p. 233−242
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 243−259
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 261−268
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 269−279
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 281−292
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 293−302
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 303−315
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 317−327
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 329−340
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 341−351
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 353−364
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 365−375
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 377−383
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 385−395
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
NaCl>Na2SO4 which showed that the membrane is positively charged. The rejection rate of Na+ and Ca2++Mg2+ of agricultural drainage water in all dilution levels were between 39.76-50.71% and 19.34-40.95%, respectively. The rejection rate of EC and SAR were changed between 37.10-46.18% and 30.80-36.38 %, respectively. Finally, the efficiency of this laboratory-made Nano-polymeric membrane was compared with a commercial membrane (NF2, Spero). Results showed that despite of lower permeability of PE membrane, its EC rejection rate was higher than commercial membrane in all dilution levels.]]>
p. 397−411
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 413−423
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 425−437
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 439−451
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 453−465
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2
p. 467−481
2423-7833
Vol.49/No.2