<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-479X</Issn>
				<Volume>44</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree Methods for Mapping Soil Units in Ardakan Region</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree Methods for Mapping Soil Units in Ardakan Region</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>173</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>182</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">50062</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/ijswr.2013.50062</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ROHOLLAH</FirstName>
					<LastName>TAGHIZADEH-MEHRJARDI</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Ardakan, Ardakan, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-4620-6624</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>FARVARDIN</FirstName>
					<LastName>SARMADIAN</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, University College of Agriculture &amp; Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-9894-2765</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>MAHMOUD</FirstName>
					<LastName>OMID</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, University College of Agriculture &amp; Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>GHOLAM REZA</FirstName>
					<LastName>SAVAGHEBI</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, University College of Agriculture &amp; Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>NORAYER</FirstName>
					<LastName>TOOMANIAN</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Isfahan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>MOHAMMAD JAVAD</FirstName>
					<LastName>ROUSTA</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, National Salinity Center</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>MOHAMMAD HASAN</FirstName>
					<LastName>RAHIMIAN</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor, National Salinity Center</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In response to the demand for soil spatial information, the acquisition of digital auxiliary data and their matching with field soil observations is on the increase. With the harmonization of these data sets, through computer based methods, the so-called Digital soil Maps are increasingly being found to be as reliable as the traditional soil mapping practices, and with no prohibitive costs. Therefore, in the present research, it has been attempted to Develop Decision Tree (DTA) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models for spatial prediction of soil taxonomic classes in an area covering about 720 km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; located in an arid region of central Iran where traditional soil survey methods are very difficult to undertake. Within this using the conditioned Latin hypercube sampling method, location of 187 soil profiles were spotted and then described, sampled, analyzed and allocated in taxonomic classes according to soil taxonomy of America. Auxiliary data used in this study to represent predictive soil forming factors were terrain attributes, Landsat 7 ETM&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; data and a geomorphologic surfaces map. Results revealed that DTA benefited from a the higher accuracy than ANN for about 7% as regarded the prediction of soil classes. A determination of coefficient (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;), overall accuracy and, Kappa coefficient calculated for the two models were recorded as 0.34, 0.46, 48%, 52%, and 0.13 vs. 0.25, respectively. The results revealed some auxiliary variables as having more influence on the predictive soil class model. Wetness index, geomorphology map and multi-resolution index of valley bottom flatness could be named as some of these variables. In general, results showed that decision tree models benefited from a higher accuracy than ANN ones, with results as more convenient for interpretation. Therefore, use of decision tree models for spatial prediction of soil properties (category and continuous soil data) is recommended in the future studies.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In response to the demand for soil spatial information, the acquisition of digital auxiliary data and their matching with field soil observations is on the increase. With the harmonization of these data sets, through computer based methods, the so-called Digital soil Maps are increasingly being found to be as reliable as the traditional soil mapping practices, and with no prohibitive costs. Therefore, in the present research, it has been attempted to Develop Decision Tree (DTA) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models for spatial prediction of soil taxonomic classes in an area covering about 720 km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; located in an arid region of central Iran where traditional soil survey methods are very difficult to undertake. Within this using the conditioned Latin hypercube sampling method, location of 187 soil profiles were spotted and then described, sampled, analyzed and allocated in taxonomic classes according to soil taxonomy of America. Auxiliary data used in this study to represent predictive soil forming factors were terrain attributes, Landsat 7 ETM&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; data and a geomorphologic surfaces map. Results revealed that DTA benefited from a the higher accuracy than ANN for about 7% as regarded the prediction of soil classes. A determination of coefficient (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;), overall accuracy and, Kappa coefficient calculated for the two models were recorded as 0.34, 0.46, 48%, 52%, and 0.13 vs. 0.25, respectively. The results revealed some auxiliary variables as having more influence on the predictive soil class model. Wetness index, geomorphology map and multi-resolution index of valley bottom flatness could be named as some of these variables. In general, results showed that decision tree models benefited from a higher accuracy than ANN ones, with results as more convenient for interpretation. Therefore, use of decision tree models for spatial prediction of soil properties (category and continuous soil data) is recommended in the future studies.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">digital soil mapping</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Latin hyper cube</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Soil great groups</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Spatial prediction</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ijswr.ut.ac.ir/article_50062_02dd0428a167bde5e5b544cc1aae3f74.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
