source Effects on Plot-Scale Runoff and Erosion. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 45(6), 1859-1867.
Prats, S. A., Martins, M. A. S., Cortizo, M. M., Ben-Hur, M., and Keizer, J. J. (2014). Polyacrylamide Application versus Forest Residue Mulching for Reducing Post-Fire Runoff and Soil Erosion. Science of the Total Environment, 468, 464-474.
Rabiee, A., Gilani, M., and Jamshidi, e. (2011). Acrylamide-based anionic polyacrylamide prepared as soil stabilizers. Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 4 (24), 291-300. (in Farsi)
Razali, N. M. and Wah Y. B., (2011) Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogrov-Smirnov, Lillifores and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of StatisticalModeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
Roa-Espinosa, A., Bubuenzer, G. D., and Miyashita, E. S. (1999). Sediment and Runoff Control on Construction Sites using Four Application Methods of Polyacrylamide Mix. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Annual Meeting Paper No. 99-2013. Available at (webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu.sci-hub.org)
Sadeghi, S. H. R., Abdollahi, Z., and Khaledi Darvishan, A. V. (2013). Experimental Comparison of Some Techniques for Estimating Natural Rain Drop Size Distribution in Caspian Sea Southern Coast, Iran, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(6), 1374-1382.
Sepaskhah, A. R. and Bazrafshan-Jahromi, A. R. (2006). Controlling Runoff and Erosion in Sloping Land with Polyacrylamide under a Rainfall Simulator. Biosystems Engineering, 93(4), 469-474.
Sirjacobs, D., Shainberg, I., Rapp, I., And Levy, G. J. (2000). Polyacrylamide, Sediments, and Interrupted Flow on Rill Erosion and Intake Rate. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 1487-1495.
Sojka, R. E., Lentz, R. D., Ross, C. W., Trout, T. J., Bjorneberg, D. L., and Aas, J. K. (1998). Polyacrylamide Effects on Infiltration in Irrigated Agriculture. Journalof Soil Water Conservation, 53, 325-331.
Shainberg, I. G. J., Levy, P., Rengasamy, H., and Frenkel, H. (1991). Aggregate stability and seal formation as affected by drops impact energy and soil amendments. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 154, 113-118.
Shahbazi, A. S., Sarmadian, F., Refahi, H., and Gorgi, M. (2005). Effect of polyacrylamide on soil erosion and runoff Shvr- sodium. Journal of Agricultural Science, 36 (5), 1103-1112. (in Farsi)
Shekofteh, H., Refahi, H., and Gorgi, M. (2005). Effect of chemical amide soil erosion and runoff. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 36 (1) 177-186. (in Farsi)
Shin, M. H., Won, C. H., Jang, J. R., Choi, Y. H., Shin, J. Y., Lim, K. J., and Choi, J. D. (2013). Effect of Surface Cover on the Reduction of Runoff and Agricultural NPS Pollution from Upland Fields. Paddy Water Environment, 11: 493-501.
Shoemaker, A. E. (2009). Evaluation of Anionic Polyacrylamide as an Erosion Control Measure Using Intermediate-Scale Experimental Procedures. Auburn University MSc. Thesis, USA, 220p.
Sirjacobs, D., Shainberg, I., Rapp, I., and Levy, G. J. (2000). Polyacrylamide, Sediments, and Interrupted Flow Effects on Rill Erosion and Intake Rate. SoilScience Society of America Journal, 64,1487–1495.
Smith, H. J. C., Levy, G. J., and Shainberg, I. (1990). Water-droplet energy and soil amendments: Effect on infiltration and erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 1084-1087.
Ventura, E., Nearing, M. A., Amore, E., and Norton, L. D. (2002). The Study of Detachment and Deposition on a Hillslope using a Magnetic Tracer, Catena, 48(3), 149-161.
Wang, P. K. and Pruppacher, H. R. (1977). Acceleration to Terminal Velocity of Cloud and Raindrops, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 16(3), 275-280.
Yu J., Lei T., Shainberg, I., Mamedov, A. I., and Levy, G. J. (2003). Infiltration and Erosion in Soils Treated with Dry PAM and Gypsum. Soil Science Society ofAmerica Journal, 67, 630–636.
Zarrinkafsh, M. (1993). Applied Soil Science, Tehran university Press, Tehran, 342p.